Cassini spacecraft RTG's power and thermal analysis during the 20 year mission
UNKNOWN
Burk, Thomas A.↗
Engineering topics
Burk, Thomas A.
Publications and source records attributed to Burk, Thomas A..
Cassini power during the 20 year mission and until the final plunge into Saturn
UNKNOWN
Burk, Thomas A.↗
Cassini Power During the 20 Year Mission and Until the Final Plunge into Saturn
The NASA-ESA Cassini mission ended on September 15, 2017, after almost 20 years of operations. Electrical power telemetry data is presented for the entire mission from launch and End Of Mission (EOM). The Cassini spacecraft was powered by three Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generators (RTGs) connected in parallel. These three RTGs generated 882.1 W at the beginning of the mission. At EOM, the power level was 600.3 W. The electrical output of Cassini’s power subsystem decayed consistently, as predicted, during the entire mission between October 1997 and September 2017. Further, no heating of the RTGs was reported in telemetry during the last minutes of the mission, nor was there any variance apparent in the final output of the three RTGs that is attributable to the final plunge into Saturn.
Burk, Thomas A.↗
Cassini Spacecraft Attitude Control System: Flight Performance and Lessons Learned, 1997-2017
A sophisticated interplanetary spacecraft, Cassini/Huygens was launched on October 15, 1997. Since achieving orbit at Saturn in 2004, Cassini has collected science data throughout its four-year prime mission (2004–08), and has since been approved for first and second extended missions through September 2017. The Cassini Attitude and Articulation Control Subsystem (AACS) is perhaps the spacecraft subsystem that must satisfy the most mission and science pointing requirements. Since launch, the performance of the Cassini AACS design has been superb. All key mission and science requirements are met with significant margins. An overview of the flight performance of the Cassini attitude control system as well as AACS mission operation-centric lessons learned, from launch to 2017, are described by topics. Many of these lessons learned should be applicable to the safe operations of other interplanetary missions. Processes taken by the AACS operation team to guard against “human” errors are also outlined in this paper.
Lee, Allan Y.↗
High Fidelity Reconstructed Attitude Estimation Using Cassini Flight Telemetry
The Cassini Grand Finale capped the 20 year Cassini mission with 22 one-week-long orbits each with periapsis inside the ring plane just above Saturn’s cloud tops. One aspect of these remarkable orbits was unprecedented measurements of Saturn’s magnetic field very close to the planet. Processing this data required precise estimates of Cassini’s orientation during these ring plane crossings. These periods coincided with planned gyro-only attitude propagation due to the enormous bright bodies in the star tracker field-of-view. This paper describes how attitude reacquisition information, when the star tracker reacquires an absolute inertial reference, can be used to correct errors introduced during gyro-only propagation. The resulting high fidelity reconstruction significantly improves the extraction of Saturn’s magnetic field from the raw data obtained during gyro-only periods when Cassini’s changing orientation makes precise attitude estimation a challenge.
Burk, Thomas A.↗
Extended Bright Bodies - Flight and Ground Software Challenges on the Cassini Mission at Saturn
No abstract available
Sung, Tina S.↗
Thruster-Specific Force Estimation and Trending of Cassini Hydrazine Thrusters at Saturn
No abstract available
Stupik, Joan↗
Extended Bright Bodies - Flight and Ground Software Challenges on the Cassini Mission at Saturn
Extended bright bodies in the Saturn environment such as Saturn's rings, the planet itself, and Saturn's satellites near the Cassini spacecraft may interfere with the star tracker's ability to find stars. These interferences can create faulty spacecraft attitude knowledge, which would decrease the pointing accuracy or even trip a fault protection response on board the spacecraft. The effects of the extended bright body interference were observed in December of 2000 when Cassini flew by Jupiter. Based on this flight experience and expected star tracker behavior at Saturn, the Cassini AACS operations team defined flight rules to suspend the star tracker during predicted interference windows. The flight rules are also implemented in the existing ground software called Kinematic Predictor Tool to create star identification suspend commands to be uplinked to the spacecraft for future predicted interferences. This paper discusses the details of how extended bright bodies impact Cassini's acquisition of attitude knowledge, how the observed data helped the ground engineers in developing flight rules, and how automated methods are used in the flight and ground software to ensure the spacecraft is continuously operated within these flight rules. This paper also discusses how these established procedures will continue to be used to overcome new bright body challenges that Cassini will encounter during its dips inside the rings of Saturn for its final orbits of a remarkable 20-year mission at Saturn.
Sung, Tina S.↗
Thruster-Specific Force Estimation and Trending of Cassini Hydrazine Thrusters at Saturn
The Cassini spacecraft has been in orbit around Saturn since 2004 and has since been approved for both a first and second extended mission. As hardware reaches and exceeds its documented life expectancy, it becomes vital to closely monitor hardware performance. The performance of the 1-N hydrazine attitude control thrusters is especially important to study, because the spacecraft is currently operating on the back-up thruster branch. Early identification of hardware degradation allows more time to develop mitigation strategies. There is no direct measure of an individual thruster's thrust magnitude, but these values can be estimated by post-processing spacecraft telemetry. This paper develops an algorithm to calculate the individual thrust magnitudes using Euler's equation. The algorithm correctly shows the known degradation in the first thruster branch, validating the approach. Results for the current thruster branch show nominal performance as of August, 2015.
