Engineering topics

Baird, Suzanne M.

Publications and source records attributed to Baird, Suzanne M..

6 records

DOE OSTI2023

Enhanced Hanford High-Fluoride Waste Glass Property Data Development: Phase 1

This study focused on investigating the effects of fluorine concentration on simulated high-level waste glass properties to eventually establish a fluorine limit (as a single-component or multiple-component constraint) for glass formulations for high-fluoride Hanford wastes. This is a first step to provide data to understand the impacts of changing flowsheets on the mission duration and extent. A test matrix of 20 high-fluoride glasses was generated, and the chemical compositions were measured. The following properties were measured and tested against current model predictions: crystal formation after centerline canister cooling, crystallinity as a function of temperature, density, viscosity, electrical conductivity, toxic leaching characteristics using the toxicity characteristic leach profile (TCLP), product consistency using the product consistency test (PCT), and SO 3 solubility. Overall, current models failed to adequately predict most of the properties, possibly due to differences in compositional space used to generate the models and the current test matrix. Additional work is needed to more accurately assess the impacts of high-fluoride wastes on Hanford processing, including additional data collection over a broader composition region and model development for the key models of interest such as PCT and TCLP.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2023

Enhanced Hanford Low-Activity Waste Glass Property Data Development: Phase 5 and Phase 6

This report summarizes the data collected on two test matrices of low-activity waste (LAW) glass compositions intended to expand the composition-property database: Low-Activity Waste (LAW) Phase 5: Expansion of LAW Glass Composition Boundaries and LAW Phase 6: High PCT and VHT Response Glass Matrix. Both matrix glass compositions were statistically designed to expand the LAW glass composition region. The analyses performed on these glasses include chemical composition (for target compositional verification), density, viscosity, electrical conductivity, crystal fraction, container centerline cooling with crystal identification, the product consistency test (PCT) response, the vapor hydration test (VHT) response, and sulfur solubility. Because of the slightly different scope of the two matrices, not all methods were applied to both matrices. Specifically, the following measurements were taken only on the LAW Phase 5: Expansion of LAW Glass Composition Boundaries glasses: crystal fraction as a function of temperature, density (ρ), viscosity (η), and electrical conductivity (EC, e). Combined, these data contribute a significant amount, 51 glasses, to the database for high LAW loaded enhanced waste glasses. Most of these data are focused near the boundaries of acceptable PCT and VHT responses, where prediction uncertainties are most impactful.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2022

Hanford Low-Activity Waste Glass Minor Component Concentration Boundary Expansion

This study investigated the effects of increasing concentrations of minor components on simulated Hanford low-activity waste (LAW) glass properties to allow for LAW glass composition envelope expansion. A test matrix of ten glasses was generated by spiking three previously studied simulated Hanford LAW glass compositions with increasing concentrations of minor component mixes up to a total concentration of 2 wt%. In this study, the ten glasses were fabricated, and key properties were measured including crystal formation after canister centerline cooling (CCC), crystallinity as a function of temperature, density, viscosity, electrical conductivity, glass durability using the Vapor Hydration Test (VHT), product consistency using the Product Consistency Test (PCT), and sulfur solubility. The data from these tests are presented in this report.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2022

Glass Crystallization Constraints for WTP LAW Operations: Assessment of Isothermal Treatments on Crystal Formation

Much work has been done to expand the glass composition region available for operation of the Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant. This includes the development of updated glass property-composition models as well as constraints. This report supports this effort by suggesting constraints for avoiding excessive, and likely detrimental, crystallization during melter operation while processing advanced low-activity glasses. The constraints target Cassiterite and ZrO 2 -containing phases (ZCP, e.g., Baddeleyite and Zircon) that can form when melter temperatures drop below 1100 °C. These types of crystals were found to be potentially detrimental during processing as they are denser than low-activity waste glass melts; with densities of 6.95 g/cm 3 for Cassiterite and 5.68 g/cm 3 for Baddeleyite (the most prevalent ZCP). Compared to melt densities of approximately 2.65 g/cm 3 . Thus, they have the potential to form during melter idling and settle to the bottom of the melter or inside the melter. If the crystals are present in appreciable amounts, they can result in blockages of the pour-spout riser, which impacts glass pouring and melter operation. Additionally, SnO 2 and ZrO 2 are added to glass formulations to improve glass durability. Their precipitation from the melt may reduce overall glass durability. Using previously acquired results and results from testing during this effort, the following constraints (Table S.1) were determined and are recommended to reduce the risk of forming crystals of the types and concentrations that are likely detrimental to melter operation.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2021

Enhanced Hanford Low-Activity Waste Glass Property Data Development: Phase 4

This report summarizes and analyzes the data collected on a fourth test matrix of 25 low-activity waste glass compositions intended to expand the composition-property database and to validate the Vienna et al. (2020) property-composition models. The 25 low-activity waste glass compositions were statistically designed to be within the composition region of the 2020 models. The analyses performed on these glasses include chemical composition (for target compositional verification), density, viscosity, electrical conductivity, crystal fraction, canister centerline cooling with crystal identification, product consistency test response, vapor hydration test response, and sulfur solubility. This report discusses the results obtained from these tests.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2021

Glass Crystallization Constraints for WTP LAW Operations: Assessment of Isothermal Treatments on Crystal Formation

Much work has been done to expand the glass composition region available for operation of the Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant. This includes the development of updated glass property-composition models as well as constraints. This report supports this effort by suggesting constraints for avoiding excessive, and likely detrimental, crystallization during melter operation while processing advanced low-activity glass waste forms. The constraints target SnO 2 and ZrO 2 crystals that can form when melter temperatures drop below 1100 °C. These types of crystals were found to be potentially detrimental during processing as they are denser than low-activity waste glass melts. SnO 2 , density of 6.95 g/cm3, and ZrO 2 , density of 5.68 g/cm3, have the potential to form during melter idling and settle to the bottom of the less dense glass melt (approximate density 2.65 g/cm3). If the crystals are present in appreciable amounts, they can result in blockages of the pour-spout riser, which impacts glass pouring and melter operation. Using previously acquired results and results from testing during this effort, constraints were determined and are suggested as options to reduce the risk of forming crystals of the types and concentrations that are likely detrimental to melter operation.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