Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Daniel Hauser

Publications and source records attributed to Daniel Hauser.

At least 19 records

Thermal Desktop Modeling of the RRM3 On-Orbit Cryogenic Methane Storage and Active Cooling Experiment

The storing of cryogenic propellants is an enabling technology for NASA as it moves to expand future missions into low Earth orbit (LEO) and beyond. The Robotic Refueling Mission–3 (RRM3) experiment launched in 2018 and was designed to demonstrate tank self-pressurization during storage and active cooling of liquid methane in microgravity. Creating accurate models using existing datasets from flight experiments such as RRM3 is a vital step toward developing appropriate modeling tools to form pre-test predictions for future flight systems. The goal of this work was to create a working model in Thermal Desktop of the RRM3 source Dewar during the microgravity self-pressurization experiment. The pressure rise, temperature distribution of the fluid inside the tank, and the wall temperatures were all tracked and compared with test data. Initial results show good agreement between each of these metrics and the experimental results. This work is ongoing and will yield further insights into the thermal behavior of cryogens in microgravity.

Tank self-pressurization↗

Autogenous Pressurization of a Cryogenic Tank using Computational Fluid Dynamics

Well-validated simulation tools can be used to predict long-term storage and transfer of cryogenic propellants, which are essential to NASA’s mission plan to return to the Moon and continue to Mars. Autogenous pressurization of propellant tanks is used to supply rocket engine turbopumps with pressurized liquid fuel and oxidizer, preventing cavitation. Additionally, autogenous pressurization can be used to pressurize propellant tanks to support on-orbit propellant transfer. In lieu of expensive tests conducted on-orbit, accurate predictive computational models of these processes can be used to reduce system and propellant mass as well as mission risk. Using simulation tools also reduces the cost of analyzing and developing this technology. This study presents a multiphase computational fluid dynamics model capable of simulating autogenous pressurization of a large cryogenic tank using the commercial code STAR-CCM+. Experimental data from a full-scale tank pressurization test under terrestrial gravity is compared to simulation results using transient error metrics. Comparisons show good agreement and give confidence in using these and other validated simulation tools to develop cryogenic pressurization systems. Note: There is no audio file included or available for this presentation.

cryogenics↗

Modeling Autogenous Pressurization and Draining of a Cryogenic Storage Tank in Normal Gravity

A two-phase CFD model for autogenous pressurization and draining of a cryogenic storage tank is presented using both the Sharp Interface and Volume-Of-Fluid (VOF) approaches for capturing the front and the associated interfacial heat, mass and momentum transfer between the liquid and vapor regions. Both models are validated against data provided by the Cryogenic Propellant Storage and Transfer (CPST) Engineering Development Unit (EDU) experiment. The results of the autogenous pressurization are presented first, focusing on the phase change and turbulence effects on the tank pressure and temperature predictions. Both the Sharp Interface (SI-CFD) and VOF (VOF-CFD) multiphase models predict tank pressure during pressurization within 3% of the measured values. The sensitivity of key physical and numerical parameters of the problem are tested using the Sharp Interface model. Effects of the accommodation coefficient (AC), and the computational grid structure are studied. The second part of this paper is devoted to validating the SI-VOF model, with an enhanced capability of moving the liquid-vapor interface, against the draining segment of the EDU experiment. The VOF-CFD model was also used to simulate tank draining and its results were compared with the results of the Sharp Interface model with the moving interface. Both models predict tank pressure during draining within 3.5% of the measured values. Pressure decrease rate is underpredicted by both models during the first 100 seconds of draining but matches the experimental rate for the rest of the simulation.

