Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Bauer, A. B.

Publications and source records attributed to Bauer, A. B..

Jet noise suppression by porous plug nozzles

Jet noise suppression data presented earlier by Maestrello for porous plug nozzles were supplemented by the testing of a family of nozzles having an equivalent throat diameter of 11.77 cm. Two circular reference nozzles and eight plug nozzles having radius ratios of either 0.53 or 0.80 were tested at total pressure ratios of 1.60 to 4.00. Data were taken both with and without a forward motion or coannular flow jet, and some tests were made with a heated jet. Jet thrust was measured. The data were analyzed to show the effects of suppressor geometry on nozzle propulsive efficiency and jet noise. Aerodynamic testing of the nozzles was carried out in order to study the physical features that lead to the noise suppression. The aerodynamic flow phenomena were examined by the use of high speed shadowgraph cinematography, still shadowgraphs, extensive static pressure probe measurements, and two component laser Doppler velocimeter studies. The different measurement techniques correlated well with each other and demonstrated that the porous plug changes the shock cell structure of a standard nozzle into a series of smaller, periodic cell structures without strong shock waves. These structures become smaller in dimension and have reduced pressure variations as either the plug diameter or the porosity is increased, changes that also reduce the jet noise and decrease thrust efficiency.

Bauer, A. B.↗

Jet noise suppression by porous plug nozzles

Jet noise suppression data presented earlier by Maestrello for porous plug nozzles have been supplemented by the testing of a family of nozzles having an equivalent throat diameter of 11.77 cm. Two circular reference nozzles and eight plug nozzles having radius ratios of either 0.53 or 0.80 were tested at total pressure ratios of 1.60 to 4.00. Data were taken both with and without a forward motion of coannular flow jet, and some tests were made with a heated jet. Jet thrust was measured. The data were analyzed to show the effects of suppressor geometry on nozzle propulsive efficiency and jet noise. Jet noise reductions in overall sound pressure level of up to 15 dB were obtained with a 3.5 percent reduction in thrust, but reductions of 10 dB were obtained at thrust reductions on the order of 0.3 percent. The noise reductions for subsonic pressure ratios were much less than those for supersonic pressure ratios.

Bauer, A. B.↗

Lateral noise-attenuation results from flyovers of three transport aircraft

Lateral noise-attenuation data have been compiled in a one-third-octave-band analysis from an available set of flyover tests using DC-8, DC-9, and DC-10 aircraft. For an intermediate frequency range of 400 through 2000 Hertz the lateral noise has been approximately separated into its two components - the excess ground attenuation and the aircraft shielding attenuation. Both attenuation factors varied from a maximum at small elevation angles to zero at an elevation angle of approximately 40 degrees. The lateral attenuation in this range generally did not vary with frequency. For frequencies of 80 Hertz and lower, negative lateral attenuation values were obtained. For high frequencies, the data were not complete enough to generate definitive lateral attenuation curves.

Mashita, E. M.↗

Airframe noise of the DC-9-31

Airframe noise measurements are reported for the DC-9-31 aircraft flown at several speeds and with a number of flap, landing gear, and slat extension configurations. The data are corrected for wind effects, atmospheric attenuation, and spherical divergence, and are normalized to a 1 meter acoustic range. The sound pressure levels are found to vary approximately as the fifth power of flight velocity. Both lift and drag dipoles exist as a significant part of the airframe noise. The sideline data imply that a significant side-force dipole exists only for the flap- and gear-down configurations; for others, the data imply the existence of only the lift and drag dipoles. The data are compared with airframe noise predictions using the drag element and the data analysis methods. Although some of the predictions are good, further work is needed to refine the methods, particularly for the flap- and gear-down configurations.

Bauer, A. B.↗

Airframe noise of the DC-9

Airframe noise measurements are reported for the DC-9-31 aircraft flown at several speeds and with a number of flap, landing gear, and slat extension configurations. The data are corrected for atmospheric attenuation and spherical divergence, and are presented for an overhead position normalized to a 1-meter height. The sound pressure levels are found to vary approximately as the fifth power of flight velocity. Both lift and drag dipoles exist as a significant part of the airframe noise. The data are compared with airframe noise predictions using the drag element and the data analysis methods. Although some of the predictions are very good, further work is needed to refine these methods, particularly for the gear-down and flaps-down configurations.

Bauer, A. B.↗