Engineering topics

Cox, Richard A.

Publications and source records attributed to Cox, Richard A..

4 records

NASA NTRS1994

Temperature dependent absorption cross-sections of HNO3 and N2O5

Absorption cross-sections for HNO3 and N2O5 have been measured in the wavelength region 220-450 nm, using a dual beam diode array spectrometer with a spectral resolution of 0.3 nm. The results for both compounds are in good agreement with recommended values at room temperature. However, the cross-sections of both HNO3 and N2O5 show a marked reduction with decreasing temperature in the range 295-233 K. The calculated photolysis rate of HNO3 at the low temperatures and high solar zenith angles characteristic of the polar winter and spring is significantly lower than previously estimated.

Rattigan, Oliver V.↗

NASA NTRS1990

Halocarbon ozone depletion and global warming potentials

Concern over the global environmental consequences of fully halogenated chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) has created a need to determine the potential impacts of other halogenated organic compounds on stratospheric ozone and climate. The CFCs, which do not contain an H atom, are not oxidized or photolyzed in the troposphere. These compounds are transported into the stratosphere where they decompose and can lead to chlorine catalyzed ozone depletion. The hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs or HFCs), in particular those proposed as substitutes for CFCs, contain at least one hydrogen atom in the molecule, which confers on these compounds a much greater sensitivity toward oxidation by hydroxyl radicals in the troposphere, resulting in much shorter atmospheric lifetimes than CFCs, and consequently lower potential for depleting ozone. The available information is reviewed which relates to the lifetime of these compounds (HCFCs and HFCs) in the troposphere, and up-to-date assessments are reported of the potential relative effects of CFCs, HCFCs, HFCs, and halons on stratospheric ozone and global climate (through 'greenhouse' global warming).

Cox, Richard A.↗

NASA NTRS1990

Degradation mechanisms of selected hydrochlorofluorocarbons in the atmosphere: An assessment of the current knowledge

Volatile organic compounds are mainly degraded in the troposphere by attack of OH with abstraction of H atoms or addition to unsaturated linkages. The chlorofluorocarbons (CFC's) do not contain these reactive sites and consequently cannot be degraded in this way in the lower atmosphere. This results in pollution of the stratosphere by these molecules and attendant problems for ozone. The proposed replacements for CFC's, the hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFC's), and hydrofluorocarbons (HFC's), contain at least one hydrogen atom in the molecule, which confers on these compounds a greater sensitivity toward oxidation by OH in the troposphere and in the lower stratosphere, resulting in much shorter atmospheric lifetimes than the CFC's. Consequently, the Ozone Depletion Potential and the Atmospheric Warming Potential are reduced substantially compared to the CFC's. All the possible degradation processes of the HCFC's and HFC's proposed to replace the CFC's are examined with the principal aim of identifying chlorine- and fluorine-containing products which are stable under tropospheric conditions.

Cox, Richard A.↗

NASA NTRS1989

Observations and theories related to Antarctic ozone changes

In 1985, there was a report of a large, sudden, and unanticipated decrease in the abundance of springtime Antarctic ozone over the last decade. By 1987, ozone decreases of more than 50 percent in the total column, and 95 percent locally between 15 and 20 km, had been observed. The scientific community quickly rose to the challenge of explaining this remarkable discovery; theoreticians soon developed a series of chemical and dynamical hypotheses to explain the ozone loss. Three basic theories were proposed to explain the springtime ozone hole. (1) The ozone hole is caused by the increasing atmospheric loadings of manmade chemicals containing chlorine (chlorofluorocarbons (CFC's) and bromine (halons)). These chemicals efficiently destroy ozone in the lower stratosphere in the Antarctic because of the special geophysical conditions, of an isolated air mass (polar vortex) with very cold temperatures, that exist there. (2) The circulation of the atmosphere in spring has changed from being predominantly downward over Antarctica to upward. This would mean that ozone poor air from the troposphere, instead of ozone rich air from the upper stratosphere, would be transported into the lower Antarctic stratosphere. (3) The abundance of the oxides of nitrogen in the lower Antarctic stratosphere is periodically enhanced by solar activity. Nitrogen oxides are produced in the upper mesosphere and thermosphere and then transported downward into the lower stratosphere in Antarctica, resulting in the chemical destruction of ozone. The climatology and trends of ozone, temperature, and polar stratospheric clouds are discussed. Also, the transport and chemical theories for the Antarctic ozone hole are presented.

Hartmann, D.↗