Barber, Todd J. | Search NASA

NASA NTRS2019

Final Dawn Reaction Control System (RCS) propulsion system in-flight characterization

The Dawn spacecraft concluded eleven years of operations on 31-Oct-2018, upon depletion of its hydrazine supply in Ceres orbit during the second extended mission. Dawn’s Reaction Control System performed admirably during this lengthy campaign, including years of unanticipated and novel operation given Reaction Wheel Assembly failures during flight. New and modified modes of thruster operations were implemented during the mission. Pressure transducer drift was negligible, consumable limits were generally not exceeded (except for minor violations in Reaction Control System thruster cycles), and thruster performance was nominal throughout this long interplanetary journey. Tank models of hydrazine remaining mass were consistent with depletion within uncertainties, although thruster consumption-based models ended up being conservative by 15%. Unexpectedly, apparent nitrogen permeation through the hydrazine tank elastomer diaphragm allowed hydrazine in the lines below the tank to be pressurized and subsequently utilized during the final days of the mission.

Mizukami, Masashi↗

NASA NTRS2019

Final Dawn Reaction Control System (RCS) propulsion system in-flight characterization

The Dawn spacecraft concluded eleven years of operations on 31-Oct-2018, upon depletion of its hydrazine supply in Ceres orbit during the second extended mission. Dawn’s Reaction Control System performed admirably during this lengthy campaign, including years of unanticipated and novel operation given Reaction Wheel Assembly failures during flight. New and modified modes of thruster operations were implemented during the mission. Pressure transducer drift was negligible, consumable limits were generally not exceeded (except for minor violations in Reaction Control System thruster cycles), and thruster performance was nominal throughout this long interplanetary journey. Tank models of hydrazine remaining mass were consistent with depletion within uncertainties, although thruster consumption-based models ended up being conservative by 15%. Unexpectedly, apparent nitrogen permeation through the hydrazine tank elastomer diaphragm allowed hydrazine in the lines below the tank to be pressurized and subsequently utilized during the final days of the mission.

Mizukami, Masashi↗

NASA NTRS2019

Follow-on studies using the Voyager spacecraft thermal model

The 42-year-old Voyager mission, now named the Voyager Interstellar Mission (VIM) is operating long beyond its design life. In 2012, Voyager 1 crossed the heliopause into interstellar space and Voyager 2 made the same transit in November 2018. Due to declining power output from the Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generators (RTGs) the Science and Flight Operations teams continue to make difficult choices in terms of managing both the power and thermal margins to preserve critical science observations and maintain the health of the two spacecraft. A previous paper, “Creating a Voyager Thermal Model 39 Years Into the Flight Mission, Along With Model Correlation and Application” described how a thermal model of these 1977 spacecraft was developed and correlated without many design artifacts and with limited temperature telemetry. This paper describes how the thermal model has been used to establish an Allowable Flight Temperature (AFT) limit for hydrazine propellant in the propulsion subsystem to minimize the risk of freezing. Voyager 2 temperatures have already descended to this limit in the vicinity of the Roll thruster propellant lines. The Flight Operations team has investigated several ways of detecting propellant freezing based on analysis and trending of thruster performance telemetry. In addition, the Voyager thermal model is being used to predict the spacecraft response to possible changes in power state. These changes could involve turning off outboard science instruments and/or their heaters to increase power margin and hence power dissipation inside the spacecraft bus (i.e. in Bay 7, where the power regulation electronics are located). Changes might also be made to turn on or off other loads inside the bus to more effectively heat the coldest propellant lines.

Medina, Enrique↗

NASA NTRS2019

Follow-on Studies Using the Voyager Spacecraft Thermal Model: ICES Paper 2019-377

