Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Chopra, A.

Publications and source records attributed to Chopra, A..

Oceanus: A High Science Return Uranus Orbiter with a Low-Cost Instrument Suite

Ice-giant-sized planets are the most common type of observed exoplanet, yet the two ice giants in our own solar system (Uranus and Neptune) are the least explored class of planet, having only been observed through ground-based observations and a single flyby each by Voyager 2 approximately 30 years ago. These single flybys were unable to characterize the spatial and temporal variability in ice giant magnetospheres, some of the most odd and intriguing magnetospheres in the solar system. They also offered only limited constraints on the internal structure of ice giants; understanding the internal structure of a planet is important for understanding its formation and evolution. The most recent planetary science Decadal Survey by the U.S. National Academy of Sciences, ''Vision and Voyages for Planetary Science in the Decade 2013-2022,'' identified the ice giant Uranus as the third highest priority for a Flagship mission in the decade 2013-2022. However, in the event that NASA or another space agency is unable to fly a Flagship-class mission to an ice giant in the next decade, this paper presents a mission concept for a focused, lower cost Uranus orbiter called OCEANUS (Origins and Composition of the Exoplanet Analog Uranus System). OCEANUS would increase our understanding of the interior structure of Uranus, its magnetosphere, and how its magnetic field is generated. These goals could be achieved with just a magnetometer and the spacecraft's radio system. This study shows that several of the objectives outlined by the Decadal Survey, including one of the two identified as highest priority, are within reach for a New-Frontiers-class mission.

Elder, C. M.↗

The 30-kW ammonia arcjet technology

The technical results are summarized of a 30 kW class ammonia propellant arcjet technology program. Evaluation of previous arcjet thruster performance, including materials analysis of used thruster components, led to the design of an arcjet with improved performance and thermal characteristics. Tests of the new engine demonstrated that engine performance is relatively insensitive to cathode tip geometry. Other data suggested a maximum sustainable arc length for a given thruster configuration, beyond which the arc may reconfigure in a destructive manner. A flow controller calibration error was identified. This error caused previously reported values of specific impulse and thrust efficiency to be 20 percent higher than the real values. Corrected arcjet performance data are given. Duration tests of 413 and 252 hours, and several tests 100 hours in duration, were performed. The cathode tip erosion rate increased with increasing arc current. Elimination of power source ripple did not affect cathode tip whisker growth. Results of arcjet modeling, diagnostic development and mission analyses are also discussed. The 30 kW ammonia arcjet may now be considered ready for development for a flight demonstration, but widespread application of 30 kW class arcjet will require improved efficiency and lifetime.

Deininger, W. D.↗

Effect of cathode configuration on 30 kWe arcjet electrical characteristics

This paper compares the electrical characteristics of a 30 kWe arcjet for four cathode tip geometries. The electrical behavior of various cathode configurations is characterized by examining engine operation over a range of power levels (20 kWe - 30 kWe), current levels (200 A - 300 A) and geometric arc lengths (0.85 cm - 1.81 cm). Preliminary results indicate that tip geometry does not affect arc current or engine power when plotted as a function of geometric arc length, that at a fixed power the current level can be expected to drop as the arc grows in length due to erosion, and that any long duration test will require adjustment of the power source to maintain a constant power level.

Chopra, A.↗

Cathode erosion tests for 30 kW arcjets

Endurance tests (100 hours) were conducted to examine the effects of geometry and spacing on 30 kW arcjet cathode erosion. The effects of input power source ripple were also examined. The preliminary results from a 413 hour endurance test are also discussed. This test was terminated voluntarily. The condition of the nozzle, boron nitride propellant injector, and cathode are discussed. A modeling effort is described which is aimed at quantifying the cathode tip heating phenomena. The results of the experiments and the model are compared.

Deininger, W. D.↗

Thermal design improvements for 30kWe arcjet engine

Two thermal design improvements for 30 kWe arcjet engines are described. A ZrB2 high temperature coating was used to increase the surface emissivity of the nozzle radiating surface, enabling lower temperature operation, which should lead to longer nozzle life. The ZrB2-coated engine operated 120 C cooler than the uncoated baseline engine indicating a 30 percent increase in the surface emissivity. An engine design which has fewer active seals than previous designs and operates at lower overall component temperatures is described. The nozzle on the engine operated at 1950 C at 30 kWe while the baseline engine nozzle reached 2000 C at 23 kWe. The back of the engine was more than a factor of two cooler when compared to the baseline engine.

Deininger, William D.↗

Thermal design improvements for 30kWe arcjet engines

This paper describes two thermal design improvements for 30 kWe arcjet engines. A ZrB2 high temperature coating was used to increase the surface emissivity of the nozzle radiating surface, enabling lower temperature operation, which should lead to longer nozzle life. The ZrB2-coated engine operated about 120 C cooler than the uncoated baseline engine indicating a 30 percent increase in the surface emissivity. Additionally, a new engine design which has fewer active seals than previous designs and operates at lower overall component temperatures is described in detail. The nozzle on the new engine operated at a temperature of 1950 C at 30 kWe while the baseline engine nozzle reached 2000 C at 23 kWe. In addition, the back of the new engine was more than a factor of two cooler when compared to the baseline engine.

Deininger, W. D.↗