Engineering topics
Coughlin, Daniel R.
Publications and source records attributed to Coughlin, Daniel R..
Perspectives on Quenching and Tempering 4340 Steel
Steels are ubiquitous due to their affordability and the landscape of useful properties that can be generated for engineering applications. But to further expand the performance envelope, one must be able to understand and control microstructure development by alloying and processing. In this paper we use multiscale, advanced characterization to better understand the structural and chemical evolution of AISI 4340 steel after quenching and tempering (Q&T), including the role of quench rate and short-time, isothermal tempering below 573 K (300 °C), with an emphasis on carbide formation. We compare the microstructure and/or property changes produced by conventional tempering to those produced by higher temperature, short-time “rapid” tempering. We underscore that no single characterization technique can fully capture the subtle microstructure changes like carbon redistribution, transition carbide and/or cementite formation, and retained austenite decomposition that occur during Q&T. Only the use of multiple techniques begins to unravel these complexities. After controlled fast or slow quenching, η transition carbides clearly exist in the microstructure, likely associated with autotempering of this high martensite start temperature (Ms) steel. Isothermal tempering below 598 K (325 °C) results in the relief of carbon supersaturation in the martensite, primarily by the formation of η transition carbides that exhibit a range of carbon levels, seemingly without substitutional element partitioning between the carbide and matrix phases. Hägg transition carbide is present between 300 °C and 325 °C. After conventional tempering at or above 598 K (325 °C) for 2 h, cementite is predominant, but small amounts of cementite are also present in other conditions, even after quenching. Previous work has indicated that silicon (Si) and substitutional elements partition between the cementite, which initially forms under paraequilibrium conditions, and the matrix. Phosphorous (P) may also be preferentially located at cementite/matrix interfaces after high temperature tempering. Slower quench rates result in greater amounts of retained austenite compared to those after fast quenching, which we attribute to increased austenite stability resulting from “autopartitioning”. Rapid, high temperature tempering is also found to diminish tempered martensite embrittlement (TME) believed to be associated with the extent of austenite decomposition, resulting in mechanical properties not attainable by conventional tempering, which may have important implications with respect to industrial heat treatment processes like induction tempering. Controlling the amount and stability of retained austenite is not only relevant to the properties of Q&T steels, but also next-generation advanced high strength steels (AHSS) with austenite/martensite mixtures.
Wire-Based Additive Manufacturing of Stainless Steel Components
In this work three different wire-fed additive manufacturing (AM) processes were employed to evaluate differences between laser, arc, and electron beam heat sources used for high-deposition-rate AM on the order of 1 kg/h. Optimum weld and build parameters were developed independently to match the characteristics of each heat source using 308L stainless steel welding wire as the feedstock. Laser-wire AM was made with the lowest energy per unit length of weld and had the best control of the melt pool and surface finish. Wire arc-based AM had an intermediate energy per unit length of weld of approximately 5× that of the laser process, while electron beam wire AM had the highest energy per unit length of weld at approximately 10× that of the laser process. Analysis of the parts that were built included evaluation of mechanical properties and microstructures, and these properties are discussed with respect to the difference in input energy and cooling rates. Results show that all three processes build parts with properties that exceed those of annealed 304L wrought stainless steel. However, significant differences exist between the processes, and the results presented here can be used to help select the best wire-fed process for a given high-deposition-rate application.