Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Alexei Ivanovich Lyapustin

Publications and source records attributed to Alexei Ivanovich Lyapustin.

7 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2021

A Comparison of Multi-Angle Implementation of Atmospheric Correction and MOD09 Daily Surface Reflectance Products from MODIS

This study presents the first systematic comparison of MAIAC Collection 6 MCD19A1 daily surface reflectance (SR) product with standard MODIS SR (MOD/MYD09). The study was limited to four tiles located in mid-Atlantic United States (H11V05), Canada (H12V03),central Amazon (H11V09), and North-Eastern China (H27V05) and used over 5000 MODIS granules in 2018. Overall, there is a remarkable agreement between the best quality pixels of the two products, in particular in the Red and NIR bands. Over selected tiles, the evaluation found that MAIAC provides from 4 to 25% more high-quality retrievals thanMOD09 annually, with the largest difference in tropical regions, confirming results of the previous studies. The comparison of spectral characteristics showed a systematic MAIAC-MOD09 difference increasing from NIR to Blue, typical of biases of a Lambertian assumption in MOD09 algorithm. Over the North-Eastern China, MCD19A1 SR is found more stable at wide range of aerosol optical depth (AOD) variations, whereasMOD09 SR shows a consistent positive bias increasing with AOD and at shorter wavelengths. The observed SR differences can be attributed to differences in cloud detection, aerosol retrieval and in atmospheric correction which is performed using an accurate BRDF-coupled radiative transfer model in MAIAC and a Lambertian surface model in MOD09. While this study is not representative of the global performance because of its limited geographical coverage, it should help the land community to better understand the differences between the two products.

MAIAC↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

GeoNEX: A Geostationary Earth Observatory

The latest generation of geostationary satellites (Himawari 8/9, GOES-16/17, FY-4, GK-2A) carries sensors that closely mimic the spatial and spectral characteristics of widely used polar-orbiting, global monitoring sensors such as MODIS and VIIRS. When combined, data from various currently operating/planned geostationary platforms provide a geo-ring of hyper-temporal (5-10 minutes), multispectral observations at spatial resolutions as high as 500 m. These high frequency observations offer exciting new possibilities for monitoring our planet, including better retrievals of geophysical variables by overcoming cloud cover, enabling studies of diurnally varying phenomena in the atmosphere, land, and the oceans, and support operational decision-making in agriculture, hydrology and disaster management. The NASA Earth Exchange (NEX) team, in collaboration with scientists from JAXA, KARI, NOAA and other international institutions, created the GeoNEX (www.nasa.gov/geonex) pipeline to integrate data from all available geostationary platforms and produce and distribute spatially, temporally, and radiometrically consistent data for the earth science community. We envision various institutions adapting the Geo component (e.g., GeoNOAA, GeoKARI, GeoChiba, GeoJAXA, GeoCMA) and customizing the pipeline and downstream products to serve the local/regional research and applied science communities. To facilitate collaborative work among the partners, we have established the OpenNEX platform on the public cloud. OpenNEX provides researchers, developers, educators, and ordinary users with easy access to an integrated Earth science computational and data platform, enabling citizen scientists and application developers to realize the full value of GeoNEX data assets and software tools.

GeoNEX↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Uncertainty Analysis of the GeoNEX Top-of-Atmospheric Reflectance Products Generated from the Third-Generation Geostationary Satellite Sensors

The GeoNEX (Geostationary-NASA Earth eXchange) Level-1G products consist of top-of-atmosphere (TOA) bi-directional reflectance factor (BRF) and brightness temperature generated with data streams from the latest geostationary (GEO) sensors including GOES-16/17 ABI, Himawari-8/9 AHI, and GK-2A AMI on a global tiled common grid (60oN-60o and 180oW-180oE) in geographic coordinates. With their 16 spectral bands, 0.01o/0.02o nadir spatial resolution, and 10-minute temporal resolutions, these products provide exciting opportunity to monitor Earth surface processes. However, the unique Sun-Target-Satellite geometry of geostationary sensors demands special attention in analyzing/interpreting these datasets. In this study we present a systematic analysis on the relationship between the radiometric uncertainties of the GeoNEX TOA reflectance and the corresponding solar/satellite zenith angles. We show that the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the BRF are positively proportional to the square roots of the cosine of solar illuminating zenith angles. That is, the BRF data are noisier earlier in the morning or later in the afternoon than in the mid of the day. The cosine of satellite viewing zenith angles do not directly influence the SNR of the TOA BRF. However, they positively regulate the relative importance of the surface component in the TOA BRF. This means that variations in surface reflectance are more difficult to detect for pixels with larger view zenith angles, even when the SNR of the TOA BRF is the same. We are developing metrics to specify such illumination-view geometry related uncertainties in the GeoNEX L1G TOA BRF products so that this key information can be easily accessed by the user community.

