Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Adelman, H. G.

Publications and source records attributed to Adelman, H. G..

Preliminary Studies of a Pulsed Detonation Rocket Engine

In the new era of space exploration, there is a strong need for more efficient, cheaper and more reliable propulsion devices. With dramatic increase in specific impulse, the overall mass of fuel to be lifted into orbit is decreased, and this leads, in turn, to much lower mass requirements at lift-off, higher payload ratios and lower launch costs. The Pulsed Detonation engine (PDE) has received much attention lately due to its unique combination of simplicity, light-weight and efficiency. Current investigations focus principally on its use as a low speed, airbreathing engine, although other applications have also been proposed. Its use as a rocket propulsion device was first proposed in 1988 by the present authors. The superior efficiency of the Pulsed Detonation Rocket Engine (PDRE) is due to the near constant volume combustion process of a detonation wave. Our preliminary estimates suggest that the PDRE is theoretically capable of achieving specific impulses as high as 720 sec, a dramatic improvement over the current 480 sec of conventional rocket engines, making it competitive with nuclear thermal rockets. In addition to this remarkable efficiency, the PDRE may eliminate the need for high pressure cryogenic turbopumps, a principal source of failures. The heat transfer rates are also much lower, eliminating the need for nozzle cooling. Overall, the engine is more reliable and has a much lower weight. This paper will describe in detail the operation of the PDRE and calculate its performance, through numerical simulations. Engineering issues will be addressed and discussed, and the impact on mission profiles will also be presented. Finally, the performance of the PDRE using in-situ resources, such as CO and O2 from the martian atmosphere, will also be computed.

Cambier, Jean-Luc↗

Aerothermodynamics of transatmospheric vehicles

A transatmospheric vehicle (TAV) using airbreathing propulsion requires a long acceleration period within the denser part of the atmosphere to reach orbital speed. The long flight time, coupled with the need for a low-drag configuration, results in severe heating of parts of the vehicle. The ascent peak stagnation point and wing leading edge equilibrium wall temperatures are about 3500 K and 2500 K, respectively, likely requiring some form of mass addition cooling. The corresponding temperatures during entry are 1000 K lower. The vehicle windward centerline temperatures are more moderate, with values peaking around 1300 K during both ascent and entry. Therefore, radiative cooling should be effective over large areas of the vehicle. The windward centerline heat loads during entry are comparable to those for low acceleration ascent trajectories. However, ascent heat loads for the stagnation point and the wing leading edge are about three times higher than those during entry. For comparison, the entry heat load for the TAV's stagnation point is about three times higher than the value for Shuttle. Therefore the ascent heat load at the TAV's stagnation point exceeds the Shuttle's entry value by an order of magnitude.

Tauber, M. E.↗

Predicted exhaust emissions from a methanol and jet fueled gas turbine combustor

A computer model of a gas turbine combustor has been used to predict the kinetic combustion and pollutant formation processes for methanol and simulated jet fuel. Use of the kinetic reaction mechanisms has also allowed a study of ignition delay and flammability limit of these two fuels. The NOX emissions for methanol were predicted to be from 69 to 92% lower than those for jet fuel at the same equivalence ratio which is in agreement with experimentally observed results. The high heat of vaporization of methanol lowers both the combustor inlet mixture temperatures and the final combustion temperatures. The lower combustion temperatures lead to low NOX emissions while the lower inlet mixture temperatures increase methanol's ignition delay. This increase in ignition delay dictates the lean flammability limit of methanol to be 0.8, while jet fuel is shown to combust at 0.4.

Adelman, H. G.↗