Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Cooley, Jason C.

Publications and source records attributed to Cooley, Jason C..

Utilizing machine learning to predict tensile ductility and yield strength of CoNiV-based multi-principal elements alloys

This study explores the use of machine learning (ML) as a computational tool to accelerate the design of multi-principal element alloys (MPEAs) with improved tensile elongation. An ML model was trained using available experimental data from the literature along with theoretically derived features to predict yield strength (YS) and ductility. A subset of ML-predicted compositions—CoNiVFe, CoNiVTi, CoNiVTiFe, and CoCrNiVTi—was synthesized and evaluated through tensile testing. The ML model underpredicted YS by approximately 20–30 % and overpredicted ductility by 60–70 % for Ti-containing alloys. Microstructural analysis revealed that Ti segregation at interdendritic regions contributed to early fracture, leading to discrepancies in ductility predictions. Ti segregation at these regions likely drives the increased YS due to segregation strengthening. In contrast, the CoNiVFe alloy showed good agreement with both experimental YS and elongation, with prediction errors of ∼10.2 % and ∼20.7 %, respectively. Microstructural characterization revealed minimal segregation in this alloy, suggesting that the ML model can reliably predict the properties of alloys with little to no segregation. These findings highlight the capability of ML in predicting YS with good accuracy but underscore its limitations in capturing defect-driven failure mechanisms such as segregation-induced embrittlement.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Understanding the transport and break up of reactive ejecta

This manuscript investigates reactive- versus hydrodynamic-breakup processes of ejecta. For this paper, the reactive metal is cerium (Ce) and the nonreactive metal is tin (Sn), the nonreactive gas is helium (He) and the reactive gas is deuterium (D 2 ) or hydrogen (H 2 ). Experiments were performed in vacuum and the reactive- and nonreactive-gases at various pressures, where we endeavored to match the post-shock gas densities to differentiate between reactive- versus hydrodynamic-breakup processes. Hydrodynamic breakup sensitively links to the Weber number (gas density, liquid fragment diameter, surface tension, and the square of the relative velocity between the fragment and the gas), whereas reactive breakup links to the reactive dynamics which includes two processes. In one case the reactive metal breaks up into smaller fragments as rapidly as the reaction rate, and in the other a crust grows on the liquid fragments as the reactions occur, a diffusion limited process. In the latter case, the particle diameters increase with time as the crust grows. In this process, which is indicated by the data, particles breakup as the CeD 2 loses strength with increasing temperature, leaving an exponentially increasing diameter.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