Search NASASearch

Engineering topics

Brenda S Henderson

Publications and source records attributed to Brenda S Henderson.

A History of Jet Noise Research at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration

This paper reviews jet noise research conducted at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) from the early 1950s to the present day. Research conducted by NASA’s predecessor, the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA), and early years of NASA focused on turbojet noise, where a common approach for reducing jet noise was to limit the jet exit velocity to speeds that provided acceptable noise levels. Suppressors tested during this time resulted in thrust losses that were too severe to be implemented. With the introduction of turbofan engines in the 1960s, NASA shifted research to programs for both subsonic and supersonic aircraft applications with specific noise reduction goals. Subsonic research focused on increasing the bypass ratio of the engine to reduce the jet exit velocity of the core exhaust and adding mixers to the dual exhaust streams. Advances in computational methods improved aerodynamic designs and jet noise prediction tools. Supersonic applications proved to be more troublesome as programs aimed at large commercial transports required higher specific thrust engines. Changing the engine cycle to reduce jet noise was not compatible with mission range and speed requirements. Research for supersonic commercial aircraft remains an area of interest today at NASA.

Jet Noise

Noise Measurements from Ground Tests of the Moog SureFly Vehicle

Noise measurements from a ground test of a small vertical lift research vehicle are presented. The proof-of-concept all-electric vehicle called “SureFly” was developed by Moog, Inc. A cooperative effort between NASA and Moog, Inc. has led to one of the first acoustic test datasets from an Urban Air Mobility (UAM) vehicle being developed for passenger and cargo. Results show propeller and possibly motor tones are important for the overall noise levels. The vehicle has four support arms each with a pair of contra-rotating propellers. Noise measurements show higher noise levels from the lower propellers, likely due to inflow distortion from the arms and top propellers. Possible motor noise was identified by calculating harmonics of the line frequency and comparing to the tones in the narrowband acoustic spectra and phased microphone array data. The acoustic far field was found to be about 100 ft away from the vehicle, but additional microphones are needed to provide a better assessment. Results show the presence of modulation for some test conditions. The work reported here is only for ground tests.

Acoustics

DGEN Aeropropulsion Research Turbofan Core/Combustor-Noise Measurements-Experiment and Modal Structure at Core-Nozzle Exit

Data from a recent core/combustor-noise source-diagnostic test utilizing a small turbo-fan engine are analyzed. The campaign continued the exploration begun in a baseline test, but with more extensive acoustic instrumentation. Both tests were aimed at developing a better understanding of propulsion-noise sources and their impact on the farfield noise signature, in order to enable improved turbofan noise-prediction methods and noise-mitigation techniques. Simultaneous high-data-rate acoustic measurements (93 channels in total) were obtained using a circumferential sensor array at the core-nozzle exit in conjunction with sideline and farfield microphone arrays for several relevant engine operational points. Measurements were repeated for different circumferential and sideline array configurations, as well as for redundancy. The unsteady pressure field at the core-nozzle exit is documented in detail. Previous work suggested that the±1azimuthal duct mode could be cut-on at this location, which would have implications for combustor-noise modeling and prediction. The modal decomposition of the combustor noise at the core-nozzle exit verifies this observation. Select farfield sound-pressure-level spectra are also presented.

Aeroacoustics

DGEN Aeropropulsion Research Turbofan Source-Diagnostic Test: Experimental Setup and Acoustic-Data Structure

The experimental setup of, and available data from a recent core/combustor-noise source-diagnostic test utilizing a small turbofan engine are described. The 2019 test campaign continued the investigation of the core/combustor-noise component of aircraft-propulsor noise begun in an earlier baseline test, but with a more extensive acoustic-instrumentation layout. The purpose of both tests was to better understand the impact on civilian-transport airport-community noise from turbofan-combustor sources and thereby to lay the foundation for improved noise-prediction methods and noise-mitigation techniques. Simultaneous high-data-rate acoustic measurements were obtained using a circumferential sensor array at the core nozzle exit in conjunction with sideline and farfield microphone arrays. The test matrix contained engine operational points from engine idle to maximum power and was repeated for different circumferential and sideline array configurations, as well as for redundancy. The extensive data set (up to 93 channels of data and various configurations) allows the application of advanced source-separation and phased-array methods to elucidate not only the core-noise structure, but also the propagation characteristics of other propulsion noise sources. The present report provides a detailed description of the different test points, their associated instrumentation layouts, and the structure of the acquired data set. Results from various data analyses are reported separately.

