Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Cappellari, J. O., Jr.

Publications and source records attributed to Cappellari, J. O., Jr..

Experiences in Interagency and International Interfaces for Mission Support

The Flight Dynamics Division (FDD) of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Goddard Space Flight Center (GFSC) provides extensive support and products for Space Shuttle missions, expendable launch vehicle launches, and routine on-orbit operations for a variety of spacecraft. A major challenge in providing support for these missions is defining and generating the products required for mission support and developing the method by which these products are exchanged between supporting agencies. As interagency and international cooperation has increased in the space community, the FDD customer base has grown and with it the number and variety of external interfaces and product definitions. Currently, the FDD has working interfaces with the NASA Space and Ground Networks, the Johnson Space Center, the White Sands Complex, the Jet propulsion Laboratory (including the Deep Space Network), the United States Air Force, the Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales, the German Spaceflight Operations Center, the European Space Agency, and the National Space Development Agency of Japan. With the increasing spectrum of possible data product definitions and delivery methods, the FDD is using its extensive interagency experience to improve its support of established customers and to provide leadership in adapting/developing new interfaces. This paper describes the evolution of the interfaces between the FDD and its customers, discusses many of the joint activities ith these customers, and summarizes key lessons learned that can be applied to current and future support.

Dell, G. T.↗

Capabilities of a single TDRS to support user orbit determination

It is shown that the single-TDRS S-band tracking configuration satisfies the navigation certification requirements for operational orbit determination support for the Landsat-5, SMM, SME, and Earth Radiation Budget Satellite (ERBS) spacecraft. It is also shown that a pair of 3-min bilateration ranging transponder system (BRTS) tracking passes every 4 hrs, one each from two different BRTS locations, is sufficient to maintain user orbit accuracy to the navigation certification requirements. The BRTS tracking requirements for the single-TDRS configuration will also apply to each TDRS in a multiple-TDRS configuration.

Cappellari, J. O., Jr.↗

Evaluation of spacecraft navigation using the Tracking and Data Relay Satellite System (TDRSS)

The navigational capabilities of the TDRSS for the operational support of user spacecraft is evaluated. A batch-weighted least-squares algorithm is used to fit tracking measurements and to generate orbit solutions for the TDRS-E spacecraft and the following user spacecraft: (1) the SMM, (2) the Landsat-5, (3) the Earth Radiation Budget Satellite (ERBS), and (4) the Solar Mesosphere Explorer (SME). TDRS-E orbit accuracy was evaluated by using the consistency of consecutive orbit solutions as a measure; user orbit accuracy was estimated by comparing orbits determined from TDRSS tracking with orbits obtained from ground tracking for the same time periods. It was found that the predicted accuracy of the TDRS-E orbit propagation was improved by as much as seven times by refining the spherical harmonic expansion model of the earth's potential field. The results obtained for SMM were fairly consistent, while those obtained for Landsat-5 were consistent to better than 80 meters. The orbits obtained using ERBS tracking were consistent to better than 60 meters and the SME orbits for two arcs with 14 and 20 passes of TDRSS tracking had a maximum position difference of 140 meters.

Samii, M. V.↗

A comparative study of atmospheric density models in the context of definitive and predictive earth satellite orbit determination

The results of a comparative orbit determination study of four global atmospheric density models (modified Harris-Priester, Jacchia-Roberts, Mass Spectrometer/Incoherent Scatter (MSIS), and Simple Exponential Model (SEM)) are presented. Utilizing these models, definitive orbit determination consistency and accuracy are evaluated using the maximum position differences that occur during 6-hour overlap periods between ephemerides generated from 30-hour data arcs. Propagated ephemerides are compared with definitive orbit solutions to evaluate predictive accuracy. The results indicate that, for satellites above 300 kilometers, all four atmospheric density models produce comparable orbit determination accuracies when an atmospheric drag scaling factor and the satellite state vector are estimated in the orbit determination process.

Shanklin, R. E., Jr.↗