Brandys, Marek | Search NASA

DOE OSTI2024

Off-line Tests of the DM1200 Thermal Catalytic Oxidation (TCO) Unit (Final Report)

The River Protection Project-Waste Treatment Plant (RPP-WTP) Low-Activity Waste (LAW) and High-Level Waste (HLW) feed streams are listed for a variety of hazardous organic compounds. The permitting basis for the WTP systems may necessitate the demonstration of minimum Destruction/Removal Efficiencies (DREs) of such species from any released emissions of up to 99.99%. Results from a previous study on the fate of hazardous organics in the melter itself indicated, not only that DREs for selected test compounds approached 99.99% only at extreme melter conditions, but also that organic compounds not originally present in the feed were actually produced in the melter, In order to ensure that the required DREs for hazardous organics are met, Thermal Catalytic Oxidation (TCO) units were therefore added to both the HLW and LAW off-gas treatment systems, The extent to which these species can be destroyed or removed in the TCO units is therefore an important issue in the design and permitting of the LAW and HLW off-gas treatment systems. A further consideration is that it would be desirable, if possible, to be able to achieve all of the required DRE across the TCO alone. If that is not the case, the DRE would be distributed across several unit operations, which may then become subject to additional operational constraints that may reduce process flexibility. Compliance with the DRE requirements on the basis of the TCO unit alone is also an approach that lends itself to periodic confirmation during operations, since the TCO is located at the back-end of the off-gas treatment system where radioactivity levels are lowest.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2022

Iodine Removal in the DFLAW Flow-Sheet

In support of the WTP project, off-gas system and regulatory testing has been conducted previously on the DM1200 pilot melter equipped with a prototypical off-gas system installed at The Catholic University of America’s Vitreous State Laboratory (VSL). During the regulatory tests, an AC-S test bed filled with Kombisorb BAT 37 was included in the prototypical off-gas system and evaluated for response to HLW and LAW exhaust streams. Offline testing and small-scale testing of that media were also conducted. Testing demonstrated that a temperature rise occurred in the activated carbon media when water vapor was first introduced to virgin Kombisorb BAT 37, in response to high nitrogen oxide concentrations, and in response to the presence of organic compounds. Conditioning of the test bed by gradually increasing the NOx concentration prior to the introduction of organics was found to be an important operational strategy for preventing larger temperature excursions. However, no mercury was present in the exhaust stream during DM1200 testing and therefore comparable test data for mercury removal efficiency or temperature response of the carbon media in the presence of mercury were not collected in the DM1200 tests. In view of the need for data on mercury removal performance, BNI contracted with Atkins and the VSL to install and operate a suitable test system at VSL to collect the required data. That testing was designed to assess the performance of Kombisorb BAT-37 and the guard bed material, Sofnolime RG, for simulated melter exhaust streams that contain the highest concentrations of mercury, nitrogen oxides, acid gases, and organic compounds expected in WTP LAW melter exhaust. During shakedown testing with the new system, however, it became evident that a number of issues with Sofnolime RG as the guard bed material would render it unsuitable for this application. BNI subsequently determined that the guard bed was redundant for removal of acid gases since they could be adequately removed by the SBS and WESP. However, since the guard bed material was also credited with significant iodine removal , there was a need for a replacement material that would adequately perform that role. BNI identified several candidate media but performance data in gas compositions that are representative of the WTP LAW off-gas were not available. Accordingly, there was a need to test and evaluate the performance of these candidate media prior to performing the originally-planned tests. To that end, small scale tests were conducted to assess the performance of various adsorbents in simulated melter exhaust streams that contain mercury, iodine, nitrogen oxides, acid gases, and acetonitrile, which are expected to be present in WTP LAW melter exhaust.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2022

FY2021 Rotating Bed Reactor for Iodine Removal from ETF Feed to Support DFLAW Start-Up

In FY20, Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC (WRPS) began a program of work to evaluate potential technologies for removal of iodine from the ETF feed. Work at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) focused on ion exchange media and conventional column based deployment while Atkins and VSL focused on ion exchange media in a Rotating Bed Reactor (RBR) system. In the RBR system, the ion exchange media is loaded into a packed bed, which is rotated in the liquid to be treated. The work described in this report builds on the results from FY20 work, in particular, with regard to improving iodate removal, extending the data set to support process modeling, further comparison of RBR versus column performance, and RBR scale-up testing.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2021

Acetonitrile Destruction and Fate of Organics in the Reverse Osmosis System at the ETF

