Bott, Archie F. A. | Search NASA

DOE OSTI2023

Proton imaging of high-energy-density laboratory plasmas

Proton imaging has become a key diagnostic for measuring electromagnetic fields in high-energy-density (HED) laboratory plasmas. Compared to other techniques for diagnosing fields, proton imaging is a measurement that can simultaneously offer high spatial and temporal resolution and the ability to distinguish between electric and magnetic fields without the protons perturbing the plasma of interest. Consequently, proton imaging has been used in a wide range of HED experiments, from inertial-confinement fusion to laboratory astrophysics. An overview is provided on the state of the art of proton imaging, including a discussion of experimental considerations like proton sources and detectors, the theory of proton-imaging analysis, and a survey of experimental results demonstrating the breadth of applications. As a result, topics at the frontiers of proton-imaging development are also described, along with an outlook on the future of the field.

70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗

DOE OSTI2023

Quantitative proton radiography and shadowgraphy for arbitrary intensities

Charged-particle radiography and shadowgraphy data can be directly inverted to obtain a line-integrated transverse Lorentz force or a line-integrated transverse refractive index gradient if intensity modulations due to scattering and absorption are negligible, and angular deflections are small. We develop a new direct-inversion algorithm based on plasma physics and compare it to a new Monge–Ampère code and an existing power diagram code. The measured or source intensity is represented by electrons subject to drag, and the other intensity by fixed ions. The decrease in kinetic plus electrostatic energy determines convergence. The displacement of the electrons from their initial to their equilibrium positions determines the line-integrated force or refractive index gradient. We have implemented two approaches: PIC (particle in cell) and Lagrangian fluid, in 1-D and 2-D. The PIC code works for arbitrary intensities, can work efficiently in parallel, and can make use of existing codes. The Lagrangian code requires less memory and is faster than the PIC code without massively parallel processing, but fails in 2-D for large intensity modulations. The Monge–Ampère code is by far the fastest in 2-D, without massively parallel processing, but fails for intensities with large voids, high contrast ratios and large deflections across the boundaries, and could not obtain the degree of convergence possible with the PIC code. As a result, the power diagram code was by far the slowest and most memory intensive, and failed for large peaks in the measured intensity.

72 PHYSICS OF ELEMENTARY PARTICLES AND FIELDS↗