Engineering topics

Allen, Jan L.

Publications and source records attributed to Allen, Jan L..

3 records

DOE OSTI2022

Highly reversible Zn metal anode enabled by sustainable hydroxyl chemistry

Rechargeable Zn metal batteries (RZMBs) may provide a more sustainable and lower-cost alternative to established battery technologies in meeting energy storage applications of the future. However, the most promising electrolytes for RZMBs are generally aqueous and require high concentrations of salt(s) to bring efficiencies toward commercially viable levels and mitigate water-originated parasitic reactions including hydrogen evolution and corrosion. Electrolytes based on nonaqueous solvents are promising for avoiding these issues, although full cell performance demonstrations with solvents other than water have been very limited. To address these challenges, we investigated MeOH as an alternative electrolyte solvent. These MeOH-based electrolytes exhibited exceptional Zn reversibility over a wide temperature range, with a Coulombic efficiency > 99.5% at 50% Zn utilization without cell short-circuit behavior for > 1,800 h. More important, this remarkable performance translates well to Zn || metal-free organic cathode full cells, supporting < 6% capacity decay after > 800 cycles at –40°C.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

DOE OSTI2020

Structural Changes and Reversibility Upon Deintercalation of Li from LiCoPO 4 Derivatives

In an effort to improve the cycle life and rate capability of olivine LiCoPO 4 , Cr, Fe, and Si were added to produce nominal Li 1.025 Co 0.84 Fe 0.10 Cr 0.05 Si 0.01 (PO 4 ) 1.025 . This cathode material has an energy density comparable to LiCoPO 4 , with markedly improved electrochemical performance. Here, we apply operando X-ray diffraction to gain an understanding of the crystallographic delithiation mechanism of this new substituted electrode material, compared to both LiCo 0.75 Fe 0.25 PO 4 and LiCo 0.75 Fe 0.25 PO 4 . Throughout charging, the extent of solid-solution domains was significantly increased in Li 1.025 Co 0.84 Fe 0.10 Cr 0.05 Si 0.01 (PO 4 ) 1.025 and LiCo 0.75 Fe 0.25 PO 4 compared to LiCoPO 4 . These domains reduce the mechanical strain during electrode function, providing a clear explanation for the high durability with Co substitution. Li 1.025 Co 0.84 Fe 0.10 Cr 0.05 Si 0.01 (PO 4 ) 1.025 operated at notably higher average potential than LiCo 0.75 Fe 0.25 PO 4 , which would increase the energy density of the cell. Ex situ measurements reveal the persistence of structural irreversibilities in the substituted phase after the first cycle, identifying avenues for further improvement in durability. Overall, this finding sheds light on the strategies for judicious cation substitution in LiCoPO 4 electrodes to maximize the cycle life while preserving high energy density, especially compared to LiFePO 4 .

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

NASA NTRS2017

Factors Limiting Li+ Charge Transfer Kinetics in Li-ion Batteries

Understanding the factors limiting Li+ charge transfer kinetics in Li-ion batteries is essential in improving the rate performance, especially at lower temperatures. The Li+ charge transfer process involved in the lithium intercalation of graphite anode includes the step of de-solvation of the solvated Li+ in the liquid electrolyte and the step of transport of Li+ in the preformed solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) on electrodes until the Li+ accepts an electron at the electrode and becomes a Li in the electrode. Whether the de-solvation process or the Li+ transport through the SEI is a limiting step depends on the nature of the interphases at the electrode and electrolyte interfaces. Several examples involving the electrode materials such as graphite, lithium titanate (LTO), lithium iron phosphate (LFP), lithium nickel cobalt aluminum oxide (NCA) and solid Li+ conductor such as lithium lanthanum titanate or Li-Al-Ti-phosphate are reviewed and discussed to clarify the conditions at which either the de-solvation or the transport of Li+ in SEI is dominating and how the electrolyte components affect the activation energy of Li+ charge transfer kinetics. How the electrolyte additives impact the Li+ charge transfer kinetics at both the anode and the cathode has been examined at the same time in 3-electrode full cells. The resulting impact on Li+ charge transfer resistance, Rct, and activation energy, Ea, at both electrodes are reported and discussed.

Delp, Samuel A.↗