Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Brodan Richter

Publications and source records attributed to Brodan Richter.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2024

Correlations of Additive Manufacturing Model-Based Process Metrics With Spatter-Induced Porosity in the Powder Bed Fusion-Laser Beam/Metallic Process

Components fabricated using the powder bed fusion laser beam metallic (PBF-LB/M) additive manufacturing (AM) process comprise a multitude of sequential weld passes. Qualifying materials for components in critical applications requires a thorough understanding of pertinent processing-microstructure-property relationships. Porosity defects have a strong adverse effect on the mechanical properties of a material. The morphology of porosity defects created by lack of fusion in PBF-LB/M often exhibit high aspect ratios that can act as stress concentrators and become crack initiation sites. The occurrence of spatter induced porosity is studied using synchronized AM model-based process metrics and porosity measured by high-resolution X-ray computed tomography. A novel AM process metric is introduced to quantify the relative exposure to spatter ejecta impacts and incorporation throughout the sequence of the PBF-LB/M process. Further characterization using optical metallography and scanning electron microscopy indicated that both keyhole and lack of fusion porosity correlated statistically with the spatter ejecta impact field of the PBF-LB/M process. Both keyhole and lack of fusion porosity can be predicted by the spatter exposure process metric, which can be exploited to control the fusion sequence.

Additive Manufacturing↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Comparison of In-situ Near Infrared Melt Pool Imagery to Optical Microscopy Measurements

Additive manufacturing (AM) is a rapidly growing technology. An area of major importance is the integrity and repeatability of AM parts. The goal is to reduce obstacles to certify AM built parts to allow for use in critical aerospace applications. In-situ nondestructive evaluation sensors can be used for build assessment and can potentially play a key role in certifying AM parts. For example, melt pool features are understood to have a strong correlation to microstructural defects and the use of a near infrared (NIR) camera can be used to record the melt pool, cooling areas, and temperature gradients during the build. This work explores the use of a low cost NIR camera to obtain single line track imagery of the Ti-6Al-4V melt pools for various processing parameters. The NIR camera is radiometrically calibrated and configured in-line with the laser source to obtain high resolution imagery of the melt pool shape and dynamics. The challenge to measure melt pool shapes is to identify the transition points between the metal solid to liquid phase. Factors for melt pool measurements such as thermal camera pixel resolution, surface emissivity, and blurring due to the laser beam movement are discussed. Lastly, the melt pool imagery are compared to optical microscopy measurements for validation.

additive manufacturing↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Towards Qualification and Certification of Laser Powder Bed Fusion Ti-6Al-4V with In-Situ Process Monitoring and Automated Defect Detection

Qualification and certification of laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) parts are two challenges that must be answered to ensure suitability for critical applications. In-situ monitoring using high frame rate thermal and conventional optical imaging sensors is applied to the LPBF build process. Currently, the large volume of data from such sensors becomes untenable for manual inspection in production environments. This presentation serves to address this in-situ monitoring deficiency in two ways. First, a framework for managing data streams from LPBF process monitoring sensors is described. Second, two candidate image analysis techniques are presented: one is a set of heuristics that are easily interpretable, and the other is an uninterpretable convolutional neural network. These strategies are compared in terms of performance, computational expense, and speed. These methodologies represent platforms for connecting processing conditions to process modeling efforts aligned with the qualification and certification mission for LPBF Ti-6Al-4V components.

Qualification↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

In-Situ Process Monitoring, Synchronization, and Mapping Laser Powder Bed Fusion Builds of Ti6Al4V

The use of in-situ process monitoring is of interest to lower the cost of inspection for the qualification of laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) parts. Precise monitoring of the LPBF-AM build process constitutes a multi-scale and multi-discipline task. There are several significant challenges to the in-situ approach: the synchronization of sensor signals to process steps, the physical interpretation and classification of sensor signals, managing very large datasets, and comparing the inputs with the observed monitoring signals. At NASA Langley Research Center, a configurable architecture additive testbed has been developed to monitor the build process with synchronized sensors. The philosophy and method adopted for the synchronization of the cameras with laser power & position Ti-6Al-4V LPBF are described. The synchronized in-situ monitoring signals are compared with ex-situ nondestructive inspection and optical microscopy observations. Such comparisons permit a better understanding of how the sequential process actions of LPBF-AM can affect build quality.

