Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

A. Glocer

Publications and source records attributed to A. Glocer.

Energetic Proton Acceleration By EMIC Waves in Io’s Footprint Tail

In this study, we present a survey of energetic proton observations associated with Io’s footprint tail (FPT) and compare their signatures with in situ measurements of the plasma waves and lower-energy electron environments. We find further supporting evidence that proton acceleration in Io’s FPT is likely a consequence of wave–particle interactions via electromagnetic ion cyclotron waves that are generated by precipitating electrons into Jupiter’s ionosphere. This idea was originally proposed by Clark et al. (2020) and Sulaiman et al. (2020) based on NASA’s Juno mission likely transiting Io’s Main Alfvén Wing (MAW) during its twelfth orbit (i.e., PJ12). Additionally, the analysis of > 50 keV protons presented here highlights important observational details about the Io–Jupiter interaction as follows: 1) proton acceleration in Io’s FPT is a persistent feature and the energy flux carried by the protons is highest at smaller Io-Alfvén tail distances; 2) energetic protons exhibit positive correlations with both plasma waves and <100 keV/Q electrons; 3) during a small number of Io FPT crossings, the protons display finer spatial/temporal structure reminiscent of the electron observations reported by Szalay et al. (2018); and 4) the proton pitch angle distributions are characterized by two types: conic distributions in or near Io’s MAW and isotropic elsewhere.

space physics↗

Stormtime Ring Current Heating of the Ionosphere and Plasmasphere

The energy deposition from ring current ions into the high density “cold” plasma of the ionosphere and plasmasphere is analyzed, based on a Comprehensive Inner Magnetosphere-Ionosphere simulation of the 2015 October 7 storm. In addition, the Naval Research Laboratory Sami3 is Also a Model of the Ionosphere ionosphere/plasmasphere code is used to simulate the effect of Coulomb-collision heating of plasmasphere and ionosphere electrons by ring current ions. We find that, during stormtime peaks in the Dst index, energy is deposited at altitudes as low as 100 km. Heating along the entirety of any given field line, both in the ionosphere and plasmasphere, contributes to increased temperatures in the ionosphere F layer and inner magnetosphere and to subsequent cold O + outflows. However, relative to the heating of the plasmasphere, the direct heating of the ionosphere by ring current ions produces only small effects. Qualitative model-data agreement on the N + /O + density ratio is consistent with the hypothesis that these outflows are driven by thermal forcing.

J. Krall↗

Connecting Energy Input With Ionospheric Upflow and Outflow

The connection between energy inputs and the generation of ion upflows and outflows is a topic of keen scientific interest and the subject of a number of empirical studies. Despite this interest, it remains uncertain how different ion species respond to energy input, what defines the upper and lower bounds of the ion flux, and what role solar illumination plays in regulating the relationship between energy input and ion upflows/outflows. This work simulates how ion flux scales with low and high altitude energization, and to a combination of both. Furthermore, we examine the influence of solar illumination on these relationships by considering how the scaling of ion flux with energy input changes over the solar cycle, comparing solar minimum and maximum, as well as how they change from day to night conditions. We find O -+ flux tends to respond more strongly to energy inputs than H -+ flux, with the O -+ flux often exhibiting a lower activation energy and a greater dynamic range. The lower bound of the ion flux at 4,000 km is typically defined by the polar wind H -+ , although O -+ upflows can dominate at low altitudes in the presence of significant frictional heating of the ion gas or soft electron precipitation. However, when significant soft electron precipitation and wave-particle interactions are present simultaneously the lower bound of the ion flux at 4,000 km is defined by the O -+ . Finally, we find a difference between the steady state response of the outflow to energy input and the peak response.

A. Glocer↗