Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Burrows, J.

Publications and source records attributed to Burrows, J..

3 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2006

Using SCIAMACHY and Ground-based FTS Measurements to Test the OCO X(sub CO2) Retrieval and Validation Approach

Global, space-based observations of atmospheric CO2 with precision, resolution, and coverage needed to monitor sources and sinks: a) Spectra of reflected/scattered sunlight in NIR CO2 and O2 bands used to estimate X(sub CO2) with large sensitivity to surface; b) A-train orbit (1:15 PM polar sun sync); c) 16 day repeat cycle samples seasonal cycle on semi-monthly intervals; and d) NASA ESSP (Earth Space System Pathfinder) scheduled for Sept 2008 launch; 2 yrs lifetime. Initial comparison of SCIAMACHY and FTS retrievals for Park Falls: a) Positive bias in X(sub CO2) of approx. 10 ppm; and b) Negative bias in surface pressure After correction of spectral artifacts in O2A band: a) Largely improved agreement between SCIAMACHY and FTS X(sub CO2) (without clear bias) and in surface pressure; and b) Standard deviation of SCIAMACHY X(sub CO2 approx. 6 ppm. Good qualitative agreement with GEOS-CHEM, with GEOS-CHEM underestimating seasonal cycle. OCO is a dedicated CO2 instrument and will achieve much higher accuracy and precision: a) much higher spectral resolution (by factor of 20); and b) smaller ground pixels (by factor of 600).

CO2 measurements↗
NASA NTRS2004

Can One Satellite Data Set Validation Another? Validation of Envisat SCIAMACHY Data by Comparisons with NOAA-16 SBUV/2 and ERS-2 GOME

Validation of satellite data remains a high priority for the construction of climate data sets. Traditionally ground based measurements have provided the primary comparison data for validation. For some atmospheric parameters such as ozone, a thoroughly validated satellite data record can be used to validate a new instrument s data product in addition to using ground based data. Comparing validated data with new satellite data has several advantages; availability of much more data, which will improve precision, larger geographical coverage, and the footprints are closer in size, which removes uncertainty due to different observed atmospheric volumes. To demonstrate the applicability and some limitations of this technique, observations from the newly launched SCIAMACHY instrument were compared with the NOM-16 SBW/2 and ERS-2 GOME instruments. The SBW/2 data had all ready undergone validation by comparing to the total ozone ground network. Overall the SCIAMACHY data were found to low by 3% with respect to satellite data and 1% low with respect to ground station data. There appears to be seasonal and or solar zenith angle dependences in the comparisons with SBW/2 where differences increase with higher solar zenith angles. It is known that accuracies in both satellite and ground based total ozone algorithms decrease at high solar zenith angles. There is a strong need for more accurate measurement from and the ground under these conditions. At the present time SCIAMACHY data are limited and longer data set with more coverage in both hemispheres is needed to unravel the cause of these differences.

Hilsenrath, E.↗