Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Chris Ostrom

Publications and source records attributed to Chris Ostrom.

Developing a Pyrolysis Gas Thermal Blocking Model for Reentry Demise

In NASA’s Object Reentry Survival Analysis Tool (ORSAT), aerodynamic drag and aerothermal heating coefficients are computed for each of the free-molecular, continuum, and transitional flow regimes using analytical and semi-analytical methods. These heating coefficients were derived for typical metallic materials that melt and do not have a strong gas-phase contribution to the flow in the boundary layer. Modern satellites typically feature fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) components, such as solar array booms, facesheets of sandwich panels, or overwraps for composite-overwrapped pressure vessels (COPV). These FRP materials do not behave the same as metals in the reentry environment, but instead will pyrolyze and develop significant volumes of gas into the boundary layer. Accurately predicting the reentry demise of FRP components is critical to assessing the reentry casualty risk for modern spacecraft. Research in recent years has shown that this demisability can depend heavily on how the expulsion of gaseous pyrolysis products through the outer surface of the material affects the heat flux at the surface. The ODPO has been developing a reduced-order model of the effect of pyrolysis gas blowing on the heat flux based on correlations between a blowing factor and a non-dimensional heat flux to be incorporated in the upcoming version 7.3 of the Object Reentry Survivability Analysis Tool (ORSAT). This presentation discusses the progress of this development project and the challenges remaining for generalizing the model across families of FRP materials.

Benton Greene↗

The NASA Orbital Debris Program Office - In Service of Space Safety

Since the NASA Orbital Debris Program Office’s (ODPO) founding in 1979 at the Johnson Space Center in Houston, Texas, it has been at the forefront of orbital debris research, modeling, and policy development. The ODPO has worked in collaboration with NASA and other U.S. government missions since the 1980s to mitigate the growth of the orbital debris environment and protect the population of the Earth. Two main products from the ODPO, the Orbital Debris Engineering Model (ORDEM) and the Debris Assessment Software (DAS), are frequently among the top three most-downloaded software packages from the NASA Software Catalog. These products are provided free of charge to the public in furtherance of the goal to ensure that new space missions, in compliance with NASA’s orbital debris mitigation requirements, are developed, operated, and disposed of responsibly. In addition to these external-facing software tools, the ODPO maintains high-fidelity internal tools for reentry simulation (the Object Reentry Survival Analysis Tool, ORSAT), short-term risk assessment for robotic and human spaceflight missions (the Satellite Breakup Risk Assessment Module, SBRAM), among others. Using data from the ORDEM model, as well as using the Meteoroid Environment Model (MEM) developed by the Meteoroid Environment Office (MEO) at NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center, the Hypervelocity Impact Technology (HVIT) team uses the BUMPER code to assess penetration risk to space vehicles in Earth orbit and beyond. This paper will discuss the services that the ODPO and HVIT provide, from mission concept development through end-of-mission, for NASA-related and commercial missions.

Chris Ostrom↗

Validating Drag and Heating Coefficients for Hollow Reentry Objects in Continuum Flow Using a Mach 7 Ludwieg Tube

Drag and heating coefficient databases and models are crucial to destructive reentry simulation. The NASA Orbital Debris Program Office (ODPO) develops, maintains, and performs analysis with the Object Reentry Survival Analysis Tool (ORSAT), which comprises drag and heating models for free molecular, transitional, and continuum flow regimes. These models have, in the past, only included solid, convex, blunt shapes (such as boxes, spheres, and cylinders). Previous work led by ODPO includes the extension of these models to hollow cylinders and square boxes in free molecular and transitional flow using the Direct Simulation Monte Carlo (DSMC) method. Since 2019, the ODPO has continued its program of DSMC simulations and extended the project to include analyses with the NASA Data Parallel Line Relaxation (DPLR) program on hollow cylinders and boxes (with varying wall thickness-diameter ratio). In fall 2022, the ODPO began a collaboration with the University of Texas San Antonio (UTSA) to use the Mach 7 Ludwieg Tube facility to validate the model built using numerical simulations. This facility can replicate (at a scale of approximately 100:1) the conditions seen by reentering objects near typical demise altitudes. We present here the drag and heating coefficients derived from the continued DSMC simulations, the new DPLR simulations, and the 26-test series at UTSA.

