Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Cooney, Greg

Publications and source records attributed to Cooney, Greg.

Generating Emissions Inventory for Carbon Capture and Storage Analysis for Carbon-Intensive Industrial Sectors

Decarbonizing the industrial sector is critical to achieve carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions reductions goals of the Biden Administration. Currently available decarbonization options include electrification, fuel switching to zero carbon fuels like green hydrogen (H2) and carbon capture and storage (CCS). Application of post-combustion carbon capture (PCCC) technology in the power sector, as well as research at the U.S. Department of Energy's Fossil Energy and Carbon Management (FECM) Office has shown that its application in the industrial sector could have co-benefits in the form of emissions reductions of non-CO2 regulated pollutants. For example, solvent based PCCC systems require pre-conditioning of flue gas to remove sulfur and particulate matter (PM) upstream of the CO2 absorber. However, there is a lack of understanding about the type of non-CO2 pollutants which can be captured and the amount of reduction possible. PCCC application differs across industrial sectors as it depends on the availability of decarbonization options, characteristics of industrial processes and the amount and composition of pollutant flows. Certain facilities can also have multiple effluent flows with or without a CO2 stream. As such, understanding industrial processes and their effluent flows in detail is required to quantify the co-benefits opportunities presented by PCCC. Considering this requirement, the goal of this analysis is to develop a high-resolution inventory of effluent flows from facilities of 8 industrial sectors in the U.S. These industrial sectors - ethanol, ammonia, cement, steel, natural gas processing, hydrogen, petroleum refining and wood and pulp products - have carbon-intensive effluent flows, and thus are prime candidates for PCCC applications. In this study, we map the composition of pollutant flow from flue stacks across the identified facilities. Using data available in three Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) databases - the Green House Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), the National Emissions Inventory (NEI) and the Toxic Release Inventory (TRI), we create a combined inventory which lists the type, amount, and concentration of pollutant flows. Using total weight of the pollutant flow back calculated from observed data for CO2 concentrations in flue gas for individual sectors, we calculate the concentration of each pollutant in the flue gas stream. Thus, the resultant emissions inventory includes the following details for each facility in the sector: facility-level and if possible, process-level pollutant flows, concentrations of pollutants in the flue gas, and geographical coordinates of the facilities. A detailed statistical analysis and summary allows us to search for erroneous data and remove them from the final inventory. The generation of the inventory is achieved using a python-based framework which can recreate this inventory for other industrial sectors as well as using newer releases of emission inventories from EPA. The statistical analysis performed on the inventory is also calibrated and automated to identify outliers efficiently.

air pollutants↗

Handling Skewed Emission Distributions in Natural Gas Systems

This work was presented at the American Center for Life Cycle Assessment (ACLCA) LCAXVIII Conference in Fort Collins, CO on September 26, 2018. The presentation showed how NETL's LCA program has gradually improved its methods for uncertainty characterization for upstream natural gas and associated power systems. An objective of uncertainty characterization is to understand the role of system variability without introducing more uncertainty to the data. Non-parametric statistical bootstrapping is one technique for accomplishing this objective and is especially useful for skewed, irregularly-shaped probability distributions. Stochastic modeling is effective at retaining data dependencies, even if specific correlations are not identified.

Littlefield, James↗

Development of an Open-Source Life Cycle Baseline for Electricity Consumption in the U.S. - LCAXVIII

This work was presented at the American Center for Life Cycle Assessment (ACLCA) LCAXVIII Conference in Fort Collins, CO on September 25, 2018. EPA, NETL, and the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) collaborated to develop an open source multifunctional life cycle model to quantify baseline life cycle impacts of U.S. electricity consumption. This presentation discusses the steps that NETL is taking in development of Phase II of the electricity baseline. Specifically, NETL is expanding the spatiotemporal granularity to provide results at multiple levels of aggregation ranging from individual fossil facilities to the aggregated U.S. grid. Phase II will differentiate by individual technologies within fuel types as well as by function in the grid (baseload, cycling, load following, peaking). The supply chain inventory will be expanded with full access to the entire models.

Cooney, Greg↗

Overview of Energy Life Cycle Analysis at NETL - LCAXVIII

This work was presented at the American Center for Life Cycle Assessment (ACLCA) LCAXVIII Conference in Fort Collins, CO on September 25, 2018. At NETL, LCA is used as a tool and framework for undertaking a broad range of evaluations. This overview describes the LCA process at NETL, including unique application of stochastic methods to environmental and economic analyses, and shows highlights from several recent studies.

Skone, Timothy J.↗

Industry Partnerships and their Role in Reducing Natural Gas Supply Chain Greenhouse Gas Emissions

NETL partnered with ONE Future (natural gas industry) to improve operational efficiency and mitigate methane emissions to enhance the nation’s safe and reliable delivery of natural gas. The key findings show that there are industry participants who, through best practices and capital investments, have improved the overall efficiency of their systems. The strategies employed by ONE Future participants are a benchmark that can be followed by other natural gas operators. This collaboration demonstrates how industry and government can work together to improve the understanding of methane emissions and potential reduction strategies that can improve the long-term operational efficiency of the nations’ natural gas production and delivery systems.

