Comparative Dissolution of Iron-Bearing Minerals by Catecholate and Hydroxamate Siderophores under Oxic and Anoxic Conditions
Siderophores play a crucial role in biological iron (Fe) acquisition and mobilization by promoting Fe mineral and rock weathering. While the effects of the hydroxamate siderophore desferrioxamine B (DFOB) have been extensively studied, the role of catecholates in the dissolution of Fe mineral and rock under varying redox conditions remain limited. Moreover, despite Fe being one of the most redox-active metals, the siderophore-mediated redox transformations of solid-phase Fe and their impact on mineral dissolution are not well understood. Herein, this study systematically investigated dissolution behavior of both Fe(II) and Fe(III)-bearing minerals and rocks (Fe(II)- bearing basalt and olivine, and Fe(III)- bearing nontronite and goethite), by two structurally distinct biological siderophores, catecholate protochelin and hydroxamate DFOB, under both oxic and anoxic conditions. Batch experiments quantified Fe and transition metals (Mn, Ni, Zn, Mo) released from the tested minerals in the presence of siderophores. Throughout the dissolution experiments, siderophore concentrations and Fe-siderophore complexation in solutions were measured using UV-vis spectrometry. Fe redox changes under oxic and anoxic conditions by siderophores were determined, and mineral surface alterations following siderophore treatments were characterized through scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectroscopy (ToF-SIMS). Results revealed distinct interplays of dissolution mechanisms, including ligand-exchange promoted dissolution and reductive dissolution, along with Fe(III) reduction and Fe(II) oxidation, contributing to the Fe(II)- and Fe(III)-rich mineral weathering under varying redox conditions. Under oxic conditions, both protochelin and DFOB enhanced Fe release from Fe(II)-rich basalt and olivine more effectively than from Fe(III)-rich minerals. DFOB induced greater Fe(II)-mineral dissolution than protochelin. This difference was attributed to a higher level of Fe(II) oxidation by DFOB in contrast to protochelin, as well as the protochelin oxidation with the loss of Fe binding groups (catechols). Under anoxic conditions, both siderophores significantly reduced Fe(III) in nontronite and goethite, with protochelin demonstrating substantially stronger Fe(III) reduction capacity than DFOB. However, Fe(III) reduction negatively impacted Fe release from Fe(III)-rich minerals. Instead, Fe release from Fe(II)-rich minerals was enhanced under anoxic conditions due to the absence of Fe(II) oxidation and labile Fe(II). Variations in siderophore adsorption also contributed to dissolution differences. Beyond iron, the release of transition metals from tested minerals was influenced by elemental contents, mineral compositions, and siderophore types, revealing distinct metal- and siderophore-dependent patterns. This systematic investigation highlights the roles of siderophores in Fe redox cycling and metal mobilization, enhancing our understanding of different siderophore behaviors in siderophore-mediated microbial metal acquisition within redox-dynamic environments, with implications for bioleaching industries and applications in agriculture and climate change mitigation.