Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Compton, William B., III

Publications and source records attributed to Compton, William B., III.

7 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1996

Comparison of Turbulence Models for Nozzle-Afterbody Flows with Propulsive Jets

A numerical investigation was conducted to assess the accuracy of two turbulence models when computing non-axisymmetric nozzle-afterbody flows with propulsive jets. Navier-Stokes solutions were obtained for a Convergent-divergent non-axisymmetric nozzle-afterbody and its associated jet exhaust plume at free-stream Mach numbers of 0.600 and 0.938 at an angle of attack of 0 deg. The Reynolds number based on model length was approximately 20 x 10(exp 6). Turbulent dissipation was modeled by the algebraic Baldwin-Lomax turbulence model with the Degani-Schiff modification and by the standard Jones-Launder kappa-epsilon turbulence model. At flow conditions without strong shocks and with little or no separation, both turbulence models predicted the pressures on the surfaces of the nozzle very well. When strong shocks and massive separation existed, both turbulence models were unable to predict the flow accurately. Mixing of the jet exhaust plume and the external flow was underpredicted. The differences in drag coefficients for the two turbulence models illustrate that substantial development is still required for computing very complex flows before nozzle performance can be predicted accurately for all external flow conditions.

Compton, William B., III↗
NASA NTRS1992

Comparison of algebraic turbulence models for afterbody flows with jet exhaust

Three-dimensional Navier-Stokes simulations have been done for transonic and low supersonic flow past a nonaxisymmetric nozzle typical of those advocated for advanced fighter airplanes. The jet exhaust is included in the calculations. The investigation compares the performance of the unmodified Baldwin-Lomax turbulence model with its performance when enhanced by the Degani-Schiff and the Goldberg modifications. Solutions are presented for Mach numbers of 0.80, 0.94, and 1.20 at 0-deg angle of attack and a Reynolds number of 20 x 10 to the 6th. The numerical results, which are compared to the wind-tunnel data, show that the three turbulence models predict considerably different shock locations, separated-flow regions, and flowfields.

Compton, William B., III↗
NASA NTRS1991

Navier-Stokes simulation of nozzle-afterbody flows with jets at off-design conditions

Three-dimensional Navier-Stokes simulations are made for the external flow, the jet-exhaust plume, and the internal nozzle flow of a nonaxisymmetric nozzle typical of those advocated for advanced fighter airplanes. Solutions are presented for free-stream Mach numbers of 0.80, 0.94, and 1.20 at an angle of attack of 0 deg and a Reynolds number of 20 x 10 to the 6th. Jet-total-pressure ratios ranging from 1.5 to 9.8, i.e., from below to above the design pressure ratio of 4.25, are investigated. The results are compared to wind-tunnel data. The calculations successfully predict many trends and features of the external and internal flow.

Compton, William B., III↗
NASA NTRS1990

Navier-Stokes simulation of transonic afterbody flows with jet exhaust

Three-dimensional Navier-Stokes simulations have been made for the transonic flow past a nonaxisymmetric nozzle typical of those advocated for advanced fighter airplanes. Jet exhaust simulation is evaluated as are the Baldwin-Lomax (1978) and Goldberg (1986) turbulence models. Solutions are presented for Mach numbers of 0.80 and 0.94 at 0-deg angle of attack and a Reynolds number of 20 x 10 to the 6th. The numerical results are compared to wind-tunnel data. They show that including the jet exhaust in the calculations gives the most accurate solution near the nozzle exit. Also, the two turbulence models predict considerably different flow fields.

Compton, William B., III↗
NASA NTRS1989

Transonic Navier-Stokes solutions of three-dimensional afterbody flows

The performance of a three-dimensional Navier-Stokes solution technique in predicting the transonic flow past a nonaxisymmetric nozzle was investigated. The investigation was conducted at free-stream Mach numbers ranging from 0.60 to 0.94 and an angle of attack of 0 degrees. The numerical solution procedure employs the three-dimensional, unsteady, Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations written in strong conservation form, a thin layer assumption, and the Baldwin-Lomax turbulence model. The equations are solved by using the finite-volume principle in conjunction with an approximately factored upwind-biased numerical algorithm. In the numerical procedure, the jet exhaust is represented by a solid sting. Wind-tunnel data with the jet exhaust simulated by high pressure air were also obtained to compare with the numerical calculations.

Compton, William B., III↗
NASA NTRS1989

Supersonic Navier-Stokes simulations of turbulent afterbody flows

Four numerical algorithms and three turbulence models are used to solve the thin layer three-dimensional Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations for the supersonic flow past a nonaxisymmetric nozzle. The four numerical algorithms evaluated are based on upwind differencing and feature time-dependent, space relaxation, and parabolized schemes. The three different algebraic turbulence models are the Baldwin-Lomax (1978), the nonequilibrium model of Johnson and King (1985), and the Goldberg (1989) modification for the separated flow region. The present investigation was conducted at freestream Mach numbers of 1.2 and 1.3 and at an angle of attack of 0.0 deg. The Reynolds numbers for the investigation ranged from 20.5 million to 21.5 million, based on the model length. The calculations are compared with experimental data.

Abdol-Hamid, Khaled S.↗