Aeroacoustics

Urban Air Mobility Noise: Current Practice, Gaps, and Recommendations

In 2018, NASA formed an Urban Air Mobility Noise Working Group to assemble noise experts from industry, universities and government agencies to identify, discuss, and address urban air mobility (UAM) noise issues. This paper presents a set of high-level goals intended to address barriers associated with UAM noise that may hamper their entry into service. It summarizes the current practice, identifies gaps in the current practice, and makes recommendations to address the gaps to achieve the high-level goals in four areas of interest: Tools and Technologies, Ground and Flight Testing, Human Response and Metrics, and Regulation and Policy.

urban air mobility

2019 DART Source-Diagnostic Test Results Update

This presentation serves as an update to results from the 2019 DART Core Noise Source Diagnostics Test. Modal decomposition results are presented and discussed in addition to a reiteration of the test background and introductory information.

Aeroacoustics

Surface Vibration Measurement and Analysis for UAM/UAS Electric Motor Noise

Urban Air Mobility vehicles are an emerging class of vertical lift vehicles using electric motors to drive multiple rotors for lift. The outrunner electric motors that are commonly used, may be capable of generating noise that could contribute to the vehicle’s overall noise profile and could generate cabin noise. Understanding and predicting the noise requires more knowledge of the rotor vibrations and eventually a model to predict the frequencies of those vibrations. This work presents a measurement of the rotor vibrations of two different small-scale motors. Two techniques to measure the surface vibration were used. The displacement spectra are compared with acoustic measurements. A finite element analysis model is used to predict the rotor resonance frequencies. The predicted frequencies are in fair agreement with the experimentally observed vibration frequencies, but requires further work to understand discrepancies.

Electric Motor Noise

Learjet Flight Test Update

The status of the future jet-noise test using a Lear 25 aircraft is provided. The intent of the test is to provide data for comparisons with scale-model data acquired in the Aero-Acoustic Propulsion Laboratory (AAPL) and a new single-stream jet noise model.

Jet Noise

Single-Stream Empirical Jet Noise Models Based on Scale-Model Data

Accurate single-stream jet-noise models for hot jets in flight are necessary for predicting noise of future commercial supersonic aircraft at takeoff. Previous comparisons between flight data and existing models have shown unacceptably large errors in the predictive tools. In the current effort, acoustic data were acquired in the Aero-Acoustic Propulsion Laboratory at the NASA Glenn Research Center for a single-stream hot jet with a range of operating conditions and simulated flight speeds that include those expected at takeoff of commercial supersonic aircraft. Models are presented for the resulting shape functions used to estimate the average spectra derived from the appropriate scaling of the jet-noise data.

Acoustics

Jet Noise Flyover and Scale Model Tests

Renewed interest in commercial supersonic flight has rekindled the need for accurate jet-noise predictions as this source is believed to dominate at aircraft takeoff conditions. The current study compares scale-model data acquired in the NASA Aero-Acoustic Propulsion Laboratory with data obtained using a well-instrumented Learjet 25 in a flyover test completed in September 2022. The flight test included 73 flyovers with engine conditions ranging from 1.5 to 2.0 engine pressure ratios and flight Mach numbers between 0.24 and 0.27. Acoustic data were acquired with an 800-ft linear ground plate microphone array. Wind speed data were acquired up to 1000-ft altitude with a ground-based LiDAR system. Layered ambient temperature, pressure, and humidity were acquired with a weather drone. A 6% increase in the physical scale factor for the scale-model data was found to reasonably align the peak frequencies of the scale-model and flight data and resulted in peak levels for the scale model being roughly 0.7 dB above those for the flight data at NPR = 1.56 and roughly 1 dB below those for the flight data at NPR = 1.91 in the peak jet-noise direction. Comparisons with the SAE ARP876 model were poor especially at emission angles greater than, or equal to, 110° and at high frequencies.

