Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Ashkanani, Husain

Publications and source records attributed to Ashkanani, Husain.

6 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2023

Performance of hydrophobic physical solvents for pre-combustion CO 2 capture at a pilot scale coal gasification facility

Here, in this paper, we present the first pilot plant data for hydrophobic physical solvents for CO 2 and H 2 S removal from coal-derived H 2 -rich syngas. Four physical solvents were tested under pre-combustion CO 2 capture conditions at bench scale and pilot plant scale: one baseline hydrophilic solvent and three hydrophobic solvents. The solvents were: (1) polyethylene-glycol-dimethyl ether (PEGDME), a hydrophilic solvent analog for the commercial process Selexol, (2) tributyl- phosphate (TBP), a commercially available hydrophobic solvent, (3) polyethylene glycol-poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PEG-PDMS-3), and (4) diethyl sebacate (CASSH-1), a novel, computationally screened hydrophobic solvent developed by the National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL). All solvents were studied under pure gas (CO 2 /N 2 /H 2 /CH 4 ) equilibrium conditions at NETL followed by pilot plant testing with syngas at the University of North Dakota Energy & Environmental Research Center (UND EERC). Long term performance of CASSH-1 and PEDGME was then assessed with results compared to process simulation predictions. Within experimental uncertainties, all solvents showed comparable CO 2 absorption performance at above room temperature operation while the hydrophobic solvents had limited water uptake and low vapor pressure, which alleviates concerns related to corrosion, water absorption, and solvent loss to evaporation. These results indicate low viscosity, low vapor pressure hydrophobic solvents are a promising option for lower cost CO 2 capture from high pressure syngas applications.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗
DOE OSTI2020

Effect of Power Plant Capacity on the CAPEX, OPEX, and LCOC of the CO2 Capture Process in Pre-Combustion Applications - Abstract

Aspen Plus v8.8 was used to simulate the pre-combustion CO2 capture process from a typical fuel gas stream at different power plant capacities ranging from 54.3 to 543 MW. Polyethylene glycol polydimethyl siloxane (PEGPDMS-1) was used as a physical solvent to capture CO2 in a countercurrent packed-bed absorber containing a structured packing (Mellapak 250Y). The process pressure was 51.4 bar and the solvent temperature was varied from 10 to 40 <sup>o</sup>C. The internal diameter of the absorber ranged from 1.9 to 7 m and the packing height from 13.9 to 45.5 m. The physico-chemical properties were obtained and modeled using the Perturbed Chain-Statistical Associating Fluid Theory (PC-SAFT) Equation-of-State (EOS).<p> Four process constraints were imposed in Aspen Plus: (1) no flooding in the absorber, (2) the absorber height to diameter ratio (H/D) is greater than or equal 6, (3) at least 90 mol% of the CO2 capture from the fuel gas stream, and (4) the CO2 stream destined to sequestration sites should contain less than 600 ppm water concentration and less than or equal 0.5 mol% of fuel gases (H2, CO, CH4). The plant lifetime was assumed to be 30 years with an annual discount rate of 10% and an annual maintenance cost of 4% of the total capital expenses.</p><p> Seven power plants with different capacities were used and for each plant, the corresponding CO2 capture process was simulated. The absorber flooding was checked using the generalized pressure drop correlation (GPDC) by Leva [1] and the capital expenditure (CAPEX), operating expenditure (OPEX), and levelized costs per ton of CO2 captured (LCOC) were calculated [2-5]. Normalized by the largest power plant capacity (543 MW) used in the simulation, the results indicated that the capital and operating expenditures increased, however, the LCOC decreased with increasing plant capacity. This behavior was due to the increased annual tonnage of the CO2 captured with plant capacity as shown in Figure 1. The calculated CAPEX, OPEX, LCOC and the tonnage of CO2 captured for the 543 MW power plant were about 52 MM$, 22 MM$/year, 7.46 $/ton and 4 MM ton/year.</p>

Ashkanani, Husain↗