Computational Fluid Dynamics↗

CFD Model Development of a Cryogenic Storage Tank Self-Pressurization in Normal Gravity and Validation against SHIIVER Experiment

Two-phase flow and heat transfer simulations with interfacial phase change of the Structural Heat Intercept, Insulation, and Vibration Evaluation Rig (SHIIVER) self-pressurization experiment were conducted using storage tank CFD model in the framework of the ANSYS Fluent CFD code. The simulations were performed for the 70% fill level case with MLI on domes and no vapor cooling. All the phase change calculations in these simulations were generated by in-house Schrage-based evaporation-condensation model. The calculations were performed using both the Volume of Fluid (VOF) and Sharp Interface multiphase 2D axisymmetric models. A number of parametric and sensitivity studies were performed to check the various aspects of the CFD model. These studies helped to understand the effects of varying several parameters on the tank pressure and temperature during self-pressurization. Turbulence modeling; turbulence damping at the interface; and using constant vs. temperature dependent fluid properties were shown to have the most profound influence on predicted tank pressures and temperatures. Current study indicates that including phase change at the interface into the computational model is crucial for accurate prediction of the tank self-pressurization process. The effect of accommodation coefficient was also studied. Tank pressure values predicted by the VOF, and Sharp Interface models are within 4% of the experimental ones.

Computational Fluid Dynamics↗

CFD Modeling of a Cryogenic Methane Drain Test with and without Induced Sloshing

Current planned NASA missions to the Moon and Mars involve the transfer of cryogenic propellants in orbit. These activities require large amounts of cryogenic propellant and the ability to transfer these fluids from one tank to another in an efficient manner. Predicting the pressurant required for the supply tank pressurization during the initial pressurization and expulsion process will be important to understand priori to reduce propellant margin.

Low Gravity Fluid Modeling↗

Modelling of Liquid Hydrogen No-Vent-Fill Tests Using Thermal Desktop

Efficient cryogenic propellant transfer is important to the success of upcoming NASA missions to the Moon and Mars. The no-vent-fill method is a promising approach that allows for simple low-loss propellant transfers over a wide range of ambient thermal and acceleration conditions. This approach has been previously studied in 3 separate experiments at NASA Glenn Research Center using liquid hydrogen in tanks ranging in volume from 34 to 5000 liters. Thermal/fluid models of the test subject tanks and supporting experimental hardware are developed using a Thermal Desktop twin-tank compartment approach. A key feature of the modelling is to replace the Thermal Desktop default values of liquid-vapor heat transfer coefficients with correlations from literature better chosen to match the fluid dynamics and phase change thermodynamics occurring in the tests. Details of the modelling effort and comparisons of model predictions to the NASA test datasets are presented and discussed.

Low Gravity Fluid Modeling↗

Modeling of A Large-Scale Liquid Oxygen Propellant Transfer Test

Current planned NASA missions to the Moon and Mars involve the transfer of cryogenic propellants in orbit. Correctly predicting the flow rate during the propellant transfer operation could help with planning these operations. In lieu of expensive tests conducted on-orbit, accurate predictive computational models of these propellant transfer processes can be used to predict the propellant transfer flow rate. To gain confidence in these computational models, appropriate anchoring and validation to experimental data can be performed. Ground tests conducted at SpaceX involving the transfer of liquid oxygen were carried out to investigate the effect of the thermodynamic conditions including inlet pressure and temperature and downstream pressure on the flow rate. The results from the test were compared against flow rate predictions from a commercially available two-phase flow software. On average the model predicted the flow rates within 10% of the experimentally observed flow rates for the full range of thermodynamic inlet and outlet conditions.

Daniel Hauser↗

Validation of a Two-Phase CFD Model for Predicting Propellant Tank Pressurization and Pressure Collapse in The Ground-Based K-Site Hydrogen Slosh Experiment

A two-phase CFD model for tank pressurization and following sloshing in a cryogenic storage tank partially filled with liquid hydrogen is presented using the Volume-Of-Fluid approach for representing the phase boundary and the associated interfacial heat, mass and momentum transfer between the liquid and the vapor regions. The CFD model was validated against pressurization and sloshing data for a 62 cubic foot tank provided by Moran et al. Cases with different sloshing amplitudes and frequencies are studied. The results of modeling tank pressurization are presented first followed by the results of sloshing cases. Predicted tank pressures are compared with the experimental data.

