Engineering topics
Publications and source records attributed to Atkins, K. L..
Three categories comprise the major project manager (PM) responsibility. To be successful, he/she has to control quality, schedule and budget. When these come together inside an agreement with a customer/sponsor, all is well.
The STARDUST Discovery mission will collect samples of cometary and interstellar dust and return them to Earth. The Jet Propulsion Laboratory provides project management with Lockheed Martin Astronautics as the spacecraft industrial partner. STARDUST management is aggressively pursuing cost control through the use of Total Quality Management principles, specifically operating in a Project Engineering and Integration Team that
Planning for future planetary exploration missions indicates that there are continuing, long range requirements for nuclear power, and in particular radioisotope-based power sources. In meeting these requirements, there is a need for higher efficiency, lower mass systems. Four technology areas currently under development that address these goals are described: modular RTG, modular RTG with advanced thermoelectric materials, dynamic isotope power system (DIPS), and the Alkali Metal Thermoelectric Converter (AMTEC).
This paper addresses the development of a workstation that exploits automated tools to enable an operator to monitor concurrently several engineering subsystems and/or several space missions. The use of artificial intelligence and advanced graphics capabilities to achieve fast prototypes is discussed. The monitoring of engineering telemetry data from the Power and Pyro Subsystem of the Galileo spacecraft is emphasized.
Preliminary steps have been taken in a joint high-priority project between NASA and the European Space Agency, whereby a Solar Electric Propulsion System (SEPS), using ion drive of a 25-30 kilowatt power level, will be utilized for the first time, as part of the Space Transportation System, in powering a probe to be deployed toward Halley's comet in 1985 and a separate spacecraft which will rendezvous with the Temple 2 comet in 1988 and study it for one year. Unlike ballistically-launched vehicles, an unprecedented long-term interaction between the SEPS, the primary source of power and attitude control, and the spacecraft, responsible for data handling (at a rate of 10-120 kilobits per second), and command and telecommunications to earth (requiring capabilities at both X- and S-band frequencies, for dual-frequency navigational tracking), is required, as mission phases alternate between powered flight and science data-taking. Different design sensitivities are presented graphically.
Cometary rendezvous missions using ion propulsion is considered. The characteristics of the ion engine are discussed including the fuel efficiency and acceleration, and the design of the ion engine is described. The operation of the ion drive engine and an overview of its applications are presented.
The 19 page booklet discusses criteria for selecting candidates for potential comet rendezvous missions and describes possible mission opportunities for the 1985 to 2010 period.
The design of a solar-powered electric propulsion system is seen as the first step in the ultimate development of an ion drive system which might incorporate many features of a spacecraft propulsion system described in a science fiction novel written by Anderson (1970). The considered ion propulsion systems would make it possible to augment significantly the operational capabilities of space transportation systems utilizing the Shuttle orbiter in combination with a solid-propellant interim upper stage. The use of the ion drive in a number of applications is discussed, giving attention to the resulting enhancement of national space capabilities, the role of the ion drive in the space transportation system, the development and the operation of a manned space station, satellite positioning and service, the elimination of space debris objects, the study of Halley's comet, interplanetary or lunar shuttle services, and space missions involving the outer planets.
The need to shorten mission time (travel time to target planet) in missions to the outer planets prompts a search for alternatives to one-way minimum-energy transfers while continuing to minimize on-power thrusts. Gravity assists via swing-bys of inner planets are examined, with emphasis on a projected Venus-earth gravity assist (VEGA) and a combined solar electric propulsion and earth gravity assist (SEEGA). Gravity assists are also examined as essential for missions with sample returns back to earth. Possible use of such techniques in the Shuttle Interim Upper Stage (IUS) program is considered. Various SEEGA and VEGA trajectories are discussed and charted, and time lost in the launch orbit to earth re-encounter time is weighed against time gained by faster speed toward the mission destination.
The principles of spacecraft electric (ion thruster) propulsion are briefly reviewed. Attention is given to the inner and outer planet applications of electric (and solar electric) propulsion. Electric propulsion is considered as a stepping stone to nuclear electric propulsion.