UNKNOWN

Medina, Enrique↗

NASA NTRS2019

Follow-on studies using the Voyager spacecraft thermal model

The 42-year-old Voyager mission, now named the Voyager Interstellar Mission (VIM) is operating long beyond its design life. In 2012, Voyager 1 crossed the heliopause into interstellar space and Voyager 2 made the same transit in November 2018. Due to declining power output from the Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generators (RTGs) the Science and Flight Operations teams continue to make difficult choices in terms of managing both the power and thermal margins to preserve critical science observations and maintain the health of the two spacecraft. A previous paper, “Creating a Voyager Thermal Model 39 Years Into the Flight Mission, Along With Model Correlation and Application” described how a thermal model of these 1977 spacecraft was developed and correlated without many design artifacts and with limited temperature telemetry. This paper describes how the thermal model has been used to establish an Allowable Flight Temperature (AFT) limit for hydrazine propellant in the propulsion subsystem to minimize the risk of freezing. Voyager 2 temperatures have already descended to this limit in the vicinity of the Roll thruster propellant lines. The Flight Operations team has investigated several ways of detecting propellant freezing based on analysis and trending of thruster performance telemetry. In addition, the Voyager thermal model is being used to predict the spacecraft response to possible changes in power state. These changes could involve turning off outboard science instruments and/or their heaters to increase power margin and hence power dissipation inside the spacecraft bus (i.e. in Bay 7, where the power regulation electronics are located). Changes might also be made to turn on or off other loads inside the bus to more effectively heat the coldest propellant lines. Many of these changes have been or will be tested first on Voyager 1 which has more power margin and does not have the power matrix commanding issues experienced on Voyager 2. Ultimately this assessment may assist the Voyager project in making decisions on the order in which science instruments are permanently turned off.

Medina, Enrique↗

NASA NTRS2018

Final Cassini Propulsion System In-Flight Characterization

Cassini plunged into Saturn’s atmosphere on September 15, 2017, the culmination of two decades of incredible planetary exploration. The Cassini propulsion system performed spectacularly during this lengthy mission, executing 360 propulsive maneuvers successfully. R-4D performance was impeccable during 183 main-engine burns, ranging from 1.3 seconds to 96 minutes in duration. Pressure transducer drift was negligible, latch valve back-pressure relief was nominal, and pressurization system performance was flawless, except for hard-seat prime regulator leakage early in the mission. System health checks based on helium mass calculations (helium mass budgets) demonstrated no discernible helium pressurant or propellant leakage. Premature degradation of prime MR-103H RCS thrusters was noted, but back-up RCS thrusters completed the mission successfully. Final usable propellant margins were about 25% for hydrazine and less than 1% for bipropellant.

Barber, Todd J.↗

NASA NTRS2015

Ensuring Cassini's End-of-Mission Propellant Margins

The Cassini spacecraft is in its final years. On September 15, 2017, Cassini will plunge deep into Saturn's atmosphere never to reemerge; thus concluding its second extended mission and 13 years in orbit around the ringed planet. As of October 2014, the spacecraft is four years in to its seven-year, second extended mission, the Cassini Solstice Mission (CSM). With three years left and only 2.5% of its loaded bipropellant and 37% of its loaded monopropellant remaining, the Cassini project actively manages the predicted end-of-mission propellant margins to maintain a high confidence in the spacecraft's ability to complete the CSM as designed.

Sturm, Erick J., II↗

NASA NTRS2013

Mars Science Laboratory Cruise Propulsion Maneuvering Operations

Mars Science Laboratory "Curiosity" is NASA's most recent mission to Mars, launched in November 2011, and landed in August 2012. It is a subcompact car-sized nuclear powered rover designed for a long duration mission, with an extensive suite of science instruments. Entry, descent and landing used a unique "skycrane" concept. This report describes the propulsive maneuvering operations during cruise from Earth to Mars, to control attitudes and to target the vehicle for entry. The propulsion subsystem, mission operations, and flight performance are discussed. All trajectory control maneuvers were well within accuracy requirements, and all turns and spin corrections were nominal.

Baker, Raymond S.↗

NASA NTRS2004

In-flight propulsion system characterization for both Mars Exploration Rover Spacecraft

Two Mars Exploration Rover spacecraft were dispensed to red planet in 2003, culminating in a phenomenally successful prime science mission. Twin cruise stage propulsion systems were developed in record time, largely through heritage with Mars Pathfinder. As expected, consumable usage was minimal during the short seven-month cruise for both spacecraft. Propellant usage models based on pressure and temperature agreed with throughput models with in a few percent. Trajectory correction maneuver performance was nominal, allowing the cancellation of near-Mars maneuvers. Spin thruster delivered impulse was 10-12% high vs. ground based models for the intial spin-down maneuvers, while turn performance was XX-XX% high/low vs. expectations. No clear indications for pressure transducer drift were noted during the brief MER missions.

maneuvers↗

NASA NTRS1997

(abstract) Final Galileo Propulsion System In-Flight Characterization (Extended Abstract)

The Galileo Retropropulsion Module (RPM) has performed excellently during nearly seven years of Galileo mission operations. The RPM was provided by the Federal Republic of Germany to NASA to provide directed impulse to the Galileo spacecraft during all phases of the Galileo mission following Inertial Upper Stage (IUS) jettison. This paper documents the in-flight performance of the Galileo propulsion system since July 1993.

Galileo Galileo Retropropulsion Module propellants↗