Daniel B Gazda | Search NASA

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Effects of Ambient Alcohol Levels on the Real-time Monitoring of the Atmosphere of the International Space Station

Effects of Ambient Alcohol Levels on the Real-time Monitoring of the Atmosphere of the International Space StationWilliam T. Wallace,1 Thomas F. Limero,1 Kenneth W. Clark,2 and Daniel B. Gazda31KBR, 2400 NASA Pkwy., Houston, TX 770582JES Tech, 16870 Royal Crest Dr., Houston, TX 770583NASA Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center, 2101 NASA Pkwy., Houston, TX 77058Monitoring of the spacecraft environment is required to ensure the safety of the crew and the health of the vehicle systems. For the ISS atmosphere, routine monitoring has been performed for many years by the Major Constituent Analyzer (MCA) and two Air Quality Monitors (AQMs), which, together, are used to monitor for trace (ppb) levels of 22 volatile organic compounds (VOCs). The target compounds measured by the AQMs include three types of chemicals: 1) those compounds that would be harmful to crew, 2) those compounds that have been detected regularly in archival samples, and 3) compounds that, while not necessarily harmful to crew health, could present problems for Environmental Control and Life Support Systems (ECLSS).In March 2019, following the docking of SpaceX-Demo1 (SpX-DM1), the on-board AQMs began to report extremely high levels of isopropyl alcohol (IPA). While elevated IPA is not abnormal following the docking of visiting vehicles (due to cleaning of the cargo prior to flight), the level measured by the AQM, and its continued presence following multiple days of scrubbing, caused concerns regarding the U.S. Water Recovery System. Following the departure of SpX-DM1, the IPA levels decreased to nominal levels, allowing the team to investigate the cause of the elevated measurements. Initially, based on the changes in the shape of the gas chromatograph (GC) traces in the IPA region during docked operations, it appeared that some unknown coeluting species was causing problems with quantification. However, with the docking of Northrup-Grumman-11 (NG-11), the elevated IPA concentrations returned, as well as the changes in GC traces. In contrast to the SpX-DM1 results, though, the AQM IPA results did not return to nominal levels following the departure of NG-11, suggesting that the changes could not be tied directly to the visiting vehicle.In this paper, we will discuss a number of potential causes for both the genuine (measured in archival samples) increases in IPA as well as the much higher levels measured by the AQM. Additionally, we will discuss methods being explored to decrease the potential for a reoccurrence in the future.

William T Wallace↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Quantitation of Trace Water in ISS Atmosphere Samples Recovered from CO2-Removal Systems

As crewed spaceflight continues to push the limits of exploration, instruments and hardware used to maintain and monitor crew and vehicle health must become more integrated, reliable, and efficient. By combining a carbon dioxide (CO2) removal system with a resource recovery system like a Sabatier or Bosch reactor, the waste gas from the removal system can be converted into valuable resources that help reduce reliance on ground resupply. Due to the high-pressure nature of the Sabatier and Bosch reactions, the vent gas from most CO2 removal systems will need to be compressed before it can be processed. In order to prevent condensation in the compressor of the recovery system, it is critical to ensure that the vent stream from the CO2 removal system does not contain an excess of water. There are currently three different CO2 removal systems that are being developed as candidates for exploration missions. Each of these systems will be evaluated as a technology demonstration on ISS, and vent gas samples will be collected in Summa sampling canisters fitted with Entech valves. Due to the need to measure low levels of water in these samples, it was not possible to use the current ISS miniature grab sample containers (GSCs) to collect these samples. The Summa containers, which were used to collect archive samples during Shuttle missions, have a different surface treatment that makes it possible to measure the low levels of water in samples collected in these containers. This paper will provide some background on the CO2 removal systems being evaluated for exploration missions as well as results from ground-based testing of the current miniature GSCs and Summa canisters. Details on the development of the analytical method and the plan for preparing the canisters that will be used for in-flight sampling are also discussed.

Steven W Beck↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Chemical Challenge Tests on ISS Fire Cartridges

Following a confirmed combustion event onboard the International Space Station (ISS), crewmembers will don Emergency Masks, each fitted with 2 ISS fire cartridge filters. As the crewmember breathes through the filters, combustion products in the cabin air are either filtered or catalyzed by the fire cartridge media to minimize crew exposure to harmful levels of contaminants. Rigorous certification, acceptance, and surveillance programs for the fire cartridges ensure that each lot meets stringent performance requirements during the beginning of and throughout the service life of the cartridges. In accordance with the Quality/Acceptance Test Plan, multiple fire cartridges from each lot undergo chemical challenge tests, with each test lasting 2.5 hours and involving one or more chemicals at specified concentrations. These tests are conducted at specific temperatures, humidity levels, and gas flow rates intended to mimic the worst-case conditions for fire cartridge performance. These challenge tests are conducted by the Environmental Chemistry Laboratory at the NASA Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center. The majority of the challenge tests focus on carbon monoxide (CO), but other gases include hydrogen cyanide (HCN), hydrogen chloride (HCl), cyclohexane, acrolein, and acetaldehyde. A fire cartridge is exposed to the test gas in a test chamber at the specified conditions and the outlet is monitored for breakthrough during the 2.5-hour test. This paper will briefly introduce fire cartridges and how they work, then discuss details of the challenge gas delivery and exposure system, breakthrough monitoring methods, and discussion of issues that have arisen during the course of the test program. Although the focus of this paper will be on the conduction of the challenge tests, a general summary of the performance of the fire cartridges will be provided.