Laser Powder Bed Fusion↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Additive Manufacturing Model-Based Process Metrics: Reduced Order Modeling of the Laser Powder Bed Fusion Process

The multi-scale and complex process of printing additively manufactured (AM) parts can have unexpected, but predictable, build conditions that result in material microstructure variability. In this work, we describe a fully parallel reduced order modeling approach that has been developed to evaluate the evolution of AM processes, termed the AM moment measure method. This method couples the known sequence of the AM process with a physically informed nearest neighbors’ calculation to map the conditions of a part-scale build. The result is a map of the build that is derived directly from build files or in-situ process monitoring sensors. The methodology and terminology of the approach will be described, and computed build maps will be calculated and compared for various laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) builds of Ti-6Al-4V. Such comparative results develop understanding of how the sequential process actions can affect the LPBF-AM build quality and microstructure variability.

Laser Powder Bed Fusion↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Powder Bed Fusion Laser Beam Metals Additive Manufacturing: Process Monitoring Approaches for Qualification and Certification

The use of in-situ process monitoring is of interest to lower the cost of inspection for the qualification of powder bed fusion laser beam metal (PBF-LB/M) additively manufactured (AM) parts. Precise monitoring of the PBF-LB/M AM build process constitutes a multi-scale and multi-discipline task. There are several significant challenges to the in-situ approach: the synchronization of sensor signals to process steps; the physical interpretation and classification of sensor signals; managing very large datasets; and comparing the inputs with the observed monitoring signals. At NASA Langley Research Center, a configurable architecture additive testbed has been developed to monitor the build process with synchronized sensors. The philosophy and method adopted for the synchronization of the cameras with laser power and position throughout a complex PBF-LB/M AM build will be described. The synchronized in-situ monitoring signals are compared with ex-situ nondestructive inspection, x-ray computed tomography (XCT). Such comparisons permit a better understanding of how the sequential process actions of LPBF-AM can affect build quality. The multi-scale and complex process of printing additively manufactured (AM) parts can have unexpected, but predictable, build conditions that result in material microstructure variability. This presentation will describe an additive manufacturing model-based process metric (AM-PM) computational method that is a fully parallel reduced order modeling approach developed to evaluate the evolution of AM processes. This method couples the known sequence of the AM process with a physically informed nearest neighbors’ calculation to map the conditions of a part-scale build. The result is a map of the build that is derived directly from build files or in-situ process monitoring sensors. The methodology of the approach will be described and mapped to the porosity observed from XCT for a complex PBF-LB/M build. Such comparative results develop understanding of how the sequential process actions can affect the PBF-LB/M AM build quality and microstructure variability.

Laser Powder Bed Fusion↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Database Design Strategies for Coordinated Simulation and Testing in Additive Manufacturing

The qualification and certification (Q&C) process presents a significant challenge for widespread adoption of additive manufacturing (AM) materials and processes for aerospace applications. A relational database framework will be presented as a tool for data curation of coordinated experimental and computational materials modeling research activities. A comparison of relational and hierarchical data structures in this domain will be emphasized through the evolution of a database design strategy. This framework’s mission is to support the advancement of computational materials-informed Q&C by providing the necessary data infrastructure to trace reliability and reproducibility measures through unified AM materials simulation and experimental testing. FAIR (findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable) data will be highlighted as a necessary precursor for automation of specific actions, which ultimately reduces the time and expense burden for Q&C. The discussion will be mostly limited to back-end design elements, though a few front-end user experience examples will also be shared.

Qualification↗