Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Cisowski, S. M.

Publications and source records attributed to Cisowski, S. M..

The relict magnetism of meteorites

Meteorite paleomagnetic studies are reviewed and evaluated. Possible mechanisms for producing early solar system magnetic fields that could have been responsible for the magnetization of some or all meteorite classes are explored. A detailed review of paleointensity results derived from the various classes of meteorites is given, and the likelihood that the results might related to solar or nebulawide magnetic fields is considered. The implications of meteorite magnetism for early solar system evolution are discussed.

Cisowski, S. M.↗

Magnetic studies on Shergotty and other SNC meteorites

The results of a study of basic magnetic properties of meteorites within the SNC group, including the four known shergottites and two nakhlites, are presented. An estimate is made of the strength of the magnetic field which produced the remanent magnetization of the Shergotty meteorite, for the purpose of constraining the choices for the parent body of these SNC meteorites. Remanence measurements in several subsamples of Shergotty and Zagami meteorites reveal a large variation in intensity that does not seem to be related to the abundance of remanence carriers. The other meteorites carry only weak remanence, suggesting weak magnetizing fields as the source of their magnetic signal. A paleointensity experiment on a weakly magnetized subsample of Shergotty revealed a low temperature component of magnetization acquired in a field of 2000 gammas, and a high temperature component reflecting a paleofield strength of between 250 and 1000 gammas. The weak field environment that these meteorites seem to reflect is consistent with either a Martian or asteroidal origin, but inconsistent with a terrestrial origin.

Cisowski, S. M.↗

Lunar paleointensities via the IRMs normalization method and the early magnetic history of the moon

A method for determining a planetary body's magnetic field environment over time is proposed. This relative paleointensity method is based on the normalization of natural remanence to saturation remanence magnetization as measured after each sample is exposed to a strong magnetic field. It is shown that this method is well suited to delineating order-of-magnitude changes in magnetizing fields.

Cisowski, S. M.↗

Magnetism of nakhlites and chassignites

Hysteresis measurements on three shergottite and two nakhlite meteorites indicate single domain grain size behavior for the highly shocked Shergotty, Zagami, and EETA 79001 meteorites, with more multidomain-like behavior for the unshocked Nakhla and Governador Valadares meteorites. High viscosity and initial susceptibility for Antarctic shergottite ALHA 7705 indicate the presence of superparamagnetic grains in this specimen. Thermomagnetic analysis indicate Shergotty and Zagami as the least initially oxidized, while EETA 79001 appears to be the most oxidized. Cooling of the meteorite samples from high temperature in air results in a substantial increase in magnetization due to the production of magnetite through oxidation exsolution of titanomagnetite. However, vacuum heating substantially suppresses this process, and in the case of EETA 79001 and Nakhla, results in a rehomogenization of the titanomagnetite grains. Remanence measurements on several subsamples of Shergotty and Zagami meteorites reveal a large variation in intensity that does not seem related to the abundance of remanence carriers. The other meteorites carry only weak remanence, suggesting weak magnetizing fields as the source of their magnetic signal. The meteorites' weak field environment is consistent with Martian or asteroidal body origin but inconsistent with terrestrial origin.

Cisowski, S. M.↗

Lunar magnetic history

The origin of the lunar magnetic field remains a mystery. None of the various speculations are convincing. Suggestions of an early solar system field are not consistent with the low magnetization of the oldest samples. Models based upon a close approach of the Moon to the Earth have to account for the 300 M.Y. approach. Lunar dynamo models must explain why this dynamo which must operate in so small a core can operate so efficiently. It is concluded that it is now hard to escape from the idea that there was a relatively strong ancient lunar field between 3.9 and 3.6 B.Y. Moreover it is curious that the existence of this field coincided with the termination of the heavy bombardment of the Moon and mare basalt extrusion.

