Structural and Theoretical Assessment of Covalency in a Pu(III) Borohydride Complex
Not Available
Engineering topics
Publications and source records attributed to Bhowmick, Rina.
Not Available
Not Available
Copper corroles are known for their unique multiconfigurational electronic structures in the ground state, which arise from the transfer of electrons from the π orbitals of the corrole to the d-orbital of copper. While density functional theory (DFT) provides reasonably good molecular geometries, the determination of the ground spin state and the associated energetics is heavily influenced by functional choice, particularly the percentage of the Hartree–Fock exchange. Using extended multireference perturbation theory methods (XMS-CASPT2), the functional choice can be assessed. The molecular geometries and electronic structures of both the unsubstituted and the meso-triphenyl copper corroles were investigated. A minimal active space was employed for structural characterization, while larger active spaces are required to examine the electronic structure. The XMS-CASPT2 investigations conclusively identify the ground electronic state as a multiconfigurational singlet (S o ) with three dominant electronic configurations in its lowest energy and characteristic saddled structure. In contrast, the planar geometry corresponds to the triplet state (T o ), which is approximately 5 kcal/mol higher in energy compared to the S o state for both the bare and substituted copper corroles. Notably, the planarity of the T o geometry is reduced in the substituted corrole compared with that in the unsubstituted one. By analyzing the potential energy surface (PES) between the S o and T o geometries using XMS-CASPT2, the multiconfigurational electronic structure is shown to transition toward a single electron configuration as the saddling angle decreases (i.e., as one approaches the planar geometry). Despite the ability of the functionals to reproduce the minimum energy structures, only the TPSSh-D 3 PES is reasonably close to the XMS-CASPT2 surface. Significant deviations along the PES are observed with other functionals.
Abstract Qualitative differences in the reactivity of trivalent lanthanide and actinide complexes have long been attributed to differences in covalent metal‐ligand bonding, but there are few examples where thermodynamic aspects of this relationship have been quantified, especially with U 3+ and in the absence of competing variables. Here we report a series of dimeric phosphinodiboranate complexes with trivalent f ‐metals that show how shorter‐than‐expected U−B distances indicative of increased covalency give rise to measurable differences in solution deoligomerization reactivity when compared to isostructural complexes with similarly sized lanthanides. These results, which are in excellent agreement with supporting DFT and QTAIM calculations, afford rare experimental evidence concerning the measured effect of variations in metal‐ligand covalency on the reactivity of trivalent uranium and lanthanide complexes.
Abstract Qualitative differences in the reactivity of trivalent lanthanide and actinide complexes have long been attributed to differences in covalent metal‐ligand bonding, but there are few examples where thermodynamic aspects of this relationship have been quantified, especially with U 3+ and in the absence of competing variables. Here we report a series of dimeric phosphinodiboranate complexes with trivalent f ‐metals that show how shorter‐than‐expected U−B distances indicative of increased covalency give rise to measurable differences in solution deoligomerization reactivity when compared to isostructural complexes with similarly sized lanthanides. These results, which are in excellent agreement with supporting DFT and QTAIM calculations, afford rare experimental evidence concerning the measured effect of variations in metal‐ligand covalency on the reactivity of trivalent uranium and lanthanide complexes.
Reaction of [UI 2 (HMPA) 4 ]I with potassium anthracenide gives the unprecedented arenide-sandwich complex U(η 6 -C 14 H 10 )(η 4 -C 14 H 10 )(HMPA) 2 . CASSCF calculations indicate the U–C bonding to solely consist of π-interactions.
Addition of [UI 2 (THF) 3 (μ-OMe)] 2 ·THF (2·THF) to THF solutions containing 6 equiv. of K[C 14 H 10 ] generates the heteroleptic dimeric complexes [K(18-crown-6)(THF) 2 ] 2 [U(η 6 -C 14 H 10 )(η 4 -C 14 H 10 )(μ-OMe)] 2 ·4THF (1 18C6 ·4THF) and {[K(THF) 3 ][U(η 6 -C 14 H 10 )(η 4 -C 14 H 10 )(μ-OMe)]} 2 (1 THF ) upon crystallization of the products in THF in the presence or absence of 18-crown-6, respectively. Both 1 18C6 ·4THF and 1 THF are thermally stable in the solid-state at room temperature; however, after crystallization, they become insoluble in THF or DME solutions and instead gradually decompose upon standing. X-ray diffraction analysis reveals 1 18C6 ·4THF and 1 THF to be structurally similar, possessing uranium centres sandwiched between bent anthracenide ligands of mixed tetrahapto and hexahapto ligation modes. Yet, the two complexes are distinguished by the close contact potassium-arenide ion pairing that is seen in 1 THF but absent in 1 18C6 ·4THF, which is observed to have a significant effect on the electronic characteristics of the two complexes. Structural analysis, SQUID magnetometry data, XANES spectral characterization, and computational analyses are generally consistent with U(IV) formal assignments for the metal centres in both 1 18C6 ·4THF and 1 THF , though noticeable differences are detected between the two species. For instance, the effective magnetic moment of 1 THF (3.74 μ B ) is significantly lower than that of 1 18C6 ·4THF (4.40 μ B ) at 300 K. Furthermore, the XANES data shows the U L III -edge absorption energy for 1 THF to be 0.9 eV higher than that of 1 18C6 ·4THF, suggestive of more oxidized metal centres in the former. Of note, CASSCF calculations on the model complex {[U(η 6 -C 14 H 10 )(η 4 -C 14 H 10 )(μ-OMe)] 2 } 2– (1*) shows highly polarized uranium–arenide interactions defined by π-type bonds where the metal contributions are primarily comprised by the 6d-orbitals (7.3 ± 0.6%) with minor participation from the 5f-orbitals (1.5 ± 0.5%). These unique complexes provide new insights into actinide–arenide bonding interactions and show the sensitivity of the electronic structures of the uranium atoms to coordination sphere effects.