Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Burrows, Lauren C.

Publications and source records attributed to Burrows, Lauren C..

5 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2024

Cryptate binding energies towards high throughput chelator design: metadynamics ensembles with cluster–continuum solvation

A tiered forcefield/semiempirical/meta-GGA pipeline together with a thermodynamic scheme designed with error cancellation in mind was developed to calculate binding energies of [2.2.2] cryptate complexes of mono- and divalent cations. Stable complexes of Na, K, Rb, Ca, Zn and Pb were generated, revealing consistent cation–N lengths but highly variable cation–O lengths and an amine stacking mechanism potentially augmenting the cation size selectivity. Metadynamics, used for searching the high-dimensional potential energy surface, together with a cluster–continuum model for affordable – yet accurate – solvation modeling, enabled the discovery of more stable geometries than those previously reported. Similar solvation energy curve shapes for lone vs. coordinated ions enabled rapid solvation convergence via the cancellation of errors stemming from finite cluster sizes. In conclusion, an R 2 of 0.850 vs. experimental aqueous binding energies was obtained, validating this scheme as the backbone of a high-throughput workflow for chelator design.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗
DOE OSTI2023

CO 2 -Soluble Nonionic Surfactants for Enhanced CO 2 Storage via In Situ Foam Generation

Geologic carbon storage (GCS) is a rapidly evolving technology with the potential to reduce the environmental impact of fos-sil fuels. Saline aquifers, which comprise a sandstone matrix with brine in the pores, make up much of the pore space availa-ble for CO 2 storage in the United States. When CO 2 is injected in saline aquifers, however, capillary fingering occurs and only a small percentage of the pore space is filled with CO 2 . This is due to the low viscosity of CO 2 , which is roughly ten times less viscous than brine. To address this problem, we tested the ability of inexpensive, commercially available nonionic surfactants to be dissolved in the injected CO 2 and increase the apparent viscosity of CO 2 by generating CO 2 -in-water foams in situ.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗
DOE OSTI2022

Dissolving Nonionic Surfactants in CO 2 to Improve Oil Recovery in Unconventional Reservoirs via Wettability Alteration

CO 2 injection is a promising method for enhanced oil recovery (EOR) in unconventional shale reservoirs. Here, in this work, we postulate that CO 2 EOR may be improved by the dissolution of surfactants into CO 2 . Although CO 2 is a relatively good solvent for oil, we show that CO 2 and Eagle Ford oil are immiscible at compositions above 70 wt % CO 2 , even at pressures as high as 62 MPa. The presence of a CO 2 –oil interface at reservoir conditions indicates that the addition of a surfactant has the potential to improve oil recovery–via wettability alteration from oil-wet to CO 2 -wet, CO 2 –oil interfacial tension (IFT) reduction, or both. Three nonionic surfactants (branched tridecyl ethoxylate Indorama SURFONIC TDA-9, branched nonylphenol ethoxylate Indorama SURFONIC N-100, and linear dodecyl ethoxylate Indorama SURFONIC L12-6) were evaluated for CO 2 -solubility, shale wettability alteration, effect on CO 2 –oil IFT, ability to generate CO 2 –oil foams, and ability to increase oil extraction from Eagle Ford, Mancos, and Bakken shale cores. Each surfactant dissolved in CO 2 up to 1 wt % at pressures and temperatures commensurate with CO 2 EOR. CO 2 -dissolved surfactants did not significantly affect CO 2 –oil IFT or generate CO2–oil foams, but they did induce a dramatic change in the contact angle of an oil droplet on an oil-aged shale chip in CO 2 from strongly oil-wet (11°) toward intermediate CO 2 –oil wettability (82°) (at 80 °C, 27.6 MPa). The branched tridecyl ethoxylated surfactant, SURFONIC TDA-9, afforded the highest oil recovery in core soaking experiments–75%, compared to 71% by pure CO 2 . Analysis of oil extracts by gas chromatography revealed that heavier oil components were produced when the surfactant was added to CO 2 . These results indicate that CO 2 -dissolved surfactants may increase oil recovery from shale by wettability alteration from oil-wet toward CO 2 -wet.

04 OIL SHALES AND TAR SANDS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Reactivity of CO 2 with Utica, Marcellus, Barnett, and Eagle Ford Shales and Impact on Permeability

We report that in order to reduce greenhouse gas emissions while recovering hydrocarbons from unconventional shale formations, processes that make use of carbon dioxide to enhance oil recovery while storing carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) should be considered. Here, we examine samples from three shale basins across the United States (Utica and Marcellus Shales in the Appalachian Basin, Barnett Shale in the Bend Arch-Ft. Worth Basin, and Eagle Ford in the Western Gulf Basin) to address the following questions: (1) do changes from reaction with CO 2 and fluids at the micrometer and nanometer scale alter flow pathways and, in turn, impact hydrocarbon production, CO 2 storage, and seal integrity and (2) can CO 2 or fluid reactivity be predicted based on physical or chemical properties of shale formations? Experiments were conducted at 40 °C and 10.3 MPa to characterize the interaction between CO 2 and shale using X-ray diffraction (XRD), carbon and sulfur analysis, in situ Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), feature relocation scanning electron microscopy coupled with energy-dispersive spectroscopy (SEM-EDS), mercury (Hg) intrusion porosimetry, and Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface area and pore size analysis coupled with density functional theory (DFT) methods. Changes in mechanical, physical, and flow properties of shale cores due to CO 2 exposure were addressed using a New England Research Autolab 1500 and Xenon X-ray computed tomography (CT) scanning. Results showed that CO 2 did not promote significant reactivity with the shale if water was not present; only shales with swelling clays or residual interstitial pore water reacted with dry CO 2 to promote reactivity in shale. When water was added as a reactant, CO 2 formed carbonic acid and reacted with the shale to dissolve carbonate pockets, etched and pitted the shale matrix surfaces, and increased the microporosity and decreased nanoporosity. Porosity and permeability increased appreciably in core shale samples after exposure to CO 2 saturated fluid due to dissolution of carbonate. Shale mechanical properties were not altered. Trends were not observed that could tie CO 2 or fluid reactivity to physical or chemical properties of the shale formations at the basin scale from the samples we examined. However, if the shale contained significant amounts of carbonate and water was available to react with the CO 2 , pore sizes were altered in the matrix and permeability and porosity increased.

04 OIL SHALES AND TAR SANDS↗