Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Charles M Werneth

Publications and source records attributed to Charles M Werneth.

14 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2019

Advances in Space Radiation Physics and Transport

The space radiation environment is a complex mixture of particle types and energies originating from sources inside and outside of the galaxy. These environments may be modified by the heliospheric and geomagnetic conditions as well as planetary bodies and vehicle or habitat mass shielding. In low Earth orbit (LEO), the geomagnetic field deflects a portion of the galactic cosmic rays (GCR) and all but the most intense solar particle events (SPE). There are also dynamic belts of trapped electrons and protons with low to medium energy and intense particle count rates. In deep space, the GCR exposure is more severe than in LEO and varies inversely with solar activity. Unpredictable solar storms also present an acute risk to astronauts if adequate shielding is not provided. Near planetary surfaces such as the Earth, moon or Mars, secondary particles are produced when the ambient deep space radiation environment interacts with these surfaces and/or atmospheres. These secondary particles further complicate the local radiation environment and modify the associated health risks. Characterizing the radiation fields in this vast array of scenarios and environments is a challenging task and is currently accomplished with a combination of computational models and dosimetry. The computational tools include models for the ambient space radiation environment, mass shielding geometry, and atomic and nuclear interaction parameters. These models are then coupled to a radiation transport code to describe the radiation field at the location of interest within a vehicle or habitat. Many new advances in these models have been made in the last decade, and the present review article focuses on the progress and contributions made by workers and collaborators at NASA in the same time frame. Although great progress has been made, and models continue to improve, significant gaps remain and are discussed in the context of planned future missions. Of particular interest is the juxtaposition of various review committee findings regarding the accuracy and gaps of combined space radiation environment, physics, and transport models with the progress achieved over the past decade. While current models are now fully capable of characterizing radiation environments in the broad range of forecasted mission scenarios, it should be remembered that uncertainties still remain and need to be addressed.

Space radiation↗
NASA NTRS2017

SHIELD and HZETRN Comparisons of Pion Production Cross Sections

A program of comparing American (NASA) and Russian (ROSCOSMOS) space radiation transport codes has recently begun, and the rst paper directly comparing the NASA and ROSCOSMOS space radiation transport codes, HZETRN and SHIELD respectively has recently appeared. The present work represents the second time that NASA and ROSCOSMOS calculations have been directly compared, and the focus here is on models of pion production cross sections used in the two transport codes mentioned above. It was found that these models are in overall moderate agreement with each other and with experimental data. Disagreements that were found are discussed.

John W Norbury↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Medical Countermeasure Requirements for Meeting Permissible Radiation Exposure Limits in Space

The space radiation environment consists of ionizing radiation that poses healthrisks to crew members who embark on a mission to Mars. NASA requiresthat astronaut career radiation limits for the Risk of Exposure Induced Death(REID) should not exceed 3% at the upper 95% confidence level for cancermortality. However, the lifetime career limit is likely to be exceeded for eventhe shortest round-trip mission scenario to Mars. As such, approaches fordirectly reducing the radiation risk, despite the large uncertainties, are beinginvestigated. A recent study showed that medical countermeasures (MCM)which reduced background cancer mortality rates may be effective in mitigatingthe REID, where the data employed in the sensitivity analysis were limited tocohort studies of aspirin and warfarin. The present work addresses the generalMCM requirements that are needed to meet the lifetime career exposure limitsby examining modifications to the background cancer mortality rates, radiationquality factor, and low-LET radiation risk models for a Mars mission scenario.These results may be used to help inform decision-makers about potentialexperimental measurements that facilitate the greatest propensity for MCM risk reduction.

Charles M Werneth↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Utility of Terrestrial Cardiovascular Disease Data in Astronaut Radiation Risk Assessment – A Case Study Showing Increased Risk with Clonal Hematopoiesis of Indeterminate Potential

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is associated with high doses of radiation and is are cognized health risk for astronauts on multiple or long duration exploration missions to the Moon or Mars. Currently, radiation risk assessment is based on background population disease rates and does not consider individual risk factors that may modify analysis, especially at lower radiation doses.

Zarana S Patel↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

A NASA Flight Surgeon Survey for Space Radiation Risk Communication

NASA has recently completed an uncrewed mission to lunar orbit with the Artemis I mission and continues to plan future crewed missions to the lunar surface and beyond. Astronauts are exposed to various spaceflight hazards including space radiation, which comprises a complex mixture of high linear-energy-transfer (LET) particles that differ appreciably from typical terrestrial exposures. As NASA embarks on missions beyond low-earth-orbit, crew members are expected to accumulate greater exposures than have been measured previously. Consequently, tools that effectively communicate space radiation health risks are important for mission planning. In addition to other spaceflight hazards, NASA flight surgeons are tasked with communicating space radiation risks to crew members for flight certification and informed consent of spaceflight hazards. In keeping with recommendations of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine1 (NASEM), NASA is engaged in improving its risk communication tools. In an effort to improve these tools, this presentation provides NASA flight surgeon responses to a survey that solicits information about the primary concerns of space radiation health risks and best approaches for risk communication.

Rania W Ghatas↗