Chris Ostrom↗

Revisiting the Effectiveness of Debris Mitigation by Back-Dating Fragmentation Events

Since 1961, more than 250 satellites have fragmented while in orbit about the Earth, from very low Earth orbit out to the geostationary belt. The problem of orbital debris has been recognized since at least the late 1970s, with the institution of the NASA Orbital Debris Program Office (ODPO) in 1979 at the Johnson Space Center. Efforts to mitigate the growth of the orbital debris environment have mainly focused in two areas: the reduction and elimination of accidental explosions of spacecraft and rocket upper stages and the timely removal of spacecraft and rocket upper stages from orbit after completion of their missions. The ODPO continues to analyze the orbital population in orbit based on object type, mass, and other parameters of interest for characterizing the overall growth of objects in Earth’s orbit. Of the 268 known fragmentation events, 46 have occurred more than ten years after the affected satellites’ launch. These long-delayed breakups increase the population of orbital debris on the date of fragmentation, but we can also consider that the debris generated during that event could be attributed to the launch date of that satellite. We will present here an analysis of the historical growth of the low-Earth orbit debris environment, removing intentional fragmentation events, and examine the effectiveness of mitigation measures (such as passivation and reducing post-mission orbital lifetime).

Chris Ostrom↗

Observations of Small Debris from the Cosmos 1408 Anti-Satellite Test using the HUSIR and Goldstone Radars

On 15 November 2021, Russia conducted a direct-ascent, anti-satellite (ASAT) test against its Cosmos 1408 satellite, which had been in orbit since 1982. The test produced at least 1500 fragments trackable by the U.S. Space Surveillance Network (SSN). This is a significant event because the resulting cloud has the potential to endanger the International Space Station and other satellites in low Earth orbit (LEO).For almost 30 years, the NASA Orbital Debris Program Office (ODPO) has been using the Haystack Ultrawideband Imaging Radar (HUSIR), located in Tyngsborough, Massachusetts and operated by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s Lincoln Laboratory, to perform statistical measurements of debris in LEO too small to be tracked by the SSN, nominally down to 5.5 mm at 1000 km altitude. The ODPO also utilizes the Goldstone Orbital Debris Radar (Goldstone), located near Barstow, California and operated by the NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, to characterize the small debris environment in LEO down to approximately 3 mm at 1000 km altitude. To characterize the small debris component of the Cosmos 1408 ASAT test, a series of observation campaigns were conducted with the HUSIR and Goldstone radars. This paper discusses the observation planning, including beam overlap analysis required for the Goldstone’s bistatic operation, using a model of the debris cloud produced using the NASA Standard Satellite Breakup Model. A description of the radars and the data processing techniques used to analyze the data are also discussed. Finally, results of the measurement campaigns including cumulative flux versus size, altitude, and inclination are presented.

James Murray↗

Characterizing Char Rate and Extent in Fiber-Reinforced Plastics Using X-ray Computed Tomography

Orbital debris is a growing problem for the space industry and the world in general, and an important component of the problem is what happens when that debris reenters the Earth’s atmosphere. With more spacecraft opting for fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) components, we need to understand the thermal destruction process of these materials during an atmospheric reentry and how much of the material can survive to impact the ground. The NASA Orbital Debris Program Office (ODPO) has developed a new charring model for FRP components to be integrated into the latest version of the Object Reentry Survival Analysis Tool (ORSAT). To validate this new model, the ODPO performed several test series using the Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) Torch facility at UT Austin. To measure the extent of charred material at different conditions, some of the test samples were scanned using x-ray computed tomography (CT) by the Astromaterials Curation Lab at Johnson Space Center. 3D image analysis was then used to calculate the volume and density of the char in each test sample. This paper presents the image analysis methodology, an assessment of the accuracy of the data analysis, and a comparison with calculations using the ORSAT charring model.

