Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Brian Evans

Publications and source records attributed to Brian Evans.

9 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Mars Ascent Vehicle Hybrid PropulsionEffort

A technology development program was undertaken to determine if the benefits of hybrid rocket propulsion could be realized for a Mars Ascent Vehicle (MAV) application. Specifically, the goal of this program was to increase the Technology Readiness Level (TRL) of a hybrid propulsion system such that it could be considered for a potential Mars Sample Return Campaign. Over the course of approximately five years, a new, wax-based fuel was developed, characterized and tested with Mixed Oxides of Nitrogen (from MON-3 to MON-25). Various ignition mechanisms were tested and solid hypergolic additives were evaluated for their potential to ignite the hybrid motor. Several hot-fire test campaigns were completed at both sub- and full-scale. The technology development program was born out of a JPL study documented by Shotwell and Karp that identified the Single Stage to Orbit (SSTO) hybrid propulsion system for a potential Mars Ascent Vehicle to be the lowest Gross Lift Off Mass option from the ten configurations evaluated. Benefits of the hybrid option included its predicted favorable low temperature storage and operation behavior, high performance and ability to restart (enabling the SSTO). The main disadvantage of the hybrid option was its low TRL,as it essentially started as a blank sheet design with a new fuel development. Near the end of the technology development program, a Preliminary Architecture Assessment (PAA) was completed to evaluate a single-stage hybrid propulsion system and a two-stage solid propulsion system for a potential MAV. The solid propulsion system was selected for further study in 2019, primarily because of its flight heritage. While the hybrid technology development program made many strides, there was still a list of challenges to overcome. This paper will discuss the substantial progress and remaining challenges from the technology development effort from 2015 through 2019. This includes fuel development and reformulation, sub- and full-scale testing at Space Propulsion Group, full scale testing at Parabilis, full scale testing at Whittinghill Aerospace, hypergolic additive testing at Purdue and Penn State and the evaluation of adding hypergolic additives to a full-scale grain. It also includes a discussion of the design that resulted from the Preliminary Architecture Assessment.

hybrid rocket↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Conceptual Thermal Control System Design for a Lunar Surface Habitat

NASA is currently considering a Surface Habitat (SH) to provide 30-60 day habitability for a crew of up to four to explore the Lunar surface at a South Pole location. The SH concept is comprised of an inflatable volume for the habitable space, a metallic airlock and a descent stage with access to a pressurized rover and other surface assets provided through the airlock. A conceptual architecture for the SH Thermal Control System (TCS) is presented with resource estimates. The TCS design employs a dual loop architecture with a water/propylene glycol mix for the internal crew spaces with a freeze tolerant coolant utilized for the external loop. The internal loop is partitioned into low and moderate temperature service with a sublimator available for operational scenarios prior to thermal radiator deployment (or redeployment). Analytical models are utilized to optimize radiator geometry/orientation as well as the TCS internal/external loop architecture. Heritage hardware is utilized for the TCS concept wherever possible and low mass, dust tolerant, deployable/retractable thermal radiators (in partial gravity) present a technology challenge. The TCS must accommodate infrequent eclipse periods lasting up to 100 hours in duration and mitigation strategies to reduce the energy needed to maintain the SH and associated systems above survival temperature limits during this period are explored. Mitigation options include retractable or freezable radiators, other reconfigurable radiator geometries, alternate fluids, re-generable heat exchangers, temperature excursions, thermal energy storage and optimized inflatable optical properties. Finally, TCS sensitivity to SH Electrical Power System (EPS) growth is considered with both operational and dormant impacts quantified.

Thermal Control↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Conceptual Thermal Control System Design for a Lunar Surface Habitat

NASA is currently considering a Surface Habitat (SH) to provide 30-60 day habitability for a crew of up to four to explore the Lunar surface at a South Pole location. The SH concept is comprised of an inflatable volume for the habitable space, a metallic airlock and a descent stage with access to a pressurized rover and other surface assets provided through the airlock. A conceptual architecture for the SH Thermal Control System (TCS) is presented with resource estimates. The TCS design employs a dual loop architecture with a water/propylene glycol mix for the internal crew spaces with a freeze tolerant coolant utilized for the external loop. The internal loop is partitioned into low and moderate temperature service with a sublimator available for operational scenarios prior to thermal radiator deployment (or redeployment). Analytical models are utilized to optimize radiator geometry/orientation as well as the TCS internal/external loop architecture. Heritage hardware is utilized for the TCS concept wherever possible and low mass, dust tolerant, deployable/retractable thermal radiators (in partial gravity) present a technology challenge. The TCS must accommodate infrequent eclipse periods lasting up to 100 hours in duration and mitigation strategies to reduce the energy needed to maintain the SH and associated systems above survival temperature limits during this period are explored. Mitigation options include retractable or freezable radiators, other reconfigurable radiator geometries, alternate fluids, re-generable heat exchangers, temperature excursions, thermal energy storage and optimized inflatable optical properties. Finally, TCS sensitivity to SH Electrical Power System (EPS) growth is considered with both operational and dormant impacts quantified.

