Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Arm, Stuart T.

Publications and source records attributed to Arm, Stuart T..

Technical Information Needs and Regulatory Considerations for Front-End Transportation Activities of HALEU Fuel Feed Material

This report fulfills task order number 31310022F0033 Task 1 Assessment of technical information needs and considerations for front-end transportation activities for HALEU fuel feed material. This assessment primarily focuses on the transportation outlook and packaging requirements for transporting high-assay low-enriched uranium (HALEU) fuel feed material. The regulatory framework is described in section 3.0. In section 4.0 the specific issues associated with reviewing HALEU feed material packages are discussed. The rest of the report discusses the need for new packages and Department of Energy progress on HALEU production. Through this evaluation it is shown that the 5% enrichment barrier between low-enriched uranium and HALEU is a significant challenge to transportation packaging. However, there are licensed designs and concepts that can be used to transport HALEU feedstock. No significant issues were identified through the HALEU range up to 20% enriched.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Concepts for Actinide Recovery from TRISO Used Nuclear Fuel

The work described in this report has developed a preliminary conceptual flowsheet based on limited published literature for the head-end of a TRISO oxycarbide UNF reprocessing plant. The essential function of the head-end is to prepare the UNF for subsequent separation of actinides. The main steps of the conceptual TRISO UNF head-end reprocessing flowsheet are: 1. Fragmentation of the graphite moderator to expose the fuel particles. 2. Separation of fuel particles from fragmented graphite moderator by sieving and fluidization. 3. Fragmentation of the fuel particles to expose the fuel kernel. 4. Dissolution of the fuel kernel in nitric acid. Noteworthy at this step is the formation of organic acids (mainly oxalic and mellitic acids) from the carbon associated with the fuel and TRISO coatings. These acids can interfere with actinide separations and solvent extraction hydraulic performance and carbon dioxide gas generation. 5. Clarification of the dissolved fuel solution to separate the coating fragments. 6. Dissolver off-gas treatment with specific emphasis on managing generation of carbon dioxide gas containing carbon-14. The quantity of carbon dioxide is projected to be 100 to 1000 times greater than that arising from dissolving LWR UNF. Pre or post treatment of the exposed fuel kernels could be undertaken to mitigate the formation of organic acids but there still exists a significant off-gas treatment challenge. The literature on reprocessing uranium nitride UNF was reviewed but a flowsheet was not specifically developed since its scope and uncertainties are expected to be encompassed by the oxycarbide flowsheet. Overall, the predominant feature of processing TRISO UNF is carbon management to reduce waste volume and mitigate the formation of carbon dioxide and organic acids. This report recommends broad areas of research that will help to further define the head-end flowsheet.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Modeling Non-UO2 Fuel With UNF-ST&DARDS

The U.S. Department of Energy’s Used Nuclear Fuel-Storage, Transportation & Disposal Analysis Resource and Data System (UNF-ST&DARDS) provides an easy-to-use interface to analyze irradiated UO2 fuel by allowing all analysis to be performed within the software and being able to store and use dozens of fuel assembly, canister, and cask designs [1]. However, performing these same analyses with non-UO2 fuel, such as UN or U3Si2, requires more user intervention in the process. This work uses UN, UN-ZrO2, and U3Si2 fuel to demonstrate how to perform criticality analyses in the current versions of UNF-ST&DARDS and how a non-UO2 fuel will compare to UO2. This work is part of a larger effort that also includes shielding and thermal analyses, but they will not be discussed.

Ivanusa, Pavlo↗

Feasibility of Pulsed Current Technology for Removing Bulk Carbon from TRISO-based Fuels

The work described in this report has evaluated the technical feasibility of maturing the pulsed current technology and its full-scale application to processing TRISO used nuclear fuel. No insurmountable technological or safety barriers were identified to successfully maturing the technology to the fourth TRL, which was considered appropriate for a DOE-NE program. The authors recommend DOE-NE’s Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Supply Chain Office should pursue the technology on that basis. In the immediate future, the authors recommend DOE-NE’s Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Supply Chain Office should acquire non-radioactive surrogate and natural uranium TRISO compacts and pebbles as they become available from commercial vendors. These surrogates could then be used to mature the pulsed current technology.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Plan for Developing TRISO Fuel Processing Technologies

This Plan demonstrates the availability of technologies for processing TRISO used nuclear fuel for waste management and actinide recovery purposes. These technologies are judged to be at a very low level of technology readiness and as such they constitute a fertile research area for the DOE-NE’s Office of Materials and Chemical Technologies. Strategies to mature the technologies to a point where they can reasonably be considered in engineering alternatives analyses typically involve laboratory-scale tests using fuel simulant to characterize process streams and demonstrate key engineering features. Several criteria are available to help selecting candidate technologies for further maturation

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