Fire Cartridge↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Differential Mobility Spectrometry on the ISS: Successes and Current Concerns

With the construction of the International Space Station (ISS), crew members moved from the relatively short flights of the Space Shuttle (~ 2 weeks) to missions lasting months to a year. As such, environmental monitoring needs also changed, transitioning from a reliance on archival sampling to a combination of archival sampling and in-flight data collection. In the case of trace volatile organic compound (VOC) monitoring, this in-flight monitoring was performed early on by the Volatile Organic Analyzer (VOA), a gas chromatograph-ion mobility spectrometer, which operated on the ISS for 7 years. This large, fixed-position analyzer was replaced by Air Quality Monitors (AQMs), a pair of small gas chromatograph-differential mobility spectrometers, in the spring of 2013. During their initial half decade of use, and covering multiple sets of units, the AQMs performed well, meeting all of their validation criteria and generally showing excellent accuracy when compared to the now-reduced archival samples. These instruments were also used to perform a survey of the US Operating Segment (US Lab Module, European Columbus Module, and Japanese Pressurized Module), confirming that the atmosphere in this segment is well-mixed. The AQMs were also able to provide important information in contingency situations, such as confirming that no ammonia was present on the ISS following alarms suggesting that the coolant loops had leaked in January 2015. As the fleet of AQMs has aged, though, issues of concern have arisen. These have ranged from pervasive electronics board problems to loss of sensitivity due to carbon dioxide to incorrect identification of compounds. Some of these issues are unavoidable due to the nature of the AQM’s use and preparation prior to flight. However, with the extension of the ISS to 2030 (well past its original 2024 lifetime), the fleet of AQMs will be asked to perform longer, requiring solutions to some of the inherent problems. In this presentation, we will discuss the history of the AQM on the ISS with a focus on more recent results. These results show both the continued usefulness of the AQM for atmospheric monitoring and also the current concerns, including: 1) the incorrect identification of benzene, 2) reporting of elevated isopropanol concentrations, and 3) the loss of the reactant ion peak (RIP) that must be resolved in order for the instrument to continue to serve as the primary trace VOC monitor on the ISS.

W T Wallace↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Analysis of Volatile Compounds from CO2 Removal Systems

One of the primary concerns when designing CO2 scrubber systems that will be integrated with a Sabatier reactor to produce water and methane is the amount of water released from the scrubber. Because the gas stream entering a Sabatier reactor must be compressed, water entering the reactor can condense and compromise the integrity of the system, thus rendering its valuable conversion capability useless. When the Johnson Space Center Environmental Chemistry Laboratory was tasked to develop an assay to quantify the water concentration in air samples from CO2 scrubbers, additional testing was also performed to see if any other compounds were being concentrated on the scrubbers. It was thought that the efficiency of the scrubber systems could be quantified by comparing the differences in samples from the ambient air on the International Space Station (ISS) to the exit gas of the scrubber. As this analysis was carried out, it became evident that the concentrations of certain volatile compounds were higher in the samples from the scrubbers than they were in nominal environmental samples. This meant these compounds were being retained and concentrated on the scrubber beds. Based on this finding, concerns were raised about their potential for these compounds to poison the Sabatier reactor. Further investigation was required to identify these compounds due to their high concentrations and unique matrix of the CO2 scrubber exhaust. This paper describes these events as well as the process that was developed to identify the volatile compounds that increased. An examination of how much the certain compounds can be concentrated by the scrubber systems is also included.

Volatiles↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Analysis of Volatile Compounds From CO2 Removal Systems

One of the primary concerns when designing CO2 scrubber systems that will be integrated with a Sabatier reactor to produce water and methane is the amount of water released from the scrubber. Because the gas stream entering a Sabatier reactor must be compressed, water entering the reactor can condense and compromise the integrity of the system, thus rendering its valuable conversion capability useless. When the Johnson Space Center Environmental Chemistry Laboratory was tasked to develop an assay to quantify the water concentration in air samples from CO2 scrubbers, additional testing was also performed to see if any other compounds were being concentrated on the scrubbers. It was thought that the efficiency of the scrubber systems could be quantified by comparing the differences in samples from the ambient air on the International Space Station (ISS) to the exit gas of the scrubber. As this analysis was carried out, it became evident that the concentrations of certain volatile compounds were higher in the samples from the scrubbers than they were in nominal environmental samples. This meant these compounds were being retained and concentrated on the scrubber beds. Based on this finding, concerns were raised about their potential for these compounds to poison the Sabatier reactor. Further investigation was required to identify these compounds due to their high concentrations and unique matrix of the CO2 scrubber exhaust. This paper describes these events as well as the process that was developed to identify the volatile compounds that increased. An examination of how much the certain compounds can be concentrated by the scrubber systems is also included.

Volatiles↗