Reconstructed Flight Performance of the Powered Descent Guidance and Control System for the Mars 2020 Perseverance Mission
No abstract provided
Casoliva, Jordi↗
Engineering topics
Casoliva, Jordi
Publications and source records attributed to Casoliva, Jordi.
Assessment of M2020 Terrain Relative Landing Accuracy: Flight Performance vs Predicts
No abstract provided
Chen, Allen↗
Reconstructed Flight Performance of the Powered Descent Guidance and Control System for the Mars 2020 Perseverance Mission
On February 18th, 2021, the Mars 2020 mission successfully landed the “Perseverance” rover at Jezero crater on Mars. The Powered Descent Guidance and Control (PDGC) system was inherited from the Mars Science Laboratory mission and its parameters were tuned to support Terrain Relative Navigation for the Mars 2020 mission. The PDGC system architecture consists of a trajectory and an attitude commander, six feedback control loops and thruster allocation logic. The PDGC commands eight throttleable Mars Lander Engines to actively guide and control the vehicle during each powered flight phase. This paper describes the design and the as-flown performance of the PDGC system.
Way, David W.↗
Mars 2020 Perseverance Edl Gnc Safe Target Selection Reconstruction
On February 18th, 2021, NASA landed Perseverance on the Jezero crater (on Mars) using a new Terrain Relative Navigation (TRN) capability. TRN is com-prised of a new sensor, the Lander Vision System (LVS), and a new GNC algo-rithm, the Safe Target Selection (STS). LVS localized the descent vehicle with respect to a map. STS selected the safe landing target within a reachable region from the on-board Safe Targets Map (STM). The landing target was then handed to the Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) heritage powered descent GNC system to execute the landing. This paper describes the design and the as-flown performance of the STS algorithm.
Dutta, Soumyo↗
The Mars 2020 Perseverance Navigation Filter
The Mars 2020 (M2020) Entry Descent and Landing (EDL) system delivered a rover named “Perseverance” at Jezero crater (Mars) on February 18th, 2021. M2020 EDL used a Guidance Navigation and Control (GN&C) system to achieve its landing target objectives. The navigation filter (NavFilter) integrated Descent Inertial Measurement Unit (DIMU) measurements to estimate position and attitude. The NavFilter also used the Terminal Descent Sensor (TDS) to es-timate surface-relative position and velocity corrections. The NavFilter provided all of the dynamic state information to the entry controller, entry guidance, Lander Vision System (LVS) and powered descent guidance and control algo-rithms. The NavFilter for Perseverance is based on Curiosity’s NavFilter with a couple of modifications.
Casoliva, Jordi↗
Assessment of M2020 Terrain Relative Landing Accuracy: Flight Performance vs Predicts
Terrain Relative Navigation (TRN) was a critical enabling Entry, Descent, and Landing (EDL) technology that enabled Mars 2020 mission Perseverance rover to land at Jezero crater. TRN pro-vides real-time, autonomous, map-relative position determination and generates a landing target based on a priori knowledge of hazards. The required performance for TRN was to land within 60m of the selected target. The required 60m was sub-allocated to various error sources in three major categories: targeting error, knowledge error, and control error. The targeting error is the error in selecting an appropriate landing target and the knowledge of the target on the surface. It includes the Lander Vision System (LVS) position localization with respect the ground, the synchronization between the Lander Vision System measurement and the main Navigation filter, and errors associated with the LVS Reference Map and Safe Target Selec-tion (STS). The knowledge error is the contribution of knowledge growth from the synchronization with LVS to touchdown. The control error encompasses how accurately the system could stay on the desired reference trajectory. The TRN error budget uses a combination of analysis, simulation, and hardware test-ing results to bound the various error contributions obtained during the verification and validation process. This paper first presents a description the TRN system, focusing on the architecture of LVS and STS. The paper then gives detailed overview of the TRN error budget, with a description of the major error contribu-tions in each of the three categories. Next, the paper gives the results for three versions of the error budget, pre-launch, in-flight pre-landing, and post-landing. The paper compares the pre-flight analysis, the pre-landing analysis using in-flight data during cruise, to the post-landing analysis of the TRN performance. Pre-landing analysis best estimate of the landing performance was 33m, compared to the 60m require-ment. Post-landing analysis estimated a landing accuracy of 8.53m or better, much better than the 33m pre-landing estimate. The actual post-landing imagery calculated the distance of the rover to the targeted location to be 5m. The post-landing analysis closely bounds the image-based assessment of landing accu-racy, indicating the success of the error budget architecture in bounding the landing accuracy, as well as the fidelity of the simulations used to model and predict performance.