Geostationary satellite↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Generation of Land Surface Reflectance with Combined Geo-KOMPSAT-2A AMI and Himawari 8 AHI Observations

The latest generation of geostationary satellites has opened a new era of Earth observations with unprecedented spatiotemporal resolution and spectral range. Together with GOES 16/17 ABI, FY4-A AGRI, and Himawari-8 AHI, a new Korean geostationary satellite (Geo-KOMPSAT-2A AMI) has operationally collected a full-disk image in 16 channels every ten minutes since July 2019, allowing diurnal land surface monitoring over a large proportion of Asia and all of Oceania. Retrieving accurate surface reflectance (SR) over land from GK-2A/AMI is a challenging but high priority objective. One of the challenges is the absence of a spectral band in the 2.2 m SWIR range from AMI, which is required by many atmospheric correction algorithms to retrieve atmospheric aerosol properties. To remedy this issue, we adopt a strategy that combines concurrent GK-2A/AMI and Himawari 8/AHI observations in order to derive AMI SR. We have adapted the NASA Multi-Angle Implementation of Atmospheric Correction (MAIAC) algorithm to process the data stream from Himawari 8/AHI. The advantages of the MAIAC algorithm is its capability to exploit the high temporal frequency and varying illumination geometry of the geostationary data for advanced cloud/snow detection, aerosol retrieval, and characterization of surface bidirectional reflectance properties. Leveraging the similarities of spectral bands and the sun-target-sensor geometry between AMI and AHI, we are able to create denser time series of observations and enhanced BRDF samples over most of the spatial coverage of AMI (and AHI). The combined stereo-type observations not only help derive SR for AMI but also enhance retrievals of the corresponding AHI surface products. We evaluate the resulting AMI SR using ground (AERONET) observations and corresponding MODIS products. Further, we discuss potential challenges in utilizing the geostationary satellite data for land surface monitoring.

geostationary satellite↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Fusing GeoNEX and VIIRS Surface BRDF Retrievals: Exploring a GEO-LEO Synergy

The Bidirectional Reflectance Distribution Function or BRDF, which describes the dependency of surface reflectance on the illumination-view geometries, are the foundation of many high-level satellite products for terrestrial and aquatic system monitoring. The latest geostationary sensors like GOES ABI provide high frequent (~10 minutes) observations of the Earth surface that feature continuously changing sun angles, allowing us to retrieve surface BRDF with dedicated atmospheric correction algorithms like MAIAC (Multi-Angle Implementation of Atmospheric Correction). For mid-latitude locations, because geostationary satellites have fixed view angles in the back-scattering directions, the angular sampling of surface BRDF by GEO sensors is not comprehensive. This study explores a GEO-LEO synergy to address this issue. We first extract concurrent GeoNEX and VIIRS BRDF data with the best quality (cloud-free and low aerosol loading) at chosen AERONET sites. We then compare the magnitude and the shape factors of the two set of BRDF parameters as well as their variations through the season. We calculate the “distances” between the GeoNEX and VIIRS BRDF by using them to cross-predict the top-of-atmosphere reflectance measured by their counterpart and evaluating the corresponding prediction errors. This metric allows us to derive a set of optimized BRDF parameters that minimize such distances or prediction errors, which are considered as the fused BRDF result. We validate the algorithm with reserved AERONET data and then apply it to generate the GEO-LEO BRDF synergy over CONUS. We expect the fused BRDF to have reduced uncertainties as compared to the source GeoNEX or VIIRS data and may find broadly application in deriving other high-level satellite products.

Geostationary satellite↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Fusing Surface BRDF from Geostationary and Polar-Orbiting Satellite Sensors

The bi-directional reflectance distribution function (BRDF) describes the fundamental optical property of a surface and therefore has been retrieved from both geostationary (GEO) and polar-orbiting (or Low-Earth Orbit, LEO) satellite observations. In theory, although GEO and LEO observations feature different illumination-view geometries, they reflect the same physical property and the retrieved BRDF should be mutually consistent. This fact also suggests that we may derive a better BRDF product by synergistically fusing the GEO and LEO datasets. Here we demonstrate the idea by fusing Terra/Aqua MODIS and GOES16/17 ABI surface BRDF with the Multi-Angle Implementation of Atmospheric Correction (MAIAC) algorithm. Our processing is implemented in two steps. First, we compile and project both MODIS and ABI data on the same GeoNEX common grid, and then use the MODIS MAIAC BRDF (MCD19A3) as the prior information to perform atmospheric correction of ABI data and retrieve surface BRDF with the ABI MAIAC code. In the second step, we run the MAIAC code in the forward mode to simulate MODIS and ABI TOA radiances from the jointly retrieved surface BRDF and the corresponding illumination-view geometries. By comparing the simulated TOA radiances with corresponding observations (e.g., MOD02 and ABI05), we can quantitatively evaluate whether the jointly retrieved ABI surface BRDF improves over the separately retrieved MODIS and ABI BRDF products. We expect that the jointly retrieved BRDF data are more robust than the standard products and can help us reduce uncertainties in higher-level earth observation satellite products.

Geostationary satellite↗