Computational Fluid Dynamics↗

Mastering the Cryogenic Frontier: Predicting Sloshing in Cryogenic Propellant Tanks

In recent years, NASA has undertaken the development and validation of computation fluid dynamic (CFD) models for predicting cryogenic two-phase sloshing within propellant tanks. These models have been rigorously anchored against cryogenic ground tests that induce sloshing, as well as limited microgravity tests. The primary focus of these models is to accurately predict the two-phase condensation and, at times, evaporation within the cryogenic propellant. This approach is important for estimating the required autogenous and/or helium pressurant for completing propulsion system burns or ensuring adequate pressure for in-space propellant transfers. Unlike in hypergolic propulsion systems, where the propellant is stored at room temperature, cryogenic propellant is highly volatile. Therefore, ensuring the accurate estimation of pressurant necessitates the precise modeling of two-phase interfacial heat and mass transfer processes. This paper aims to provide an overview of NASA’s continuing efforts in developing and validating these CFD models, with particular emphasis on benchmark cases with sloshing that enhances phase change, tracing their historical development, and demonstrating their predictive accuracy when compared to test results.

low-gravity fluid modeling↗

Exploring Cryogenic Propellant Behavior in Low-Gravity Environments, Insights from the Saturn AS-203 Vent Experiments and CFD Analysis

In the 1960s, NASA embarked on a series of groundbreaking flight tests on the Saturn AS-203, aiming to understand the complex dynamics of propellants in the distinctive low-gravity lunar environment. These tests centered on venting experiments, subjecting cryogenic liquid hydrogen to conditions beneath its saturation pressure while accelerating the vehicle to manage the propellant's positioning. During these experiments, NASA meticulously scrutinized the propellant tank using a suite of instruments, including temperature and pressure sensors, as well as a camera placed internal to the liquid hydrogen tank. The outcomes provided anecdotal evidence revealing the phenomenon of boiling along the tank's walls and the intriguing formation of liquid globules and droplets in the ullage during the venting process. Notably, the substantial drop in liquid temperature during these tests suggests adiabatic cooling as liquid hydrogen evaporates. This evaporation leads to a cooling of the remaining hydrogen due to the heat it releases. This paper presents the outcomes of our initial analysis, wherein CFD models were used to simulate the observed boiling phenomena and the bulk movement of the liquid hydrogen propellant, both qualitatively and quantitatively. The implications of these findings may extend to mission and vehicle designers, providing invaluable insights for crafting more efficient and effective in-space propulsion systems utilizing cryogenic propellant including impacts to vehicle control systems. Understanding propellant behavior under these conditions may better inform GNC teams, ensuring more stable vehicle operations when utilizing cryogenic propellants. This includes essential considerations for cryogenic propellant transfer and storage systems, integral to NASA's forthcoming Artemis missions. While we recognize the challenges tied to CFD models, this study represents a step forward, highlighting current progress and signaling the potential for refining our predictive understanding in the future.

Computational Fluid Dynamics↗

Exploring Cryogenic Propellant Behavior in Low-Gravity Environments, Insights from the Saturn AS-203 Vent Experiments and CFD Analysis

