Engineering topics

Cenko, A.

Publications and source records attributed to Cenko, A..

3 records

NASA NTRS1993

TranAir applications to predicting transonic aircraft/store loads

During a recent AIWS wind tunnel test for the F-18, the AIWS grid loads were in substantial disagreement with carriage loads measured on the opposite pylon at M = 0.95. Carriage loads indicated that the AIWS configuration might impact the fuel tank mounted on the inboard pylon during jettison at M = 0.95, while CTS data indicated this to be a safe jettison condition. An attempt was made to determine the correct loads for this condition. On the basis of PAN AIR and TranAir calculations, it appears that the carriage loads are correct, while the CTS measured grid data may be subject to sting-fuel tank interference effects at transonic speeds.

Cenko, A.↗

NASA NTRS1991

Potential flow applications to complex configurations

Recent advances in CFD methods have enabled the analytic calculation of the carriage loads for stores mounted on complex aircraft. The latest results have demonstrated excellent agreement with test data for the F-15 at M = 0.98. However, in a preliminary design environment, the necessity of generating and validating a Euler grid to fit the aircraft and store arrangement may not be feasible, particularly when effects of configuration changes are considered. For that reason alternative approaches which require less time to arrive at an answer deserve consideration. The paper presents the results of a study to determine if potential flow solutions can give acceptable estimates of store carriage loads at transonic speeds in a timely manner.

Cenko, A.↗

NASA NTRS1991

TranAir applications to transonic flowfield predictions

Reliable methods for predicting external aircraft flowfields are required for airframe/engine and aircraft/store integrations, as well as for predicting store trajectories. Although Euler methods have demonstrated an impressive capability for predicting aircraft flowfields at all speed regimes, the need to generate a separate grid for any new or modified configuration make these methods impractical to use in a preliminary design environment. The PAN AIR and Nielsen programs are considerably easier to use, but are limited to the linear speed regime. The TranAir program uses PAN AIR type geometry inputs and works well in the transonic speed regime. It might be the technique of choice for predicting transonic aircraft flowfields. A study was made of the relative merits of Nielsen, PAN AIR and TranAir for predicting the transonic flowfield about the F-18 aircraft.

Cenko, A.↗