Running the numbers on plant synthetic biology solutions to global problems
Not Available
Biochemistry & Molecular Biology↗
Engineering topics
Amthor, Jeffrey S.
Publications and source records attributed to Amthor, Jeffrey S..
Why cutting respiratory CO 2 loss from crops is possible, practicable, and prudential
Abstract Plants release back to the atmosphere about half of the CO 2 they capture by photosynthesis. Decreasing the rate of crop respiration could therefore potentially increase yields, store more carbon in the soil and draw down atmospheric CO 2 . However, decreasing respiration rate has had very little research effort compared to increasing photosynthesis, the historically dominant metabolic paradigm for crop improvement. Conceptual and technical advances, particularly in protein turnover and directed enzyme evolution, have now opened ways to trim the large fraction of respiration that fuels proteome maintenance by lowering the breakdown and resynthesis rates of enzymes and other proteins. In addition to being theoretically possible and practicable, exploring the reduction of respiration is prudential, given that it (i) has barely yet been tried and (ii) could help meet the challenges of sustaining crop productivity and managing atmospheric carbon.
Joshi, Jaya↗
Respiratory energy demands and scope for demand expansion and destruction
Photosynthesis is the primary energy input to plants, but most plant metabolic processes are powered much or all of the time by ATP and NAD(P)H that come from respiratory oxidation of photosynthetically produced carbohydrates, that is, “dark respiration” (Amthor, 1994). The processes of growth, nutrient uptake and assimilation, active transport, and maintenance are thus all clients of respiration and compete for their share of a respiratory energy budget that is capped by photosynthate income. The economic principle of opportunity cost applies to these clients’ competing demands: spending respiratory energy on process A means missing the benefit of investing that energy in process B (Mahmoudabadi et al., 2019). This principle is key to assessing prospects for crop improvement by metabolic engineering. As de Lorenzo (2015) put it: “metabolism…frames and ultimately resolves whether a given genetic program (existing…or engineered) can be deployed or not.” Foreign or reconfigured native processes bolted on to a crop-plant’s metabolic chassis must compete for respiratory energy with native ones without crashing the energy economy. A proviso on plant carbon budgets is that photosynthetic carbon fixation (“source activity”) can in certain cases increase to meet increased carbon demand (“sink activity”), that is, budget envelopes are not always fixed (Smith et al., 2018). However, as there is some consensus that productivity is most often limited or co-limited by carbon supply (Ainsworth and Long, 2005; Körner, 2015; Sonnewald and Fernie, 2018), we make this our basal assumption in the analyses below.
59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES↗