Benton Greene↗

Observations of Small Debris from the Cosmos 1408 Anti-Satellite Test using the HUSIR and Goldstone Radars

On 15 November 2021, Russia conducted a direct-ascent anti-satellite (ASAT) test against its Cosmos 1408 satellite, which had been in orbit since 1982. The test produced at least 1500 fragments trackable by the U.S. Space Surveillance Network (SSN). The test is a significant event because the resulting cloud has the potential to endanger the International Space Station and other satellites in low Earth orbit (LEO). For almost 30 years, the NASA Orbital Debris Program Office (ODPO) has used the Haystack Ultrawideband Satellite Imaging Radar (HUSIR), operated by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s Lincoln Laboratory to perform statistical measurements of debris in LEO too small to be tracked by the SSN, nominally down to 5.5 mm at 1000 km altitude. The ODPO also utilizes the Goldstone Orbital Debris Radar (Goldstone), operated by NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, to characterize the small debris environment in LEO down to approximately 3 mm at 1000 km altitude. To characterize the small debris component of the Cosmos 1408 ASAT test, a series of observation campaigns were conducted with the HUSIR and Goldstone radars. This paper discusses the observation planning, including beam overlap analysis needed for Goldstone bistatic operation, using a model of the debris cloud produced with the NASA Standard Satellite Breakup Model. A description of the radars and the data processing techniques used to analyze the data are also discussed. Finally, results of the measurement campaigns including cumulative count rate versus size and surface area flux versus altitude and inclination are presented

James Murray↗

Validating Drag and Heating Coefficients for Hollow Reentry Objects in Continuum Flow Using a Mach 7 Ludwieg Tube

Drag and heating coefficient databases and models are crucial to destructive reentry simulation. The NASA Orbital Debris Program Office (ODPO) develops, maintains, and performs analysis with the Object Reentry Survival Analysis Tool (ORSAT), which comprises drag and heating models for free molecular, transitional, and continuum flow regimes. These models have, in the past, only included solid, convex, blunt shapes (such as boxes, spheres, and cylinders). Previous work led by ODPO includes the extension of these models to hollow cylinders and square boxes in free molecular and transitional flow using the Direct Simulation Monte Carlo (DSMC) method. Since 2019, the ODPO has continued its program of DSMC simulations and extended the project to include analyses with the NASA Data Parallel Line Relaxation (DPLR) program on hollow cylinders and boxes (with varying wall thickness-diameter ratio). In fall 2022, the ODPO began a collaboration with the University of Texas San Antonio (UTSA) to use the Mach 7 Ludwieg Tube facility to validate the model built using numerical simulations. This facility can replicate (at a scale of approximately 100:1) the conditions seen by reentering objects near typical demise altitudes. We present here the drag and heating coefficients derived from the continued DSMC simulations, the new DPLR simulations, and the 26-test series at UTSA.

Chris Ostrom↗

Revisiting the Effectiveness of Debris Mitigation by Back-Dating Fragmentation Event

Since 1961, more than 250 satellites have fragmented while in orbit about the Earth, from very low Earth orbit out to the geostationary belt. The problem of orbital debris has been recognized since at least the late 1970s, with the institution of the NASA Orbital Debris Program Office (ODPO) in 1979 at the Johnson Space Center. Efforts to mitigate the growth of the orbital debris environment have mainly focused in two areas: the reduction and elimination of accidental explosions of spacecraft and rocket upper stages and the timely removal of spacecraft and rocket upper stages from orbit after completion of their missions. The ODPO continues to analyze the orbital population in orbit based on object type, mass, and other parameters of interest for characterizing the overall growth of objects in Earth’s orbit. Of the 268 known fragmentation events, 46 have occurred more than ten years after the affected satellites’ launch. These long-delayed breakups increase the population of orbital debris on the date of fragmentation, but we can also consider that the debris generated during that event could be attributed to the launch date of that satellite. We will present here an analysis of the historical growth of the low-Earth orbit debris environment, removing intentional fragmentation events, and examine the effectiveness of mitigation measures (such as passivation and reducing post-mission orbital lifetime).

Chris Ostrom↗

Battery Passivation – What NASA needs you to know

This presentation provides information on battery passivation of spacecraft at the end of mission (EOM) life. The goal of battery passivation is to tackle the growing problem of orbital debris and its impact on space sustainability. NASA is increasingly using commercially produced buses in NASA missions, and this presentation provides information on EOM spacecraft passivation for NASA missions.

battery passivation↗