Coleff, Daniel | Search NASA

NASA NTRS2018

Calculating the Modal Mineralogy of Aubrite Meteorites Using X-Ray Computed Tomography

The aubrites are a group of differentiated meteorites that formed in extremely reducing conditions, with oxygen fugacities (ƒO2) ranging from ~2 to ~6 log units below the Iron-Wüstite buffer. At these extreme conditions, elements that are lithophile (silica-loving) on Earth can behave as chalcophiles (sulfur-loving) or siderophiles (metal-loving), and FeO-poor silicates and exotic sulfides can form. Elemental partitioning among minerals at these conditions are still not well understood, thus studying aubrites could help better constrain elemental behavior. Only 30 aubrites exist; however, they display various textures, which can be difficult to identify in small samples. Identifying composite clasts can help in understanding the igneous history of the aubrite parent bodies. In order to distinguish different minerals and textures in larger samples, we use X-ray computed tomography (XCT), which is a useful, non-destructive analysis that can produce a 3D representation of a meteorite's textures, structures, and modal mineralogy. This study investigates the Norton County aubrite using XCT. Norton County is a fragmental impact breccia aubrite, and was an observed fall with a main mass of 1.1 tons. This large amount of material offers an opportunity to investigate a great volume of reduced, aubritic sample and study a more diverse variety of clasts. Here we report XCT results of two samples of Norton County (NC 15417) in order to constrain the 3D modal mineralogy of silicates, sulfides, and metals, and to identify unique clasts within the matrix.

Wilbur, Zoe↗

NASA NTRS2018

Applying Modern Analytical Techniques to the Apollo Samples: A Potential Model for Future Sample Return Missions

From 1969-1972 the Apollo missions collected 382 kg of lunar samples from six distinct locations on the Moon. Studies of the Apollo sample suite have shaped our understanding of the formation and early evolution of the Earth-Moon system, and have had important implications for studies of the other terrestrial planets (e.g., through the calibration of the crater counting record). Despite nearly 50 years of research on Apollo samples, scientists are still developing new theories about the origin and evolution of the Moon. In order to resolve these questions, scientists need access to new lunar samples, particularly new plutonic samples. Although no new large plutonic samples (i.e., hand-samples) remain to be discovered in the Apollo sample collection, there are many large polymict breccias in the Apollo collection containing relatively large (1 cm or larger) previously identified plutonic clasts, as well as a large number of unclassified lithic clasts. In addition, new, previously unidentified plutonic clasts are potentially discoverable within these breccias. The question becomes how to non-destructively locate and identify new lithic clasts of interest while minimizing the contamination and physical degradation of the samples.

Zeigler, Ryan A.↗