Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

A T Nettles

Publications and source records attributed to A T Nettles.

6 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2022

The Effects of Co-cured Versus Precured Carbon/Epoxy Face Sheets on the Modulus and Compression After Impact Strength of Honeycomb Sandwich Structure

This study presents experimental results of compression after impact (CAI) and stiffness testing of aluminum honeycomb core sandwich structure with quasi-isotropic face sheets that have either been co-cured or precured (and then bonded to the core in a secondary operation). The co-cured face sheets contain some ply waviness whereas the precured face sheets did not. The effect of this waviness was ascertained for two important design parameters for the Space Launch System (SLS) Payload Adapter Fitting (PAF); compressive modulus and CAI strength. It was found that there was no effect on the modulus between co-cured and precured face sheets using the material and processes in this study. In addition, there was no difference in CAI strength behavior between the co-cured and precured face sheet.

sandwich structure↗
NASA NTRS2022

A Damage Resistance Comparison of Wet-Wound IM7 and T1100 Carbon Fiber/Epoxy Cylinders

This technical report presents the results of a damage tolerance comparison of two wet-wound cylinders; one made with IM7 carbon fiber and the other with T1100 carbon fiber. Damage was inflicted on the cylinders in the form of impact and the resulting damage was assessed mainly by cross-sectional examination of the damage zone after impact. Due to financial restraints, no residual strength testing was performed in this study. The amount of fiber breakage was the response variable of interest since fiber breakage, rather than delaminations or other matrix damage, governs the burst strength of rocket motor cases. The results showed that the T1100 fiber may be slightly more damage resistant than the IM7 fiber.

A T Nettles↗
NASA NTRS2022

A Quantitative Damage Tolerance Comparison of High Strength and High Modulus Carbon Fiber Sandwich Structure

This study presents experimental results of the compression after impact (CAI) testing of sandwich structure with face sheets made either with IM7/8552 high strength fiber or HM63/8552 high modulus fiber. While the HM63/8552 face sheet sandwich specimens would not be as damage tolerant as the IM7/8552 face sheet sandwich specimens, a quantitative measure of how much more damage tolerant the IM7/8552 face sheets were than the HM63/8552 face sheets was sought. Due to the IM7/8552 face sheets being 28% thicker than the HM63/8552 face sheets, the impact energies used needed to be adjusted for a fair comparison. The results show that the modulus is 35% lower for the IM7/8552 face sheet sandwich structure while the CAI strength

High modulus carbon fiber↗
NASA NTRS2021

Compression After Impact Strength Comparison of Rohacell Foam and Aluminum Honeycomb Core Sandwich Structure

This Technical Memorandum is a follow-on study to a previous one1 that examined the compression after impact (CAI) strength of carbon fiber sandwich structure with aluminum honeycomb core and Rohacell foam core with barely visible impact damage (BVID). In this current study a wider range of impact energies were utilized and the CAI strength assessed with these different damage severity levels. This was done to provide a more complete database for the two types of sandwich structure tested in these studies. In addition, the honeycomb sandwich specimens were tested with both the ‘L’ and ‘W’ directions aligned with the axis of compression loading. As in the study examining CAI strength with BVID1, the results were normalized by the mass of the sandwich structure. The results showed that the CAI strength did differ depending on the orientation of the core during testing and that when tested in the W-direction, the honeycomb core sandwich structure had about the same CAI strength as the foam core sandwich structure when normalized by the mass of the sandwich structures.

Sandwich Structure↗
NASA NTRS2021

Damage Tolerance of Candidate Sandwich Structure for the Space Launch System (SLS) Payload Adapter Fitting (PAF)

This Technical Memorandum presents results from a damage tolerance study undertaken in support of the payload adapter fitting (PAF) for the Space Launch System (SLS) program at NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC). The study consisted of determining the compression-after-impact (CAI) strength of candidate carbon/epoxy face sheet sandwich structure that has been identified for potential use to manufacture the PAF hardware. Two types of core material that have been considered for use on the PAF structure were used in this study. One was an aluminum honeycomb and the other was a Rohacell foam. Levels of barely visible impact damage (BVID) were determined for the types of sandwich structure tested in this study and this level of damage was used for CAI strength testing. It was found that the honeycomb core sandwich structure failed by face sheet failure and the foam core sandwich structure failed by core shear failure. CAI strength values were normalized by weight of the sandwich structure since lower mass is desirable for this structure.

sandwich structure↗