In the 1960s, NASA embarked on a series of groundbreaking flight tests on the Saturn AS-203, aiming to understand the complex dynamics of propellants in the distinctive low-gravity lunar environment. These tests centered on venting experiments, subjecting cryogenic liquid hydrogen to conditions beneath its saturation pressure while accelerating the vehicle to manage the propellant's positioning. During these experiments, NASA meticulously scrutinized the propellant tank using a suite of instruments, including temperature and pressure sensors, as well as a camera placed internal to the liquid hydrogen tank. The outcomes provided anecdotal evidence revealing the phenomenon of boiling along the tank's walls and the intriguing formation of liquid globules and droplets in the ullage during the venting process. Notably, the substantial drop in liquid temperature during these tests suggests adiabatic cooling as liquid hydrogen evaporates. This evaporation leads to a cooling of the remaining hydrogen due to the heat it releases. This paper presents the outcomes of our initial analysis, wherein CFD models were used to simulate the observed boiling phenomena and the bulk movement of the liquid hydrogen propellant, both qualitatively and quantitatively. The implications of these findings may extend to mission and vehicle designers, providing invaluable insights for crafting more efficient and effective in-space propulsion systems utilizing cryogenic propellant including impacts to vehicle control systems. Understanding propellant behavior under these conditions may better inform GNC teams, ensuring more stable vehicle operations when utilizing cryogenic propellants. This includes essential considerations for cryogenic propellant transfer and storage systems, integral to NASA's forthcoming Artemis missions. While we recognize the challenges tied to CFD models, this study represents a step forward, highlighting current progress and signaling the potential for refining our predictive understanding in the future.

Computational Fluid Dynamics↗

Addressing CFM Modeling Gaps for Application into NASA’S Future Cutting Edge Missions

NASA, the US industry, and international partners are crafting frameworks to enable sustaining lunar missions. The ongoing programs, led by the agency, and prominent industry players, encompass plans for the sustained use of cryogenic propellants in lunar landers and in-space propellant refueling depots. NASA’s proactive funding initiatives have fueled the advancement of predictive computational models tailored to enhance the storage and transfer of cryogenic propellant. This paper aims to spotlight the latest advancements in this arena and delve into the collaborative efforts surrounding predictive model development within internal NASA programs as well as current and previous collaborations with industry and international partners. The paper presents an overview of recent advancements in cryogenic fluid management model development, along with their correlation with recent microgravity and large-scale cryogenic ground tests. The tests include key experiments such as the ISS Zero-Boil-Off Tank (ZBOT) series of experiments and the (Robotic Refueling Mission 3) RRM3 test during which liquid methane was stored on-orbit for an extended period of five months. The paper also highlights the anchoring of propellant tank pressurized drain tests involving sloshing that were conducted with liquid methane propellant during the Apollo/Saturn Era. Additionally, the paper discusses model anchoring against more recent sloshing tests carried out with liquid hydrogen propellant. Notable large-scale tests, such as a liquid oxygen propellant transfer test conducted by SpaceX were also used to help correlate a two-phase propellant transfer model using the valuable data measured during the test. The paper further showcases model correlations against a substantial oxygen liquefaction test undertaken by NASA to validate In-Situ-Resource-Utilization (ISRU) technologies that will prove pivotal for a sustained lunar presence.

Low-gravity fluid modeling↗

Validation of a Two-Phase CFD Model for Autogenous Pressurization and Expulsion

This paper presents a two-phase CFD model for tank pressurization and expulsion in a liquid hydrogen cryogenic storage tank. The model uses a Volume-of-Fluid approach combined with the Kinetics-based Schrage equation to capture the phase boundary and the associated interfacial heat, mass, and momentum transfer between the liquid and vapor regions. The CFD model is validated against expulsion data from the NASA K-Site tank experiment. Predicted tank pressures, temperatures, and pressurant requirements are compared with the experimental data to demonstrate the model’s accuracy.

Autogenous Pressurization↗

Modeling Self-Pressurization and Spray Bar Pressure Control of a Cryogenic Storage Tank in Normal Gravity

