Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Bahi, L.

Publications and source records attributed to Bahi, L..

Passive shock wave/boundary layer control for transonic airfoil drag reduction

An investigation of the passive shock wave/boundary layer interaction control for reducing the drag in 12 percent thick circular arc and 14 percent thick supercritical airfoils was conducted in a 3 in. x 15.4 in. transonic wind tunnel at transonic Mach numbers. A porous surface with a cavity beneath it was positioned on the area of the airfoils, mounted on the test section bottom wall, where the shock wave occurs. The static pressure distributions over the airfoil, the wake impact pressure data for determining the profile drag, and the Schlieren photographs for porous surface airfoils are presented and compared with the results for solid surface airfoils. With the porous surface the normal shock wave for solid surface was changed to a lambda shock wave system, and the wake impact pressure data indicated an appreciable drag reduction for both airfoils with the porous surface at transonic speeds while causing little or no loss of lift. The effect of porosity and cavity size is investigated and off-design performance is discussed.

Bahi, L.↗

Investigation of passive shock wave-boundary layer control for transonic airfoil drag reduction

The passive drag control concept, consisting of a porous surface with a cavity beneath it, was investigated with a 12-percent-thick circular arc and a 14-percent-thick supercritical airfoil mounted on the test section bottom wall. The porous surface was positioned in the shock wave/boundary layer interaction region. The flow circulating through the porous surface, from the downstream to the upstream of the terminating shock wave location, produced a lambda shock wave system and a pressure decrease in the downstream region minimizing the flow separation. The wake impact pressure data show an appreciably drag reduction with the porous surface at transonic speeds. To determine the optimum size of porosity and cavity, tunnel tests were conducted with different airfoil porosities, cavities and flow Mach numbers. A higher drag reduction was obtained by the 2.5 percent porosity and the 1/4-inch deep cavity.

Nagamatsu, H. T.↗