Chen, Allen↗
Mars Science Laboratory Entry Descent and Landing Simulation Using DSENDS
The most recent planetary science mission to Mars is Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) with the Curiosity rover, launched November 26, 2011 and landed at Gale Crater on August 6, 2012. This spacecraft was the first use at Mars of a complete closed-loop Guidance Navigation and Control (GN&C) system, including guided entry with a lifting body that greatly reduces dispersions during the Entry, Descent and Landing (EDL) phase to achieve a 25 km x 20 km landing error relative to the selected Gale Crater landing target. In order to confirm meeting the above landing criteria, high-fidelity simulation of the EDL phase is required. The tool used for 6DOF EDL trajectory verification analysis is Dynamics Simulator for Entry, Descent and Surface landing (DSENDS), which is a high-fidelity simulation tool from JPLs Dynamics and Real-Time Simulation Laboratory for the development, test and operations of aero-flight vehicles. DSENDS inherent capability is augmented for MSL with project-specific models of atmosphere, aerodynamics, sensors and thrusters along with GN&C flight software to enable high-fidelity trajectory simulation. This paper will present the model integration and independent verification experience of the JPL EDL trajectory analysis team.
Mars↗
Mars Science Laboratory Entry Descent and Landing Simulation Using DSENDS
The most recent planetary science mission to Mars was Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) with the Curiosity rover, launched November 26, 2011 and landed at Gale Crater on August 6, 2012. This spacecraft was the first use at Mars of a complete closed-loop Guidance Navigation and Control (GN&C) system, including guided entry with a lifting body that greatly reduces dispersions during the Entry, Descent and Landing (EDL) phase to achieve a 25 km X 20 km landing error relative to the selected Gale Crater landing target. In order to confirm meeting the above landing criteria, high-fidelity simulation of the EDL phase is required. The tool used for 6DOF EDL trajectory verification analysis is Dynamics Simulator for Entry, Descent and Surface landing (DSENDS), which is a high-fidelity simulation tool from JPLs Dynamics and Real-Time Simulation Laboratory for the development, test and operations of aero-flight vehicles. DSENDS inherent capability is augmented for MSL with project-specific models of atmosphere, aerodynamics, sensors and thrusters along with GN&C flight software to enable high-fidelity trajectory simulation. This paper will present the model integration and independent verification experience of the JPL EDL trajectory analysis team.
Burkhart, P. Daniel↗
Mars Science Laboratory Entry Descent and Landing Simulation Using DSENDS
No abstract available
parachute↗
MSL DSENDS EDL Analysis and Operations
This paper presents the operations experience of the JPL EDL (Entry, Descent, and Landing) trajectory simulation team, focusing on events in the week before landing and EDL itself. A brief description of the EDL trajectory simulation tool used for targeting and simulation verification analysis will be presented, including a high level discussion of the required modeling. Initialization and output interfaces used for landing hazard analysis will also be covered, along with discussion of real-time EDL event detection using radiometric Doppler data.
Entry, descent, and landing (EDL)↗
Improving the Landing Precision of an MSL-class Vehicle
No abstract available
21.5-m diameter disk / gap / band parachute↗
Entry, Descent and Landing Systems Analysis Study: Phase 1 Report
NASA senior management commissioned the Entry, Descent and Landing Systems Analysis (EDL-SA) Study in 2008 to identify and roadmap the Entry, Descent and Landing (EDL) technology investments that the agency needed to make in order to successfully land large payloads at Mars for both robotic and human-scale missions. This paper summarizes the motivation, approach and top-level results from Year 1 of the study, which focused on landing 10-50 mt on Mars, but also included a trade study of the best advanced parachute design for increasing the landed payloads within the EDL architecture of the Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) mission
DwyerCianciolo, Alicia M.↗