jet noise, supersonic transport

Jet Noise Flyover and Scale Model Tests

Renewed interest in commercial supersonic flight has rekindled the need for accurate jet-noise predictions as this source is believed to dominate at aircraft takeoff conditions. The current study compares scale-model data acquired in the NASA Aero-Acoustic Propulsion Laboratory with data obtained using a well-instrumented Learjet 25D in a flyover test completed in September 2022. The flight test included 73 flyovers with engine conditions ranging from 1.5 to 2.0 engine pressure ratios and flight Mach numbers between 0.24 and 0.27. Acoustic data were acquired with an 800-ft linear ground plate microphone array. Wind speed data were acquired up to 1000-sft altitude with a ground-based LiDAR system. Layered ambient temperature, pressure, and humidity were acquired with a weather drone. A 6% increase in the physical scale factor for the scale-model data was found to reasonably align the peak frequencies of the scale-model and flight data and resulted in peak levels for the scale model being roughly 0.7 dB above those for the flight data at NPR = 1.56 and roughly 1 dB below those for the flight data at NPR = 1.91 in the peak jet-noise direction. Comparisons with the SAE ARP876 model were poor especially at emission angles greater than, or equal to, 110° and at high frequencies.

Acoustics, jet noise, supersonic transport

Evaluation of Silicon Carbide Pressure Sensor in Turbofan Engine Core Exhaust Nozzle

We report the results of the evaluation of single crystal 4H-silicon carbide piezoresistive pressure sensors that were directly inserted at the compressor and core exhaust nozzle exits, in shear contact with the engine-internal flow streams of the NASA DGEN Aeropropulsion Research Turbofan, where the operating temperatures at maximum power were ~230 oC, and ~460 oC, respectively. In addition to demonstrating sensor survivability during this maiden test, the frequency responses of the silicon-carbide sensors at the core-nozzle exit were compared against industry-standard silicon-based piezoresistive pressure transducers that externally placed, using an infinite-tube-probe arrangement. The low-voltage output of these early-development SiC sensors limited the frequency range with an acceptable signal-to-noise-ratio for the current application to less than about 2,500 Hz. The low output of the SiC sensors were due to a conservative burst-pressure diaphragm design that can be optimized to increase the frequency range. The results from this initial campaign offered insights to aspects of the sensor that would require further improvement, with the goal of achieving full-bandwidth capture of engine unsteady pressure fluctuations by direct interrogation of the flow field in hostile-environment engine-core components.

Silicon Carbide

Learjet Update Flight and Scale-Model-Nozzle Acoustics Test

The impetus for the work is the need for an improved ability to predict takeoff noise of future supersonic commercial transport aircraft. The overall objective is to validate as well as improve the conversion of facility scale-model data and semi-empirical jet-noise predictions to flight noise. Acoustic data from a Learjet-25 flyover test and a complementary rig-test are compared. The uncertainty in the rig-to-flight transformation is presented. Ultimately, the goal is improved noise-prediction methods for system studies of future commercial supersonic aircraft.

Lennart S Hultgren

Acoustic Measurements for the Moog S-250 Vehicle in Hover

Acoustic measurements for hover conditions and electric motor noise tests were conducted for the Moog S-250 research aircraft, an RPM-controlled quadcopter-type Urban Air Mobility (UAM) vehicle with four sets of contra-rotating rotors. The objectives of the study included determining the minimum far-field distance, the noise characteristics, and the potential for electric motor noise to contribute to the overall acoustic radiation for the full-scale UAM vehicle. Acoustic data for full-scale aircraft are critical for determining the impact of these vehicles on the surrounding communities. The results showed the far-field was reached by 8.1 single rotor diameters or 2.7 vehicle diameters as defined by the longest tip-to-tip rotor dimension for the vehicle. In hover, the peak acoustic radiation occurred at a declination angle of roughly 29° below the midplane between the upper and lower rotors. The lowest acoustic levels occurred below the aircraft. The electric motor noise studies, conducted with the rotors removed, showed motor noise radiated at shaft orders 17 – 20, whereas rotor noise covered the range of 2 – 24 shaft orders. There was some evidence that electric motor noise was present in previous ground run-up measurements.

Urban Air Mobility Noise