Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Alexander Schepelmann

Publications and source records attributed to Alexander Schepelmann.

6 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2022

Characterization of Infrared Optical Motion Tracking System in NASA's Simulated Lunar Operations (SLOPE) Laboratory

This work characterizes the accuracy of a 16 camera OptiTrack motion tracking system installed in NASA Glenn Research Center's Simulated Lunar Operations (SLOPE) laboratory. The position of a rigid body mounted on a motorized linear stage is compared to its position reported by the motion tracking system as it travels through the facility's 777m$^3$ capture volume of interest. Experiments show that the mean error reported by the motion tracking system for the aggregate capture volume is in-line with independent measurements collected using the motion stage. Error within regions of the capture volume exceed the mean error reported by the motion tracking system, likely due to occlusion, and suggests that additional cameras should be used to increase measurement accuracy in these regions. Overall, results show that error values reported by the motion tracking system are representative of the measurement error in a collected data set and validates the system's use for characterizing the mobility and tractive performance of robots, rovers, and other vehicles for planetary exploration.

Motion capture↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

A Framework for Optimization-Based ISRU Tool Design Using Discrete Element Modeling

Novel robotic excavation technologies are needed to perform in-situ resource utilization (ISRU) tasks at levels required to sustain a long-term presence on the lunar surface. Developing and testing multiple iterations of functional hardware is time and cost prohibitive, thus slowing down the pace of progress and delaying humanity’s settlement of the Moon. High-fidelity, physics-based simulation can reduce the time and effort required to develop and deploy robotic systems [1]. We have adopted this approach to create high-fidelity models of robotic test hardware to enable rapid virtual design and optimization of excavation technologies [2]. Such models can leverage modern computational tools like Discrete Element Method (DEM) simulations that can be coupled with automated design approaches like topology optimization to reduce the amount of prototyping and physical testing needed to realize useful tools.

ISRU↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Parametric Mechanism Design Through Numerical Optimization and Physics Simulation

Design-Build-Test approaches for developing spaceflight hardware are prohibitively time and cost intensive and often lead to suboptimal mechanism designs. Approaches that couple machine learning and high-fidelity physics simulation could eliminate the need for hardware prototyping and dramatically accelerate the engineering design cycle, ultimately reducing cost. This work presents a modular NASA-developed toolchain to optimize hardware mechanisms in a virtual environment using numerical optimization and multi-body physics simulation. The toolchain enables multi-objective optimization, generates parametric CAD files that can be further post-processed by an end user, and can be expanded to optimize full systems and non-mechanical parameters such as feedback control variables. We demonstrate the toolchain through an independently verifiable design problem that optimizes wheel radius to achieve a desired linear velocity in a rigid-body physics environment when the wheel rotates at a constant angular speed, and then post-process the parametric CAD file of the optimal design generated by the tool before ultimately manufacturing it via 3D printing. We end with a discussion of how the toolchain can incorporate other analysis tools, including finite element analysis, computational fluid dynamics, and granular media simulations.

Optimization↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

An Optimization-Based Toolchain for Parametric Mechanism Design

Design-Build-Test approaches for developing spaceflight hardware are prohibitively time and cost intensive and often lead to suboptimal mechanism designs. Approaches that couple machine learning and high-fidelity physics simulation could eliminate the need for hardware prototyping and dramatically accelerate the engineering design cycle, ultimately reducing cost. This work presents a modular NASA-developed toolchain to optimize hardware mechanisms in a virtual environment using numerical optimization and multi-body physics simulation. The toolchain enables multi-objective optimization, generates parametric CAD files that can be further post-processed by an end user, and can be expanded to optimize full systems and non-mechanical parameters such as feedback control variables. We demonstrate the toolchain through an independently verifiable design problem that optimizes wheel radius to achieve a desired linear velocity in a rigid-body physics environment when the wheel rotates at a constant angular speed, and then post-process the parametric CAD file of the optimal design generated by the tool before ultimately manufacturing it via 3D printing. We end with a discussion of how the toolchain can incorporate other analysis tools, including finite element analysis, computational fluid dynamics, and granular media simulations.

Optimization↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Optimization-Based Parametric Design via High-Fidelity Simulation: Overview + Examples

Design-Build-Test approaches for developing spaceflight hardware are prohibitively time and cost intensive and often lead to suboptimal mechanism designs. Approaches that couple machine learning and high-fidelity physics simulation could eliminate the need for hardware prototyping and dramatically accelerate the engineering design cycle, ultimately reducing cost. This talk presents a modular NASA-developed toolchain to optimize hardware mechanisms in a virtual environment using numerical optimization and multi-body physics simulation and includes example applications related to rigid wheel design for autonomous rovers and computational fluid dynamics.

optimization↗