Search NASASearch

Engineering topics

Branchflower, G. A.

Publications and source records attributed to Branchflower, G. A..

Satellite technology

An exposure to satellite design and fabrication techniques used in unmanned satellite programs is provided. Spacecraft configurations of the earth resources technology satellite (ERTS) and the improved ITOS operational satellite, which are typical of the construction and layout techniques presently in use, are discussed. Support and service subsystems are described taking the ERTS subsystems as representative. The subsystems explained comprise: power, attitude control, orbit adjustment, wideband telemetry, tracking-telemetry-command, auxiliary processing, electrical integration, and spaceborne recording devices. A number of photographs, renditions and diagrams illustrates the text.

Branchflower, G. A.

Present and future NASA earth resources related satellite programs

Ongoing and presently contemplated earth resources related space programs are discussed, and the evolution of present programs is presented. Nimbus, ERTS (earth resources technology satellite), Skylab, and GEOS C (geodetic earth-orbiting satellite C) are the ongoing programs described. Future projects explained comprise ERS (earth resources survey operational satellite), Nimbus G, EOS (earth observatory satellite), SEASAT (sea satellite), and shuttle sortie. The objectives and instrument payloads for each of the missions are detailed. A number of high-altitude color satellite photographs supplements the treatment.

Branchflower, G. A.

Spacecraft systems design trade-offs for the Earth Resources Technology Satellite.

The Earth Resources Technology Satellite Program's use of flight proven hardware in the design of a satellite for earth sensor payload support and data handling is discussed. The use of an existing satellite as the building block around which additional support systems such as the orbit adjust system, the redundant wideband telemetry systems, the second regulated power system, and the quad redundant command system is analyzed. System performance seen in orbit vs design objectives are discussed to point up the success of the design approach chosen. Also discussed are the schedule and cost benefits derived from the use of previously developed hardware with additional subsystems as required to meet program requirements.

Branchflower, G. A.