This paper provides an update on solar electric-propulsion (SEP) technology by describing how SEP, as currently understood, performs relative to chemical-ballistic options on a limited set of missions for exploring the outer planets. A spacecraft design for these missions is discussed which embodies the findings of a study and development effort by NASA's Office of Space Science and Office of Advanced Systems Technology.
This paper reviews the mission applications of electric propulsion. The energy requirements of candidate high-energy missions gaining in NASA priority are used to highlight the potential of electric propulsion. Mission-propulsion interfaces are examined to point out differences between chemical and electric applications. Brief comparisons between ballistic requirements and capabilities and those of electric propulsion show that electric propulsion is presently the most practical and perhaps the only technology which can accomplish missions with these energy requirements.
It is pointed out that increasing mission complexity in the case of targets far from earth during the exploration of the solar system will be accompanied by significantly higher propulsive energy requirements. The development of an operational solar-electric propulsion (SEP) system would significantly alter high-energy mission capabilities. The utility of a moderately powered SEP on a set of missions is demonstrated, giving attention to small body missions, out-of-the-ecliptic missions, the problems of a Mercury orbiter mission, and augmented mission requirements in the case of a Saturn orbiter.
This is a two-part report on solar electric propulsion (SEP) performance sensitivity analysis. The first part describes the preliminary analysis of the SEP thrust system performance for an Encke rendezvous mission. A detailed description of thrust subsystem hardware tolerances on mission performance is included together with nominal spacecraft parameters based on these tolerances. The second part describes the method of analysis and graphical techniques used in generating the data for Part 1. Included is a description of both the trajectory program used and the additional software developed for this analysis. Part 2 also includes a comprehensive description of the use of the graphical techniques employed in this performance analysis.
A specific case is made for beginning small body exploration at the short-period comet Encke. The arguments review science rationale, interest, and selection criteria. Against this background, aspects of mission execution are considered including phasing, mission modes, and funding. Technology status and contending concepts round out the discussion and lead to recommendations for action.
The comet Encke at its apparition in 1980 is investigated as the target for a solar electric slow flyby mission having a flight time of approximately two years. Mission trade off studies are performed for two modes: namely the direct earth to Encke mode and the Venus gravity assist mode. Baseline missions for each mode are selected which flyby Encke at 4 km/s 30 days before perihelion. The direct mission baseline is investigated in detail for trajectory parameters related to spacecraft and science requirements. The Venus flyby mode can deliver the same payload with a total power requirement about 20% less than the direct mode. The cost is a longer flight time and a Venus flyby at about 500 km above the surface. One asteroid can be encountered at very close range on either mission. The asteroids available and the extra propellant required are determined.
Past studies of solar electric propulsion for outer planet orbiters have generally emphasized the advantages of flight time reduction and payload increases. However, several subtle advantages exist, which may become important in an environment of increasingly difficult requirements as ways to extend current technology are sought. These advantages accrue primarily because of the inherent capability, unique to electric propulsion, to efficiently shape a trajectory while enroute. Stressed in this paper are: the ability to meet orbital constraints due to assumed radiation belts, science flexibility in a dual launch program, increased numbers of observational passes, and the lengthening of launch periods. These are examined for years representative of relatively easy and difficult ballistic missions. The results indicate that an early investment in solar electric technology will provide a strong performance foundation for a long range outer planet exploration program which evolves from current spacecraft technology.
The feasibility of developing a solar electric multimission spacecraft (SEMMS) is examined with emphasis on understanding the effect of solar electric propulsion elements on a spacecraft system design. The applicability of Mariner, Viking, and thermoelectric outer planet spacecraft (TOPS) technologies to postulated mission/science objectives is investigated. A Mariner/Viking-based, modular spacecraft evolves which, with minimum modifications, is capable of performing a variety of interplanetary missions, including comet and asteroid rendezvous and orbit of Mercury, Jupiter, and Saturn. An early technology-evaluation flight is recommended to minimize the risk in subsequent missions.