Engineering topics

Christopher E. Porter

Publications and source records attributed to Christopher E. Porter.

6 records

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Integrated Icing Analysis of the D8 "Double Bubble" and the Hybrid Wing Body

A computational icing analysis utilizing LEWICE3D was performed for two next generational aircraft, the D8 “Double Bubble” and the Hybrid Wing Body (HWB). These two geometries were exposed to a variety of simulated clouds spanning the Appendix C and O regimes. Integrated results indicate that the Appendix O clouds generate a significantly higher water catch rate than Appendix C clouds as large radius of curvature components are susceptible to the highly ballistic large droplets found in Appendix O. Classically unprotected components, such as the nose/fuselage, may require anti-icing protection in configurations such as the D8 and HWB that generate lift from these components, dramatically increasing the size, extent, and power requirements of ice protection systems. Integrated results also indicate inclusion of the splashing model can significantly affect predicted water catch rates.

Computational,Icing,Integrated↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Characterization of Collection Efficiency of the Common Research Model Midspan Wing Section in the IRT

This paper presents a preliminary study for the characterization of collection efficiency from icing tests conducted in the Icing Research Tunnel at NASA Glenn Research Center. A test method previously developed for measuring the attachment line maximum collection efficiency of a swept NACA 0012 airfoil model at zero angle of attack was applied to the leading-edge region of a 65%-scale version of the Common Research Model midspan wing section. A correlation for the stagnation line maximum collection efficiency as a function of the modified inertia parameter was obtained with LEWICE3D simulations utilizing a discrete number of drop diameters. It was then compared with the collection efficiency measurement data obtained in the IRT. For the experimental collection efficiency, two ice shape digitization procedures were utilized to extract 2-D chord-wise ice shape profiles, i.e., the Maximum Combined Cross Section or MCCS, and the Minimum Combined Cross Section or MinCCS, at selected span-wise locations from the 3-D scanned ice shapes. The preliminary result showed that the rime ice thickness method can be used to characterize the collection efficiency distribution, for conditions free of ice erosion, in the main ice shape region. However, a high-order statistical processing of the ice scan is needed for estimating the mean ice thickness in areas where feathers are prevalent. From the limited comparison of the experimental and LEWICE3D collection efficiency data in the CRM65 MS model leading edge area, it was shown that the attachment line maximum collection efficiency is reasonably estimated by the best curve-fit correlation in the range of modified inertia parameter tested. A tighter alignment control of the iced and cold clean model scans as well as the model angle of attack are needed to improve the comparison. Further evaluation of this correlation is recommended to assess its applicability for Common Research Model type swept wing icing scaling analysis.

Icing Scaling↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Scalability of GlennICE in a Parallel Environment

The Glenn Icing Computational Environment (GlennICE) is a computational tool designed to calculate ice growth on complex three-dimensional geometries using the input from a user-supplied computational fluid dynamics (CFD) solution for the geometry of interest. The most significant developments in the advancement of GlennICE have been investigating the convergence of the collection efficiency, efficiently finding trajectories, and improving the refinement methodology. Such developments have increased the efficiency of GlennICE for practical engineering application. With the increasing demand for applying GlennICE for more memory-intensive problems, the scalability of GlennICE has yet to be investigated. This paper is aimed at presenting a method to benchmark the scalability of GlennICE utilizing a relevant engineering problem within a parallel environment. This leads to the final goal of investigating whether an increase in the number of processors utilized results in a linear speedup of the GlennICE software.

Computational Icing, Icing, CFD, MPI↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Scalability of GlennICE in a Parallel Environment

GlennICE (Glenn Icing Computational Environment) is a comptational tool designed to calculate ice growth on complex three- dimensional geometries using the input from a user-supplied computational fluid dynamics (CFD) solution for the geometry of interest. The most significant developments in the advancement of GlennICE have been investigating the convergence of the collection efficiency, efficiently finding trajectories, and improving the refinement methodology. Such developments have increased the efficiency of GlennICE for tractability in a practical engineering application. Although studies have demonstrated a reduction in the amount of work (memory footprint) required, research has yet to systematically investigate the effects of scaling GlennICE. This paper sets out to benchmark the scalability of GlennICE within a parallel environment and investigate if an increase in the number of processors result in a linear speed up.

Computational Icing↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

A Study of Parallel Scalability and Dynamic Workload Balancing in GlennICE

The Glenn Icing Computational Environment (GlennICE) is a computational tool designed to calculate ice growth on complex three-dimensional geometries. It utilizes user-supplied computational fluid dynamics solutions for the geometry of interest. Key developments include advancements in convergence of collection efficiency, trajectory optimization, and refinement methodology. These improvements have significantly enhanced GlennICE’s efficiency for practical engineering applications. A recent study focused on benchmarking GlennICE’s scalability in a parallel environment using static scheduling. Findings indicated a potential twofold increase in efficiency through workload balance enhancements. This paper presents an analysis of the solver’s new workload balancing improvements, incorporating shared memory and dynamic scheduling routines. Results demonstrate a highly efficient and consistent algorithm across high-performance computing clusters.

Computational Icing↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Utilization of Streamtubes to Analyze the Physical Interaction of a Dispersed Cloud with the CRM65 Hybrid Midspan Model

Recently there have been numerous efforts to identify the relevant icing physics related to the formation of complex three dimensional features, sometimes referred to as ’scallops’, on swept wings. However, much of the physics is still not well understood. This paper computationally investigates the interaction of the icing cloud with the 65 percent Common Research Model (CRM65). Both the interaction with an uniced model, and the interaction with a representative simulated three dimensional ice accretion are analyzed. Preliminary results suggest that the liquid water content increases near the aerodynamic body. For small droplets on the uniced geometry, the particle velocity vector becomes nearly parallel with the aerodynamic model resulting in a low value of collection efficiency. When a three dimensional feature with a length scale much smaller than the leading edge of the airfoil is introduced into the flow, the impingement of small particles can become significantly more perpendicular to the particle velocity vector in the region of these features. Since the liquid water content near the body has increased due to the interaction with the larger scale features of the aerodynamic model, i.e. the leading edge of the swept wing, extremely high collection efficiency is observed. These results suggest that three dimensional features are likely a significant physical driver that should be modeled in some capacity when simulating the impingement of a cloud on an aerodynamic model.

Icing↗