Stupik, Joan↗
Precise Pointing for Radio Science Occultations and Radar Mapping During the Cassini Mission at Saturn
This paper discusses the implementation challenges and lessons learned from radar and radio science pointing observations during the Cassini mission at Saturn. Implementation of the precise desired pointing reveals key issues in the ground system, the flight system, and the pointing paradigm itself. To achieve accurate pointing on some observations, specific workarounds had to be implemented and folded into the sequence development process. Underlying Cassini's pointing system is a remarkable construct known as Inertial Vector Propagation.
Burk, Thomas A.↗
Titan Density Reconstruction Using Radiometric and Cassini Attitude Control Flight Data
This paper compares three different methods of Titan atmospheric density reconstruction for the Titan 87 Cassini flyby. T87 was a unique flyby that provided independent Doppler radiometric measurements on the ground throughout the flyby including at Titan closest approach. At the same time, the onboard accelerometer provided an independent estimate of atmospheric drag force and density during the flyby. These results are compared with the normal method of reconstructing atmospheric density using thruster on-time and angular momentum accumulation. Differences between the estimates are analyzed and a possible explanation for the differences is evaluated.
Andrade, Luis G., Jr.↗
Cassini at Saturn Proximal Orbits - Attitude Control Challenges
The Cassini mission at Saturn will come to an end in the spring and summer of 2017 with a series of 22 orbits that will dip inside the rings of Saturn. These are called proximal orbits and will conclude with spacecraft disposal into the atmosphere of the ringed world on September 15, 2017. These unique orbits that cross the ring plane only a few thousand kilometers above the cloud tops of the planet present new attitude control challenges for the Cassini operations team. Crossing the ring plane so close to the inner edge of the rings means that the Cassini orientation during the crossing will be tailored to protect the sensitive electronics bus of the spacecraft. This orientation will put the sun sensors at some extra risk so this paper discusses how the team prepares for dust hazards. Periapsis is so close to the planet that spacecraft controllability with RCS thrusters needs to be evaluated because of the predicted atmospheric torque near closest approach to Saturn. Radiation during the ring plane crossings will likely trigger single event transients in some attitude control sensors. This paper discusses how the attitude control team deals with radiation hazards. The angular size and unique geometry of the rings and Saturn near periapsis means that star identification will be interrupted and this paper discusses how the safe mode attitude is selected to best deal with these large bright bodies during the proximal orbits.
Huygens↗
Avoiding Human Error in Mission Operations: Cassini Flight Experience
Operating spacecraft is a never-ending challenge and the risk of human error is ever- present. Many missions have been significantly affected by human error on the part of ground controllers. The Cassini mission at Saturn has not been immune to human error, but Cassini operations engineers use tools and follow processes that find and correct most human errors before they reach the spacecraft. What is needed are skilled engineers with good technical knowledge, good interpersonal communications, quality ground software, regular peer reviews, up-to-date procedures, as well as careful attention to detail and the discipline to test and verify all commands that will be sent to the spacecraft. Two areas of special concern are changes to flight software and response to in-flight anomalies. The Cassini team has a lot of practical experience in all these areas and they have found that well-trained engineers with good tools who follow clear procedures can catch most errors before they get into command sequences to be sent to the spacecraft. Finally, having a robust and fault-tolerant spacecraft that allows ground controllers excellent visibility of its condition is the most important way to ensure human error does not compromise the mission.
guidance and control↗
Cassini Orbit Trim Maneuvers at Saturn - Overview of Attitude Control Flight Operations
The Cassini spacecraft has been in orbit around Saturn since July 1, 2004. To remain on the planned trajectory which maximizes science data return, Cassini must perform orbit trim maneuvers using either its main engine or its reaction control system thrusters. Over 200 maneuvers have been executed on the spacecraft since arrival at Saturn. To improve performance and maintain spacecraft health, changes have been made in maneuver design command placement, in accelerometer scale factor, and in the pre-aim vector used to align the engine gimbal actuator prior to main engine burn ignition. These and other changes have improved maneuver performance execution errors significantly since 2004. A strategy has been developed to decide whether a main engine maneuver should be performed, or whether the maneuver can be executed using the reaction control system.
spacecraft configuration↗
Managing Cassini Safe Mode Attitude at Saturn
The Cassini spacecraft was launched on October 15, 1997 and arrived at Saturn on June 30, 2004. It has performed detailed observations and remote sensing of Saturn, its rings, and its satellites since that time. In the event safe mode interrupts normal orbital operations, Cassini has flight software fault protection algorithms to detect, isolate, and recover to a thermally safe and commandable attitude and then wait for further instructions from the ground. But the Saturn environment is complex, and safety hazards change depending on where Cassini is in its orbital trajectory around Saturn. Selecting an appropriate safe mode attitude that insures safe operation in the Saturn environment, including keeping the star tracker field of view clear of bright bodies, while maintaining a quiescent, commandable attitude, is a significant challenge. This paper discusses the Cassini safe table management strategy and the key criteria that must be considered, especially during low altitude flybys of Titan, in deciding what spacecraft attitude should be used in the event of safe mode.
Attitude Control↗