Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Burnside, Nathan

Publications and source records attributed to Burnside, Nathan.

Initial Calibrations and Wind Tunnel Test Results for an In-Flow Reference Array Using New In-Flow Acoustic Sources in Four Array Mount Configurations

This paper describes efforts to develop a small in-flow phased microphone array as a reference acoustic sensor and quantify its level-measurement accuracy with new in-flow calibration sources. The devices can be applied to a wide variety of in- and out-of-flow measurement applications and test facilities. Recent tests of the array and two calibration sources in the NASA Anechoic Chamber and Army 7- by 10-foot Wind Tunnel at NASA Ames Research Center demonstrated that the array was functional over a frequency range of 2 to 100 kilohertz for emission angles of 92 degrees, 108 degrees, and 120 degrees, and Mach numbers of 0, 0.15, and 0.25. The array and calibration sources were then used to assess the relative effects of array installation on background noise and level measurement accuracy by locating the array in the flow (strut- and wall-mounted) as well as outside the flow behind a porous wall screen and a free shear layer. The wind tunnel array measurements were compared with anechoic chamber measurements using discrete microphones at the same source distance and emission angles. At 92 degrees, the noise floor and attenuation spectra were comparable (within 5 decibels) for each installation from 2 to 30 kilohertz. At higher angles, the array installation behind the Kevlar screen had the lowest noise floor at M = 0.15 and 0.25. The array installation 10 inches (maximum available distance) behind a free shear layer had higher background noise that is typically reduced to a lower level by moving the array back further from the flow. For emission angles greater than 92 degrees, both the Kevlar and free shear layer installations exhibited stronger attenuations in measured level, beginning at lower frequencies than either the wall- or strut-mount configurations. Additional array and calibration source units of the same design are being tested at NASA’s Glenn Research Center and Langley Research Center in their aeroacoustic research facilities in an effort to improve measurement accuracy and repeatability.

Aeroacoustic Wind Tunnel Research↗

Unsteady Pressures on a Generic Capsule Shape

While developing the aerodynamic database for the Orion spacecraft, the low-speed flight regime (transonic and below) proved to be the most difficult to predict and measure accurately. The flow over the capsule heat shield in descent flight was particularly troublesome for both computational and experimental efforts due to its unsteady nature and uncertainty about the boundary layer state. The data described here were acquired as part of a study to improve the understanding of the overall flow around a generic capsule. The unsteady pressure measurements acquired on a generic capsule shape are presented along with a discussion about the effects of various flight conditions and heat-shield surface roughness on the resulting pressure fluctuations.

Wake Flow↗

Low-Cost Phased Microphone Array Design for Moderate-Scale Aeroacoustics Tests

A new wall-mounted phased microphone array was designed, built, and calibrated for testing in closed or open test section wind tunnels. Two configurations were evaluated - one with microphone plate flush with the tunnel surface and the other with microphone plate recessed behind a porous screen. The arrays were successfully operated to Mach number of 0.4 and were calibrated using an in-flow speaker source during a recent study at the AEDC NFAC 40- by 80-Ft Wind Tunnel at NASA Ames.

Horne, Clifton↗

Acoustic Surveys of a Scaled-Model CESTOL Transport Aircraft in Static and Forward Speed Conditions

An 11% scale-model of a Cruise-Efficient Short Take-off and Landing (CESTOL) scalemodel test was recently completed. The test was conducted in the AEDC National Full-Scale Aerodynamic Complex (NFAC) 40- by 80-Foot Wind Tunnel at NASA Ames Research Center. The model included two over-wing pod-mounted turbine propulsion simulators (TPS). The hybrid blended wing-body used a circulation control wing (CCW) with leadingand trailing-edge blowing. The bulk of the test matrix included three forward velocities (40 kts, 60 kts, and 100kts), angle-of-attack variation between -5 and 25 , and CCW mass flow variation. Seven strut-mounted microphones outboard of the left wing provided source directivity. A phased microphone array was mounted outboard of the right wing for source location. The goal of this paper is to provide a preliminary look at the acoustic data acquired during the Advanced Model for Extreme Lift and Improved Aeroacoustics (AMELIA) test for 0 angle-of-attack and 0 sideslip conditions. Data presented provides a good overview of the test conditions and the signal-to-noise quality of the data. TPS height variation showed a difference of 2 dB to 3 dB due to wing shielding. Variation of slot mass flow showed increases of 12 dB to 26 dB above the airframe noise and the TPS increased the overall levels an additional 5 dB to 10 dB.

Burnside, Nathan↗