This paper presents Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) models for simulating self-pressurization and spray bar cooling processes in a large-scale liquid hydrogen storage tank under normal gravity. The self-pressurization model utilizes the kinetics-based Schrage equation with the Volume-Of-Fluid (VOF) model to account for the evaporative and condensing interfacial mass fluxes. It uses a laminar approach to model natural convection and compares the pressures and temperatures predicted by the CFD model with experimental data from the Multipurpose Hydrogen Test Bed (MHTB) self-pressurization experiment. Additionally, the predicted interfacial mass flux is presented. A CFD model for simulating pressure control using a spray bar is also presented. An Eulerian-Lagrangian approach models the interactions between the discrete droplets and the continuous ullage phase. The spray model is coupled with the VOF model by tracking particles in the ullage, removing particles from the ullage when they reach the interface, and then adding their contributions to the liquid. The T-sat model is used to calculate the droplet-ullage heat and mass transfer. In this model, droplets warm up to the saturation temperature corresponding to the ullage vapor pressure thereafter evaporating while remaining at the saturation temperature. The tank pressure, vapor, and liquid temperature evolutions are validated against data from the MHTB spray bar mixing experiment.

Self-Pressurization↗

Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation of Methane Slosh and Drain Experiments

NASA possesses a wealth of historical cryogenic experiments that provide valuable insights into the design, troubleshooting, and understanding involved in the complex fluid and thermodynamics of managing cryogenic propellants. One approach to leveraging these historical datasets is by simulating these experiments to validate the accuracy of simulation environments and constituent models. This study focused on simulating a selection of the K site test series for both static and sloshing pressurized liquid methane draining experiments conducted at NASA in the 1970’s, utilizing computational fluid dynamics. The simulations were performed in the ANSYS FLUENT environment using the Volume of Fluid (VOF) numerical approach. A k-omega turbulence model was used with interfacial turbulence damping, and accurately predicted the amount of pressurant needed to maintain the required tank pressure throughout the static drain. The static simulation predicted the temperature stratification in the ullage observed at the end of the drain. During the methane expulsion with sloshing test, many features were successfully captured using the k-omega turbulence model with interfacial turbulence damping included. The rate of phase change and liquid temperature was overpredicted compared to the experimental measurements. The overprediction may be attributed to uncertainties in the vessel geometry, methane pressurant temperature and composition, and methodological differences in how the sloshing frequency was adjusted during the expulsion.

Cryogenic Propellants↗

Validation of a Two-Phase CFD Model for Autogenous Pressurization and Expulsion

This paper presents a two-phase computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model for simulating autogenous pressurization and expulsion in a cryogenic liquid hydrogen storage tank, utilizing a volume-of-fluid (VOF) approach combined with the kinetics-based Schrage equation to accurately capture the phase boundary and interfacial heat, mass, and momentum transfer between liquid and vapor phases. The model is validated against experimental data from NASA's K-site tank facility, specifically experimental case 225, which involved pressurization and controlled expulsion of liquid hydrogen. Various turbulence models are evaluated to assess their influence on model accuracy. The CFD simulations successfully replicate key thermodynamic behaviors observed during the experiments, including pressure evolution, temperature profiles, and phase-change dynamics at the vapor-liquid interface. The predicted tank pressures, temperatures, and pressurant requirements agree with experimental data, with pressurant mass predictions within 16\% of observed values. This study highlights the importance of selecting appropriate turbulence models to accurately simulate complex flow and heat transfer phenomena during tank pressurization and expulsion. By enhancing the accuracy and reliability of CFD models for liquid hydrogen under cryogenic conditions, this research contributes to developing efficient cryogenic propellant management strategies for future space missions.

Computational Fluid Dynamics↗

Improved Models for Simulation of Cryogenic Spray Cooling for Propellant Tank Chilldown

This paper presents advances in spray boiling models for cryogenic fluids that exhibit strong variation in thermodynamic properties; it accounts for the interaction of the spray droplets with walls and the complex heat transfer and boiling processes that play a vital role in chilling solid surfaces. The model has been developed by corroborating and validating it with test data in liquid nitrogen obtained at the University of Connecticut. The test data includes detailed visualization and plate temperature measurements for liquid nitrogen sprays impinging on a warm test plate and subsequent transient chilldown of the plate. Simulations of transient plate chilldown in liquid nitrogen were carried out and temperature histories at various locations on the plate were compared with test measurements to demonstrate the validity of the spray boiling models that have been developed for cryogens.

Boiling↗