03 NATURAL GAS↗

Industry Partnerships and Their Role in Reducing Natural Gas Supply Chain Greenhouse Gas Emissions

This analysis is the product of collaboration between Our Nation’s Energy Future (ONE Future) and the United States (U.S.) Department of Energy’s (DOE) National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL). This analysis has three objectives: 1. Calculate a greenhouse gas (GHG) emission profile representative of ONE Future’s supply chain, including methane (CH4) emission rates. 2. Compare ONE Future’s emission profile to the emission profile for the average U.S. natural gas supply chain. 3. Evaluate specific emission reduction opportunities.

03 NATURAL GAS↗

Overview of Energy Life Cycle Analysis at NETL - LCAXVII

This work was presented at the American Center for Life Cycle Assessment (ACLCA) LCAXVIII Conference in Portsmouth, NH on October 5, 2017. At NETL, LCA is used as a tool and framework for undertaking a broad range of these types of evaluations. This overview describes the LCA process at NETL, including unique application of stochastic methods to environmental and economic analyses, and show highlights from several recent studies.

Skone, Timothy J.↗

Examining the Climate-Energy Nexus for CO2-Enhanced Oil Recovery - LCAXVII

This work was presented at the American Center for Life Cycle Assessment (ACLCA) LCAXVII Conference in Portsmouth, NH on October 4, 2017. An existing LCA model of hydrocarbon fuels produced via CO2-EOR systems is enhanced to more precisely characterize the energy flows alongside the GHG emissions profile. Process energy and material flows are developed based on engineering design principles, the existing unit processes, EOR field parameters, and open source life cycle models including the Petroleum Refinery Life Cycle Inventory Model (PRELIM) and the Oil Production GHG Emissions Estimator (OPGEE). A combinatorial approach is employed to systematically evaluate the energy and environmental profiles of CO2-EOR systems, consisting of permutations of discrete variables: CO2 source, powerplant type, and primary fuel combusted.

Skone, Timothy J.↗

Framework for an Open-Source Life Cycle Baseline for Electricity Consumption in the United States - LCAXVII

This work was presented at the American Center for Life Cycle Assessment (ACLCA) LCAXVII Conference in Portsmouth, NH on October 4, 2017. NETL has developed an open source multifunctional life cycle model to quantify baseline life cycle impacts of U.S. electricity consumption. The life cycle framework is under development in OpenLCA, an open source professional LCA software. The multifunctional framework supports analysis at multiple spatiotemporal timescales as well as modularity to incorporate new datasets. Moreover, the analytic framework provides a complete environmental inventory for U.S. electricity, with the capacity to inform multiple impact assessment methods and to quantify several environmental metrics including air emissions, water use, and energy-consumption indicators.

Ingwerson, Wesley W↗

Life Cycle Analysis of Natural Gas Extraction and Power Generation

This analysis calculates the life cycle environmental burdens for natural gas systems. Two system boundaries are used: a cradle-to-gate boundary that allows analysis of the natural gas supply chain, and a cradle-to-grave boundary that allows analysis of electricity produced from natural gas. For the cradle-to-gate boundary, the functional unit (i.e., the delivered service) is 1 MJ of natural gas delivered by local distribution companies. When the boundaries are expanded to include power generation, the functional unit is the delivery of 1 megawatt-hour (MWh) of electricity to the consumer.

03 NATURAL GAS↗

NETL Upstream Dashboard Version 3

In recent years, the National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) has been using life cycle analysis (LCA) as a new and innovative way to analyze and compare different power production and transportation fuel production pathways. By using LCA, NETL has integrated a holistic approach to comparing energy production pathways instead of solely considering combustion emissions at energy conversion facilities (i.e., power plant or fuels refinery).

29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY↗

Life Cycle Analysis of Coal Exports from the Powder River Basin

The purpose of this study was to compare environmental implications of exporting United States (U.S.) coal resources to Asian markets with respect to alternative global sources of steam coal. This study seeks to evaluate and understand potential environmental consequences of exporting PRB coal compared to global alternative sources of coal. This study was informed by a 10-person industry based Technical Steering Committee to improve the quality of the analysis. The key question addressed by the study: Is there a definitive difference between the life cycle GHG profiles between sourcing coal from the U.S. (PRB), Australia, or Indonesia for Japan, South Korea, or Taiwan? Given the uncertainty in the model parameter values, there is not a definitive difference between the life cycle GHG profiles between sourcing coal from the U.S. (PRB), Australia, or Indonesia for Japan, South Korea, or Taiwan.

01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT↗

Life Cycle Analysis of Coal Exports from the Powder River Basin

This study seeks to evaluate and understand potential environmental consequences of exporting Powder River Basin (PRB) coal compared to global alternative sources of coal. Some of the questions that arise in regards to environmental impacts of PRB exports to Asia include the following. (1) Which stages of the life cycle (e.g., mining, transport, power plant combustion) contribute the most to environmental impacts? (2) How do environmental impacts at each stage differ between the PRB and competing countries? (3) Do environmental impacts differ substantially based on the importing country? (4) Is there a definitive difference between the life cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) profiles between sourcing coal from the U.S. (PRB), Australia, or Indonesia for Japan, South Korea, or Taiwan?

01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT↗