Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Abigail Ann Patricia Zinecker

Publications and source records attributed to Abigail Ann Patricia Zinecker.

5 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Pressurized Rover Lunar Surface Windows Thermal Trade Study

The pressurized rover (PR) is a habitable lunar vehicle that supports up to two crew members and EVAs. The PR is expected to operate with a crew at the lunar south pole for up to 30 consecutive days. Lunar surface missions represent a significant thermal challenge due in part to the extreme changes in temperature environment. Minimizing heat leaks is essential to be able to survive cold phases of lunar surface missions. Windows in particular can be a significant source of heat leak when designed without thermal performance in mind. In addition, correctly modeling windows, and transparent materials in general, represents a significant thermal challenge. It can also be challenging to obtain accurate radiative properties for modern window materials. This study focuses on the modeling approach, results, and possible window heat leak mitigation techniques for pressurized rover. Mitigation techniques explored in this study include low emissivity coatings and removable internal or external covers. Window layup, geometry, and size are also assessed in this study for their impact to heat leak.

Sydney June Taylor↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Using Thermal Desktop to Model Effects of Plume Heating on MLI

Gateway draws on experience from International Space Station (ISS) and geostationary satellites for many aspects of design, including Multilayer Insulation (MLI) material selection. MLI is used on external thermal surfaces and can be exposed to high plume heating on modular spacecraft with visiting vehicles such as Gateway. Due to Gateway’s smaller size and closer proximity of sensitive hardware to plumes from visiting vehicles, the expected and contingency plume heating loads are higher than those of ISS. Because of MLI’s low mass and thermal conductivity between layers, high plume heating loads can potentially heat MLI past its thermal limits. Usually when modeling MLI, it is a single node of insulation with a given effective emissivity. This method is not adequate for modeling with plume heating because you cannot accurately measure the MLI temperature, or the temperature of each individual layer. Modeling MLI is complicated because there are several layers and the conduction between each layer is undefined. It is further complicated by the variety of material options for MLI and their respective weights, optics, transmissivity, and temperature limits. This paper shows an attempt at modeling different MLI blankets exposed to solar and plume heating loads using Thermal Desktop. Several sensitivity studies were run including examining distance between layers, varying conductivity between layers, effects of different MLI materials, and plume heating loads and durations.

MLI↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Continuation of Solar Absorptivity Degradation of Spacecraft Materials Due to UV and Charged Particles in the Gateway Environment

Gateway is a lunar orbiting platform that will be assembled in space similar to the International Space Station. Modules will arrive following different transit orbits, some of which have an extended duration in the Van Allen Belts. This means the spacecraft is exposed to significant charged particle radiation, after which it must operate in cislunar space for 15 years. Charged particle and UV degradation of potential Gateway materials was identified as a knowledge gap by the Passive Thermal Control System (PTCS) Group as end-of-life solar absorptivity greatly impacts thermal performance. Multiple rounds of ground testing have been completed at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center in which potential Gateway materials were subjected to expected worst-case transit charged particle fluence (9.86x1015 protons/cm2 at 2.5 keV and 3.1x1016 electrons/cm2 at 10 keV) and up to 5093 Equivalent Solar Hours (ESH) of UV exposure. This report builds on previous data from Zinecker et al. 2022 which presented the first round of ground testing. Additional materials have been tested and solar absorptivity degradation along with lessons learned are shared. Comparisons to previous results are also presented.

Brandon Hoffmann↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Estimation of End-of-Life Solar Absorptivity for Complex, Multi-Phased Space Missions

Solar absorptivity degradation over time is an important contributor to the thermal performance of a spacecraft at the end of its life. When environments are complex and include many different factors known to impact solar absorptivity degradation, such as UV, charged particles, contamination, or lunar dust coverage, combining data from several different studies can be done to estimate total degradation. While the most conservative way is to stack delta absorptivity from each factor to come up with a total delta, this may be overly conservative for long or complex missions with multiple mission phases. As absorptivity increases the rate of degradation decreases, and synergistic effects need to be taken into account. In this report an alternate method is proposed using Gateway materials as an example. This method determines which environmental factor will be dominant at what time (such as contamination or charged particles) and uses that degradation rate for that mission phase. For the next mission phase, the new absorptivity can be used instead of the original BOL absorptivity to determine degradation rate. This approach prevents overestimating optical degradation when considering degradation from interconnected sources.

Brandon Michael Hoffmann↗