Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Baity-Jesi, Marco

Publications and source records attributed to Baity-Jesi, Marco.

Differentiable modelling to unify machine learning and physical models for geosciences

Process-based modelling offers interpretability and physical consistency in many domains of geosciences but struggles to leverage large datasets efficiently. Machine-learning methods, especially deep networks, have strong predictive skills yet are unable to answer specific scientific questions. Here, in this Perspective, we explore differentiable modelling as a pathway to dissolve the perceived barrier between process-based modelling and machine learning in the geosciences and demonstrate its potential with examples from hydrological modelling. ‘Differentiable’ refers to accurately and efficiently calculating gradients with respect to model variables or parameters, enabling the discovery of high-dimensional unknown relationships. Differentiable modelling involves connecting (flexible amounts of) prior physical knowledge to neural networks, pushing the boundary of physics-informed machine learning. It offers better interpretability, generalizability, and extrapolation capabilities than purely data-driven machine learning, achieving a similar level of accuracy while requiring less training data. Additionally, the performance and efficiency of differentiable models scale well with increasing data volumes. Under data-scarce scenarios, differentiable models have outperformed machine-learning models in producing short-term dynamics and decadal-scale trends owing to the imposed physical constraints. Differentiable modelling approaches are primed to enable geoscientists to ask questions, test hypotheses, and discover unrecognized physical relationships. Future work should address computational challenges, reduce uncertainty, and verify the physical significance of outputs.

58 GEOSCIENCES↗

Superposition principle and nonlinear response in spin glasses

The extended principle of superposition has been a touchstone of spin-glass dynamics for almost 30 years. Here the Uppsala group has demonstrated its validity for the metallic spin glass, CuMn, for magnetic fields H up to 10 Oe at the reduced temperature T r = T/T g = 0.95, where T g is the spin-glass condensation temperature. For H > 10 Oe, they observe a departure from linear response which they ascribe to the development of nonlinear dynamics. The thrust of this paper is to develop a microscopic origin for this behavior by focusing on the time development of the spin-glass correlation length, ξ(t, t w ; H). Here, t is the time after H changes, and t w is the time from the quench for T > T g to the working temperature T until H changes. We connect the growth of ξ(t, t w ; H) to the barrier heights Δ(t w ) that set the dynamics. The effect of H on the magnitude of Δ (t w ) is responsible for affecting differently the two dynamical protocols associated with turning H off (TRM, or thermoremanent magnetization) or on (ZFC, or zero-field-cooled magnetization). This difference is a consequence of nonlinearity based on the effect of H on Δ (t w ). Superposition is preserved if Δ(t w ) is linear in the Hamming distance Hd (proportional to the difference between the self-overlap q EA and the overlap q[Δ(t w )]). However, superposition is violated if Δ(t w ) increases faster than linear in Hd. We have previously shown, through experiment and simulation, that the barriers Δ(t w ) do increase more rapidly than linearly with Hd through the observation that the growth of ξ(t,t w ;H) slows down as ξ(t,t w ; H) increases. In this paper, we display the difference between the zero-field-cooled ξ ZFC (t, t w ; H) and the thermoremanent magnetization ξ TRM (t, t w ; H) correlation lengths as H increases, both experimentally and through numerical simulations, corresponding to the violation of the extended principle of superposition in line with the finding of the Uppsala Group.

75 CONDENSED MATTER PHYSICS, SUPERCONDUCTIVITY AND↗

Competition between energy- and entropy-driven activation in glasses

In simplified models of glasses we clarify the existence of two different kinds of coexisting activated dynamics, with one of the two dominating over the other. One is the energy barrier hopping that is typically used to understand activation, and the other, which we call entropic activation, is driven by the scarcity of convenient directions in phase space. When entropic activation dominates, the height of the energy barriers is no longer the primary factor governing the system's slowdown. In our analysis, dominance of one mechanism over the other depends on temperature and the shape of the density of states. Herein, we also find that at low temperatures a phase transition between the two kinds of activation can occur. Our observations are used to provide a scenario that can harmonize the facilitation and thermodynamic pictures of the slowdown of glasses into a single description.

75 CONDENSED MATTER PHYSICS, SUPERCONDUCTIVITY AND↗

Effective traplike activated dynamics in a continuous landscape

In this work, we use a simple model to extend network models for activated dynamics to a continuous landscape with a well-defined notion of distance and a direct connection to many-body systems. The model consists of a tracer in a high-dimensional funnel landscape with no disorder. We find a nonequilibrium low-temperature phase with aging dynamics that is effectively equivalent to that of models with built-in disorder, such as the trap model, step model and random energy model. Finally, we compare entropy with energy-driven activation, and we remark that the former is more robust to the choice of the dynamics since it does not depend on whether one uses local or global updates.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