The Hanford Site Effluent Treatment Facility (ETF) currently treats aqueous waste streams that include condensates from the 242-A evaporator, leachate from the Environmental Restoration Disposal Facility (ERDF), as well as laboratory wastes and, in the future, will treat liquid effluents from the Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) and Integrated Disposal Facility (IDF) leachate. Liquid effluents from the WTP will have significant concentrations of acetonitrile. Acetonitrile is formed by reaction of nitrates and sugar in the WTP low activity waste (LAW) melters and is prevalent in the submerged bed scrubber (SBS) and wet electrostatic precipitator (WESP) liquid effluents from WTP off-gas treatment. When these liquids are concentrated in the WTP Effluent Management Facility (EMF) evaporator in the direct feed low activity waste (DFLAW) flow-sheet, testing has shown that the majority of the acetonitrile partitions to the evaporator condensate. Since the evaporator condensate is directed to the ETF, this creates a potential issue with the ETF waste acceptance criteria. Consequently, there is a need to validate flow-sheet assumptions on the fate of acetonitrile and other organics within the ETF. The present plan includes the addition of a steam stripper to the ETF to remove acetonitrile. There is, therefore, also a need to determine a suitable method to destroy acetonitrile in the overhead condensate stream from the new steam stripper. Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC (WRPS) previously contracted with Atkins and the Vitreous State Laboratory (VSL) of The Catholic University of America (CUA) to perform development and testing work to evaluate potential methods for destruction of acetonitrile in WTP secondary liquid effluents. Based on the results of that work, WRPS requested that follow-on testing be conducted to further evaluate acetonitrile destruction in the steam stripper condensate using ultraviolet oxidation (UV/OX) with persulfate. WRPS also requested testing to assess the rejection rate of organics in the reverse osmosis (RO) system installed in the ETF. This report presents the results from testing to address those needs.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2020

Acetonitrile Destruction in ETF Feed Solutions by UV/OX and Persulfate (Final Report)

The Hanford Site Effluent Treatment Facility (ETF) currently treats aqueous waste streams that include condensates from the 242-A evaporator, leachate from the Environmental Restoration Disposal Facility (ERDF), as well as laboratory wastes and, in the future, will treat liquid effluents from the Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) and Integrated Disposal Facility (IDF) leachate. Liquid effluents from the WTP will have significant concentrations of acetonitrile. Acetonitrile is formed by reaction of nitrates and sugar in the WTP low activity waste (LAW) melters and is prevalent in the submerged bed scrubber (SBS) and wet electrostatic precipitator (WESP) liquid effluents from WTP off-gas treatment. When these liquids are concentrated in the WTP Effluent Management Facility (EMF) evaporator in the direct feed low activity waste (DFLAW) flow-sheet, testing has shown that the majority of the acetonitrile partitions to the evaporator condensate. Since the evaporator condensate is directed to the ETF, this creates a potential issue with the ETF waste acceptance criteria and, specifically, the ETF Delisting Modification treatability envelope limits. Consequently, there is a need to assess possible mitigation approaches, one of which involves identification and assessment of potential treatment processes to destroy the acetonitrile, which is the subject of the present report.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2020

FY2020 Rotating Bed Reactor for Iodine Removal from WTP Melter Effluent to Support DFLAW Start-Up

In Performance Assessment (PA) of the Hanford Integrated Disposal Facility (IDF), 129 I is a significant contributor to the risk. The 2017 IDF PA accounted for 0.22% of the total 129 I inventory in Hanford tank waste as residing in the solidified liquid waste from the Effluent Treatment Facility (ETF). However, recent estimates suggest that higher percentages of the iodine processed at the Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) may be present in the liquid waste routed to the Liquid Effluent Retention Facility (LERF) for eventual treatment at the ETF. In addition, a recent integrated melter test performed at the Vitreous State Laboratory (VSL) at The Catholic University of America (CUA) showed the possibility that a significant fraction (>50%) of the total iodine in the melter feed could be present in the aqueous waste stream destined for the ETF. This stream represents a combination of the Effluent Management Facility (EMF) evaporator overhead condensate and the liquid waste from the WTP off-gas caustic scrubber. Higher levels of 129 I in this stream could affect the LERF and ETF Hazard Categorizations as well as the acceptability of the solidified ETF liquid secondary waste brine for disposal at the IDF. Accordingly, there is a need to investigate and develop potential methods and processes to mitigate this risk. Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC (WRPS) tasked Atkins and VSL to perform development and testing work to evaluate potential methods for removal of iodine species from the waste stream routed to the LERF. In particular, the testing investigated the use of an Atkins-SpinIonic™ Rotating Bed Reactor (RBR) system as a potential alternative to conventional column-based ion exchange or absorption processes. The present report provides results obtained from testing with an RBR system for the removal of iodine from simulants of the projected WTP waste stream that discharges to the LERF.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2020

Testing of UV Oxidation Process for Acetonitrile Destruction

The Hanford Site Effluent Treatment Facility (ETF) currently treats aqueous waste streams that include condensates from the 242-A evaporator, leachate from the Environmental Restoration Disposal Facility (ERDF), as well as laboratory wastes and, in the future, will treat liquid effluents from the Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) and Integrated Disposal Facility (IDF) leachate. Liquid effluents from the WTP will have significant concentrations of acetonitrile. Acetonitrile is formed by reaction of nitrates and sugar in the WTP low activity waste (LAW) melters and is prevalent in the submerged bed scrubber (SBS) and wet electrostatic precipitator (WESP) liquid effluents from WTP off-gas treatment. When these liquids are concentrated in the WTP Effluent Management Facility (EMF) evaporator in the direct feed low activity waste (DFLAW) flow-sheet, testing has shown that the majority of the acetonitrile partitions to the evaporator condensate. Since the evaporator condensate is directed to the ETF, this creates a potential issue with the ETF waste acceptance criteria and, specifically, the ETF Delisting Modification treatability envelope limits. Consequently, there is a need to assess possible mitigation approaches, one of which involves identification and assessment of potential treatment processes to destroy the acetonitrile, which is the subject of the present report.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