Cisowski, S. M.↗

Paleomagnetism of the moon and meteorites

Paleomagnetic investigations (1979-1982) of the nature of the magnetization process and the magnetizing fields which produced magnetization in lunar and meteoritic materials are surveyed. Natural remanence magnetization (NRM), as well as thermoremanence magnetization (TRM), have been measured in carbonaceous chondrites and and L-chondrites to characterize the formation processes occurring when the magnetization was induced. Chemical remanence magnetism, together with the NRM, has been examined in noncarbonaceous chondrites, and NRM intensity and locations have been probed in achondrites. The magnetism has been concluded to arise either from solar magnetic fields, solar nebula magnetic fields, dynamo magnetic fields in the meteorite parent bodies, or locally generated fields caused by processes such as impacts. Lunar samples with NRM have been dated to origins less than 3.6 b.y., and could have been caused by shocks, such as from impacts less than 3 m.y. ago. Discussions of TRM, dynamo, and possible transient magnetic fields from hypervelocity meteoroid impacts as origins of magnetism on the surface and in a lunar magnetic core are presented.

Hood, L. L.↗

A review of lunar paleointensity data and implications for the origin of lunar magnetism

A lunar surface field comparable in intensity to the earth's magnetic field, existing from 3.6 to 3.8 AE, is suggested by paleointensity estimation measurements of more than 50 lunar samples by means of the saturation remanence normalization method. The present data differ from previous descriptions of the lunar field's variation with time, in that the oldest samples are among the most weakly magnetized, and the time of extrusion of the Apollo 11 low and high potassium basalts is suggested to have dropped in paleointensity by an order of magnitude. The coincidence of the high field era with the termination of basin forming impacts at the beginning of mare basalt extrusion suggests a common cause, such as the close approach of the moon to the earth at 3.8 AE.

Cisowski, S. M.↗

Anomalous magnetizations in 3.4 b.y. old Barberton Mountain Land samples

The ratio of natural remanence (NRM) to saturation remanence is exceedingly high for a number of basaltic to ultramafic samples from the 3.4 billion year old Barberton Mountain Land greenstone belt, South Africa. Although conventional paleointensity methods indicate paleofields of several oersteds, demagnetization curves plotted on logarithmic scale clearly show the NRM in these samples to be unlike thermal remanence. It is probable that the observed NRM is a chemical remanence related to the greenschist metamorphic event, and that the intense magnetizations are the result of internally generated, rather than external fields.

Cisowski, S. M.↗

Magnetic field and shock effects and remanent magnetization in a hypervelocity impact experiment

The impact of aluminum projectiles onto high-alumina terrestrial basalt blocks at 13-15 km/s in the presence of a variable magnetic field is studied. Plasma production but not field production was detected, and characteristics of the remanence and the shocked basalt are reported. Mineralogical data suggest that the magnetization acquired in the material near the craters is shock remanence. The experimental results might indicate that shock effects or possibly thermoremanence in ejecta fragments, may be responsible for part of the magnetization of the lunar surface.

Srnka, L. J.↗

On the natural remanent magnetism of certain mare basalts

The natural remanent magnetization (NRM) and magnetic properties of five fine-grain mare basalts were investigated. The NRM of two vitrophyres has a large soft component, and the directional stability during AF demagnetization is poor. The remaining samples have NRM which is too soft to be of thermal origin and yet too hard to be simply isothermal contamination. It is suggested that the NRM of the samples could be shock remanent magnetization.

Fuller, M.↗

Magnetic effects of shock and their implications for lunar magnetism. II

Synthetic breccias were produced by hypervelocity impact of projectiles on basalt powders in order to study the magnetization acquired during shock lithification of soil. It was found that some of the lithified products record the field at the point where they land, while others carry the original primary remanence. Even those rocks recording the direction of the ambient field did not always faithfully record the intensity of the field. When rocks were exposed to shock, it was found that the magnetic hardness of a rock has a profound effect on its magnetic response. Shock effects are seen at shock levels of less than 10 kbar, which suggests that lunar samples may have been shock-demagnetized.

Cisowski, S. M.↗

Magnetic effects of shock and their implications for magnetism of lunar samples

The principal problem in lunar magnetism is to account for the surprisingly large magnitude of the remanent magnetism of lunar surface material. Experiments conducted in this connection have shown that shock is an important mechanism of both magnetization and demagnetization. A description is presented of new experimental results in the low-shock range. An attempt is made to assess the effect of shock upon estimates of the ancient lunar field intensity. The results are used as a basis for a reconsideration of the present lunar field models in the light of intensity estimates and other new results. It is found that the central questions in lunar magnetism have not yet been answered to everyone's satisfaction.

Cisowski, S. M.↗