Thermal Control↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Thermal Control System Architecture and Technology Challenges for a Lunar Surface Habitat

NASA’s current plans for exploration of the Lunar South Pole region include a Surface Habitat (SH) to provide up to 60-day habitability for a crew of four. The SH concept is comprised of several elements including an inflatable volume for the habitable space and a metallic airlock for access to a pressurized rover and other surface assets. A conceptual architecture for the SH Thermal Control System (TCS) is presented. A TCS dual loop design is utilized with a water/propylene glycol mix for the internal crew spaces and an external loop with low temperature coolant. The internal loop is partitioned into low and moderate temperature service with a sublimator available for operational scenarios prior to thermal radiator deployment (or redeployment). Waste heat is rejected through thermal radiators contained in the external loop. Optimization of the thermal radiator geometry/orientation as well as the TCS internal/external loop architecture is accomplished via analytical models of the system. Low mass, dust tolerant, deployable/retractable thermal radiators (in partial gravity) and thermal control surfaces, along with accommodating infrequent eclipse periods lasting up to 100 hours, present the major technology challenges. Mitigation strategies to reduce the energy needed to maintain the SH and associated systems above survival temperature limits during the eclipse period are considered in the paper. Options include retractable radiators, re-generable heat exchangers, temperature excursions, thermal energy storage and optimized inflatable optical properties. TCS sensitivity to potential SH Electrical Power System (EPS) growth is also a consideration for both operational and dormant mission phases.

Thermal Control System↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Lunar Latitude and Terrain Radiator Sensitivity Study

The thermal environment on the moon is highly complex and diverse. The lunar surface near the equator develops extreme hot average temperatures during the lunar day due to solar flux vectors that are nearly orthogonal to the surface. The lunar poles have a cold and uniquely complex thermal environment with low solar elevation angles and permanently shadowed regions located just kilometers from some of the most highly illuminated regions of the moon. Likewise, the topography can range from very flat crater basins to dramatically tall features such as mountains and crater rims. Consequently, when sizing the radiators of a lunar surface vehicle, the specific thermal environment found in the targeted landing or deployment zone must be well understood to build robust appropriately scaled thermal control systems. Here described are parametric studies that characterize the sensitivity of lunar radiator performance to lunar terrain and latitude. Heat rejection is calculated for different radiator tilt angles in a variety of terrain environments. Radiator performance as a function of underside thermal condition is also characterized at lunar latitudes ranging from equatorial to polar. Impacts of latitude and terrain on radiator performance are quantified, and regions are identified where the thermal environment is more or less favorable for specific radiator designs.

Lunar Vehicle Radiator↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Lunar Latitude and Terrain Radiator Sensitivity Study

The thermal environment on the moon is highly complex and diverse. The lunar surface near the equator develops extreme hot average temperatures during the lunar day due to solar flux vectors that are nearly orthogonal to the surface. The lunar poles have a cold and uniquely complex thermal environment with low solar elevation angles and permanently shadowed regions located just kilometers from some of the most highly illuminated regions of the moon. Likewise, the topography can range from very flat crater basins to dramatically tall features such as mountains and crater rims. Consequently, when sizing the radiators of a lunar surface vehicle, the specific thermal environment found in the targeted landing or deployment zone must be well understood to build robust, appropriately scaled thermal control systems. Here described are parametric studies that characterize the sensitivity of lunar radiator performance to lunar terrain and latitude. Heat rejection is calculated for different radiator tilt angles in a variety of terrain environments. Radiator performance as a function of underside thermal condition is also characterized at lunar latitudes ranging from equatorial to polar. Impacts of latitude and terrain on radiator performance are quantified, and regions are identified where the thermal environment is more or less favorable for specific radiator designs.

Lunar Vehicle Radiator↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Lunar Latitude and Terrain Radiator Sensitivity Study

The thermal environment on the moon is highly complex and diverse. The lunar surface near the equator develops extreme hot average temperatures during the lunar day due to solar flux vectors that are nearly orthogonal to the surface. The lunar poles have a cold and uniquely complex thermal environment with low solar elevation angles and permanently shadowed regions located just kilometers from some of the most highly illuminated regions of the moon. Likewise, the topography can range from very flat crater basins to dramatically tall features such as mountains and crater rims. Consequently, when sizing the radiators of a lunar surface vehicle, the specific thermal environment found in the targeted landing or deployment zone must be well understood to build robust, appropriately scaled thermal control systems. Here described are parametric studies that characterize the sensitivity of lunar radiator performance to lunar terrain and latitude. Heat rejection is calculated for different radiator tilt angles in a variety of terrain environments. Radiator performance as a function of underside thermal condition is also characterized at lunar latitudes ranging from equatorial to polar. Impacts of latitude and terrain on radiator performance are quantified, and regions are identified where the thermal environment is more or less favorable for specific radiator designs.

Lunar Thermal Analysis↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Lunar Latitude and Terrain Radiator Sensitivity Study

The thermal environment on the moon is highly complex and diverse. The lunar surface near the equator develops extreme hot average temperatures during the lunar day due to solar flux vectors that are nearly orthogonal to the surface. The lunar poles have a cold and uniquely complex thermal environment with low solar elevation angles and permanently shadowed regions located just kilometers from some of the most highly illuminated regions of the moon. Likewise, the topography can range from very flat crater basins to dramatically tall features such as mountains and crater rims. Consequently, when sizing the radiators of a lunar surface vehicle, the specific thermal environment found in the targeted landing or deployment zone must be well understood to build robust appropriately scaled thermal control systems. Here described are parametric studies that characterize the sensitivity of lunar radiator performance to lunar terrain and latitude. Heat rejection is calculated for different radiator tilt angles in a variety of terrain environments. Radiator performance as a function of underside thermal condition is also characterized at lunar latitudes ranging from equatorial to polar. Impacts of latitude and terrain on radiator performance are quantified, and regions are identified where the thermal environment is more or less favorable for specific radiator designs.

Lunar Vehicle Radiator↗