Engineering topics

Bortolussi, M. R.

Publications and source records attributed to Bortolussi, M. R..

5 records

NASA NTRS1985

Measuring pilot workload in a motion base trainer - A comparison of four techniques

Various techniques have been developed to predict and measure pilot workload. This simulation was conducted in order to compare four widely used methods: A visual two- and four-choice reaction time task, time production, retrospective multi-dimensional subjective ratings and in-flight verbal workload estimates. Two scenarios with different levels of difficulty determined by preliminary research were designed to test these techniques. The insertion of the secondary tasks did not significantly affect flight performance. All four techniques were able to distinguish among levels of scenario complexity. In addition, the three secondary tasks and workload ratings obtained in-flight were generally able to distinguish among levels of difficulty for different segments within the scenarios.

Bortolussi, M. R.↗

NASA NTRS1984

Pilot errors as a source of workload

A pilot opinion survey was conducted to develop a database for creating simulation scenarios that impose predetermined levels of pilot workload. Twelve pilots estimated the effect of 163 events and activities (which they had encountered during their previous flying experiences) on performance, effort, workload, and stress. The events, described in the context of flight scenario segments, included control, navigation and communications activities, aircraft and system failures, and pilot errors. In general, workload, stress, and effort ratings were significantly correlated with each other but not with performance ratings; however, some different response patterns were found as a function of flight segment (e.g., workload, stress, and performance, but not effort, ratings varied with flight phase) and type of event. Errors were rated as a significant source of change for workload, stress, and performance, suggesting that errors could be conceptualized as a cause of workload rather than as a symptom.

Hart, S. G.↗

NASA NTRS1984

Measuring Pilot Workload in a Moving-base Simulator. Part 2: Building Levels of Workload

Pilot behavior in flight simulators often use a secondary task as an index of workload. His routine to regard flying as the primary task and some less complex task as the secondary task. While this assumption is quite reasonable for most secondary tasks used to study mental workload in aircraft, the treatment of flying a simulator through some carefully crafted flight scenario as a unitary task is less justified. The present research acknowledges that total mental workload depends upon the specific nature of the sub-tasks that a pilot must complete as a first approximation, flight tasks were divided into three levels of complexity. The simplest level (called the Base Level) requires elementary maneuvers that do not utilize all the degrees of freedom of which an aircraft, or a moving-base simulator; is capable. The second level (called the Paired Level) requires the pilot to simultaneously execute two Base Level tasks. The third level (called the Complex Level) imposes three simultaneous constraints upon the pilot.

Kantowitz, B. H.↗

NASA NTRS1983

Measuring pilot workload in a moving-base simulator. I Asynchronous secondary choice-reaction task

The de facto method for measuring airplane pilot workload is based upon subjective ratings. While researchers agree that such subjective data should be bolstered by using objective behavioral measures, results to date have been mixed. No clear objective technique has surfaced as the metric of choice. It is believed that this difficulty is in part due to neglect of theoretical work in psychology that predicts some of the difficulties that are inherent in a futile search for 'the one and only' best secondary task to measure workload. An initial study that used both subjective ratings and an asynchronous choice-reaction secondary task was conducted to determine if such a secondary task could indeed meet the methodological constraints imposed by current theories of attention. Two variants of a flight scenario were combined with two levels of the secondary task. Appropriate single-task control conditions were also included. Results give grounds for cautious optimism but indicate that future research should use synchronous secondary tasks where possible.

Kantowitz, B. H.↗

NASA NTRS1982

The reliability and validity of flight task workload ratings

Twelve instrument-rated general aviation pilots each flew two scenarios in a motion-base simulator. During each flight, the pilots verbally estimated their workload every three minutes. Following each flight, they again estimated workload for each flight segment and also rated their overall workload, perceived performance, and 13 specific factors on a bipolar scale. The results indicate that time (a priori, inflight, or postflight) of eliciting ratings, period to be covered by the ratings (a specific moment in time or a longer period), type of rating scale, and rating method (verbal, written, or other) may be important variables. Overall workload ratings appear to be predicted by different specific scales depending upon the situation, with activity level the best predictor. Perceived performance seems to bear little relationship to observer-rated performance when pilots rate their overall performance and an observer rates specific behaviors. Perceived workload and performance also seem unrelated.

Childress, M. E.↗