Archipley, Corey C. | Search NASA

DOE OSTI2022

Methane liquefaction with an active magnetic regenerative refrigerator

This manuscript reports liquefaction of methane using an active magnetic regenerative refrigerator (AMRR). The AMRR used to cool from 285 K to 135 K has two identical regenerators fabricated with adjacent layers of four ferromagnetic refrigerants, each with sequentially lower Curie temperatures and lesser masses from hot to cold temperatures. The dual multilayer regenerators were assembled in opposition with a single cold region between them. For this set of experiments equal mass of helium gas was pumped through all layers of the regenerators during the two flow steps of the four-step AMR cycle. After successfully reaching 135 K, a compact condensing coil-fin tube heat exchanger (HEX) with a small storage vessel was mounted in the cold region of the dual regenerator assembly to be cooled during the hot-to-cold helium flow from alternatively demagnetized regenerators. The cold HEX was used to cool and liquefy a process stream of methane gas supplied at 295 K and different pressures in different runs. Further, by measuring time to liquefy a known volume of methane at three different pressures, cooling powers of the AMRR as a function of temperature were determined. The resultant data were compared to those predicted by the AMRR performance model. Conclusions from these experiments and suggestions for future work are presented.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗

DOE OSTI2020

Highly Efficient Magnetocaloric Natural Gas Liquefaction (Final Report)

Over the twelve-month project the following achievements were accomplished: • Liquefication of methane as primary component of natural gas was accomplished with a magnetocaloric liquefier (MCL) prototype. This was the first time an MCL was used to liquefy methane. • Improved MCL designs were completed. • Cooling to 135 K from room temperature was achieved for the first time in a single MCL stage with dual, reciprocating four-layer regenerators. • Techno-economic analysis for a multi-stage 5 tonne/day magnetocaloric liquefier was completed. The detailed thermodynamic analysis of this MCL design showed a figure of merit (FOM) of 0.6 was achievable. This is a ~2x improvement over current state of the art. • Cost of an efficient 5 tonne/day LNG multi-stage liquefier was projected to be ~$\$$3.1 MM for the 5 tonne/day MCL with achievable design assumptions. • Market study of U.S. merchant LNG demand by energy sector was completed showing that at beginning of 2019, total use was ~2.5 million gallons/day primarily in three sectors that was filled by ~20 small companies in the merchant LNG supply business producing ~2.3 million gpd. These data exclude LNG produced at dedicated peak shaving and large export plants. • Business case for MCL technology based on LNG market study was completed showing the high FOM feature of MCL reduces cost of plant power, and lower capital cost reduces debt repayment and plant depreciation operating expenses. However, today’s demand for U.S. merchant LNG in most sectors is satisfied with conventional technology. Further, with today’s extremely low natural gas (NG) feedstock costs (e.g., ~$\$$1.8/MMBtu), the cost of fuel for NG gensets and for LNG feedstock is already very low. Therefore, possible new merchant LNG liquefier plant developers anticipating demand growth in the transportation, industrial, and electricity generation sectors do not obtain sufficient cost benefits to adopt new, commercially unproven MCL technology. • Other market factors such as remoteness from existing NG pipelines, or unfilled or unsatisfied applications such as boil-off gas re-liquefaction in LNG vessels, or policy factors such as some form of emissions-related fees may make lower capital costs and higher FOM of MCL technology attractive for new small-scale (~50 tonne/day) LNG plants. Two potentially attractive niche markets for MCL technology were identified: i) re-liquefaction of boil-off gas from large LNG transport vessels where severe transport conditions are problematic for conventional technology; and ii) providing LNG in distributed-scale plants that eliminate road transport costs to meet diverse, smaller-scale, distributed LNG bunkering fuel demands. By eliminating significant cryogenic tanker delivery costs and create an attractive cost-savings benefit with small-scale MCL plants.

03 NATURAL GAS↗