Engineering topics

Andrew S. Thelen

Publications and source records attributed to Andrew S. Thelen.

4 records

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Fixed- and Free-Mode Flutter Derivatives during Aeroelastic Optimization

Aeroelastic flutter design derivatives may be approximated by ignoring the sensitivity of the structural mode shapes. This “fixed-mode” derivative is less-expensive to compute than the exact “free-mode” derivative (which accommodates the mode shape dependency), but also may provide inaccurate sensitivities for optimization. This work formulates both fixed- and free-mode flutter derivatives, and demonstrates the conditions under which they are equivalent. Two different types of fixed-mode derivatives are also developed in this work. Using a cantilevered-plate demonstration problem with both shape and sizing design parameters, the accuracy of the free-mode derivative and the two fixed-mode derivatives, are all demonstrated via gradient-based optimization.

Bret K. Stanford↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Linearized Frequency-Domain Gust Analysis and Adjoint-Based Sensitivities

Gust analysis is added to a linearized frequency-domain method in FUN3D, a NASA computational fluid dynamics solver. The method linearizes about a nonlinear static equilibrium condition and is therefore appropriate for problems with small perturbations such as transonic stochastic gust analysis. In addition to the gust analysis, adjoint-based sensitivities of stochastic gust constraints are implemented for multidisciplinary design optimization. The linearized frequency-domain gust model and adjoint-based sensitivities are described and verified. The method is applied to an optimization for mass minimization of the AGARD 445.6 wing subject to a stochastic gust constraint limiting the displacement of the wing tip.

Aeroelasticity↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Flutter and Stochastic Gust Constraint Studies of the Undeflected CRM using MPhys

Aircraft design must ultimately address gust and flutter characteristics to achieve airworthiness. As modern aircraft continue to become more lightweight and flexible, these aeroelastic phenomena are more likely to drive the design process and should thus be considered early. Designing for ride quality due to typical gust spectra is also of interest to ensure a smooth passenger experience. The present work demonstrates the new implementation of stochastic gust constraints in MPhys/OpenMDAO, in addition to flutter and static stress constraints, among others. Design studies are shown for the NASA Common Research Model, including both fuel burn minimization as well as multiobjective optimization of fuel burn and landing gross weight. Two sets of optimization problems are covered, differing mainly by the gust quantity of interest, which include tip displacement and root bending moment. Fuel burn penalties imposed by the flutter and gust constraints are also discussed.

aeroelasticity↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Gradient-Based Optimization of the Common Research Model Wing Subject to CFD-Based Gust and Flutter Constraints

The linearized frequency-domain method was recently implemented in the stabilized finite element solver in NASA’s FUN3D code. Previous work by the authors used this method for enforcing flutter constraints during gradient-based optimizations. More recently, the solver was expanded to account for continuous (also known as stochastic) gust responses. This paper expands on recent Common Research Model wing optimization work, which demonstrated gradient-based optimization with flutter and stochastic gust constraints, among others. While that work utilized FUN3D for static aeroelastic solutions but relied on doublet lattice aerodynamics for gust and flutter responses, the present work replaces these unsteady aerodynamic analyses with those of FUN3D’s linearized frequency-domain solver. With analytic derivatives available, gradient-based optimization is performed through the use of the OpenMDAO/MPhys libraries with over 700 shape, structural, and aerodynamic design variables and over 10 nonlinear constraints. Comparisons of analysis results and optimized designs are made between doublet lattice and linearized frequency-domain solutions.

aeroelasticity↗