Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

B. M. Howerton

Publications and source records attributed to B. M. Howerton.

An Improved Impedance Eduction Process for the NASA Langley GFIT

The Grazing Flow Impedance Tube (GFIT) is regularly employed to characterize the frequency response of acoustic liners through the eduction of their specific acoustic impedance. Acoustic pressures acquired in the facility are processed with various eduction methods to arrive at these impedance values. Recent implementation of the Swept-Sine Method provides much greater frequency resolution when characterizing the acoustic properties of a liner. The attendant increase in data that must be processed from this method has highlighted a need for greater efficiency in educing acoustic impedance. The current work details efforts to improve the eduction process through use of a hybrid approach that combines a Prony-based method with the Convected Helmholtz-based calculation generally used for this type of data. Comparisons of efficiency and accuracy are shown for this new hybrid approach versus earlier methods for three acoustic liners tested under various conditions in the GFIT with stepped-sine and recently implemented swept-sine sources.

Eduction↗

Benchmark Data for Evaluation of NASA Impedance Eduction Methods

Results achieved with three acoustic liner configurations are used to evaluate the effects of recent modifications to the NASA Normal Incidence Tube and Grazing Flow Impedance Tube. These include a calibration liner, a wire mesh liner, and a perforate liner. The effects of source type, source level, and mean flow Mach number on the impedances educed with these liners are explored. Existing models are used to predict the impedance for each test condition, and are compared with educed impedance spectra to determine their validity. The results suggest that educed impedances are similar for either a stepped sine or swept sine source. The predicted models are acceptable for the perforate liner, and are quite good for the calibration and wire mesh liners.

acoustic↗

Extending Acoustic Liner Bandwidth with Simple Embedded Septa

An acoustic liner design incorporating single-hole perforate septa was evaluated by the NASA Langley Liner Physics Team. The design, termed the ‘Simplified Septa’ concept, incorporates embedded septa as found in traditional, multidegree-of-freedom liners. Generally, such septa are composed of multihole perforates or porous mesh, whereas this concept uses septa with one hole per cell. An optimization scheme was employed to determine septa placement and hole diameters based on a target impedance cost function. Versions of the concept are tested in the NASA Langley Normal Incidence Tube (NIT) to determine impedance and absorption spectra for swept tonal excitation at 120 and 140 dB. Experimental results are compared to predictions from a liner model based on the Zwikker-Kosten Transmission Line (ZKTL) code and show good agreement for no-flow conditions.

acoustics↗

Acoustic Liner Drag: Measurement Uncertainty Reduction and Application to Novel Perforate Geometries

In addition to developing acoustic liner concepts and characterizing their performance, the NASA Langley Liner Physics Team has investigated issues related to liner drag. A method to quantify relative drag of liner configurations was developed and employed to understand the effects of various liner features. It was observed that perforate shape could have a marked effect on the measured liner drag and led to the discovery of a low-drag geometry that cut the drag penalty between a perforate and a smooth wall by approximately 50%. Investigations of novel perforates to further reduce drag were stymied by measurement uncertainty that prevented further resolution of drag differences between configurations. The current study details efforts to understand the causes of this uncertainty and describe changes made to testing methods to reduce it. Previously evaluated perforates were retested with these improvements in the NASA Langley Grazing Flow Impedance Tube to determine their relative drag at a flow speed of Mach 0.5 without acoustic excitation. Their performance was compared to the previously identified low-drag geometry to see if further drag reductions could be realized.

drag↗