Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Coder, James G.

Publications and source records attributed to Coder, James G..

The Computational Analysis of a Generic Hypersonic Store Separation

Many current hypersonic vehicles involve a main vehicle from which components separate during flight and presents simulation challenges such as shock-shock interactions, highly nonlinear interactions, and shock wave boundary layer interactions. These aerodynamic phenomena influence the attitude and trajectory of each object, which needs to be understood before large-scale experiments can be run. To gain a generic understanding of the process, high-fidelity Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes solutions are performed on a conical vehicle geometry passing through an oblique shock wave that is representative of different configurations and scenarios. Trajectory and applied forces are tracked and show the vehicle’s dynamics are predominantly the result of differential flow incidence angles causing a strong shock; this leads to a large pressure increase over a fraction of the vehicle, which influences pitch. The vehicle appears to follow conventional stability theory with detached eddy simulation and small disturbances in initial attitude shown to have minimal influence on the scenario.

Savery, Ryan↗

Contributions to HiLiftPW-3 Using Structured, Overset Grid Methods

The High-Lift Common Research Model (HL-CRM) and the JAXA Standard Model (JSM) were analyzed computationally using both the OVERFLOW and LAVA codes for the third AIAA High-Lift Prediction Workshop. Geometry descriptions and the test cases simulated are described. With the HL-CRM, the effects of surface smoothness during grid projection and the effect of partially sealing a flap gap were studied. Grid refinement studies were performed at two angles of attack using both codes. For the JSM, simulations were performed with and without the nacelle/pylon. Without the nacelle/pylon, evidence of multiple solutions was observed when a quadratic constitutive relation is used in the turbulence modeling; however, using time-accurate simulation seemed to alleviate this issue. With the nacelle/pylon, no evidence of multiple solutions was observed. Laminar-turbulent transition modeling was applied to both JSM configuration, and had an overall favorable impact on the lift predictions.

HiLiftPW-3↗

OVERFLOW Contribution to HiLiftPW-3

We plan to perform the following sets of computations: For all our contributions (except where stated) Code: OVERFLOW, Turbulence model: SAnegRCQCR2000. - 1. Results will be submitted for both the full chord flap gap (Case 1a) and partially-sealed Chord Flap gap (Case 1c): 1. Grid Refinement Study; 2. Grids: structured overset grids supplied by HiLiftPW committee; 3. Connectivity: Domain Connectivity Framework, DCF. - 2. Results will be submitted for JAXA Standard Model and Nacelle/Pylon Off (Case 2a), Nacelle/Pylon On (Case 2c): 1. Alpha Study; 2. Grids: structured overset grids supplied by HiLiftPW committee; 3. Connectivity: Pegasus 5 (Peg5). - 3. A study of the effects of different connectivity paradigms: 1. DCF vs Peg5 for HLCRM cases; 2. DCF vs. C3P (NASA Ames) vs. Peg5 for JSM cases; 3. JSM grids will be the focus where we will hopefully see some type of trends with reference to wind tunnel data. - 4. Adaption cases will be attempted for (and submitted where appropriate): 1. Cases 1c,1d: HLCRM; 2. Cases 2c and 2d: JSM; 3. Grid: Near Body grids provided by committee, OffBody grids Cartesian; 4. AMR NearBody and OffBody Adaption. - 5. Case 3 Turbulence model verification study: 1. Grid: Series of 3 finest grids as defined on http://turbmodels.larc.nasa.gov/airfoilwakeverif.html; 2. Turbulence models: SAneg and SAneg— RCQCR2000. OVERFLOW 2.2 is a Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) code developed by NASA...

OVERFLOW↗