Engineering topics

Daniel L Engel

Publications and source records attributed to Daniel L Engel.

5 records

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Guidance and Control Techniques for Titan Aerogravity Assist for Enceladus Observation

Enceladus is a prime scientific target due active geological features and evidence that liquid water might be present on this Saturnian moon. The surface of Enceladus is covered in active fissures known as “Tiger Stripes”. The plumes coming from these rifts were sampled by the Cassini mission, which detected carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, and nitrogen – all key signatures where life could exit. In order to access this moon, mission design using traditional fully-propulsive orbit insertion maneuvers is fuel expensive and time consuming, leading a prior study to rule traditional chemical and solar electric propulsion based missions infeasible. One alternative that enables this mission is Titan aerogravity assist, which is an aeroassist maneuver that combines atmospheric flight and gravity assist of Titan to allow a spacecraft to enter a planetary capture orbit about Saturn. This poster will look at the guidance and control techniques that are required to allow aerogravity assist to take place within Titan’s atmosphere.

Soumyo Dutta↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Control Algorithms for Flap-Based Mars Entry Systems

All guided entries of blunt-body entry vehicles have utilized bank-angle steering for hypersonic trajectory control. While bank-angle steering has been suc- cessful on Mars entry missions thus far, such as the Mars Science Laboratory and Mars 2020 missions, this control scheme involves a high degree of coupling over the longitudinal and lateral motion. To simultaneously control these two directions of flight, bank-angle steering vehicles typically select the bank angle magnitude to control the longitudinal motion and perform periodic bank reversals to limit the error in the lateral direction. These bank reversals are undesirable as they are performed open loop and can inject error into the trajectory. An alternative hypersonic control scheme modules the vehicle’s angle of attack (α) and sideslip angle (β) to steer the vehicle, i.e. α − β steering. Also called direct force control (DFC), α − β steering has been recently studied in the literature for both entry and aerocapture missions at several planetary bodies including Mars, Venus, Titan, and the ice giants. α − β steering provides more decoupled control over the trajectory than bank-angle steering by mostly using α to control the longitudinal motion and mostly using β to control the lateral motion. Using α − β steering avoids the bank reversals associated with bank-angle steering, and studies have shown that α − β steering may provide increased robustness to atmospheric dispersions, higher precision in landing accuracy, a lower propellant usage for powered descent, and a larger payload mass, relative to bank-angle steering. Several different actuation concepts have been studied for α − β steering, including moving mass systems, a morphing vehicle structure, and aerodynamic flaps.

Daniel L Engel↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Assessment of Control Algorithms for Mars Entry Vehicles With Flap-Based Trajectory Control Under Uncertainty

Flap-based steering systems on blunt-body entry vehicles may improve flight performance relative to heritage bank-angle steering systems. Successful implementation of articulating aerodynamic flaps on a hypersonic entry vehicle requires an active control system to map angle of attack and sidelip angle commands to flap deflection commands. Here, a successive-linearization model prective control algorithm, as a linear quadratic regulator, are formulated, designed, and assessed to address this multiple input multiple output control problem. These two control algorithms are assessed under uncertainty in Monte Carlo simulations for various control profiles and vehicle configurations. Results indicate that while both control algorithms provide successful command tracking under uncertainty, the model predictive controller provides a lower mean and integral error, as well as greater robustness, relative to the linear-quadratic regulator.

Daniel L Engel↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Flight Performance Comparison of Bank-Angle Steering and Alpha-Beta Steering for Mars Entry Systems

Alpha-beta steering is an alternative hypersonic steering scheme to state-of-the-art bank-angle steering systems for guided Mars entry vehicles. This study uses opti- mal control to generate steering commands for a large robotic Mars entry vehicle using either a bank-angle or alpha-beta steering system to provide a more equal comparison of these two hypersonic steering options, not dependent on guidance design or the inclusion of conventional bank reversals. Objectives maximizing terminal altitude or minimizing control effort, while also reaching a desired target point are considered for both steering options in nominal and dispersed cases. Re- sults indicate both steering options have similar performance, although alpha-beta steering is shown to have improved targeting performance, particularly for the lati- tude/crossrange. Alpha-beta steering is also able to reach higher terminal altitudes by about 0.25 km, relative to the vehicle using bank-angle steering. The difference in altitude maximization capability grows as the allowable vehicle rates decrease.

Daniel L Engel↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Guidance Performance of Bank-Angle and Alpha-Beta Steering for A Large Robotic Mars Entry Vehicle

Entry performance using Apollo-based entry guidance is assessed with a future entry system for a large robotic payload. Both a traditional bank-angle steering system and an innovative alpha-beta steering concept are considered to compare flight performance. Results indicate alpha-beta steering provides an order of magnitude improvement in crossrange error and mean altitudes up to 1 km higher than bank-angle steering. Results also show alpha-beta steering provides downrange errors with a spread half of that of bank-angle steering. Lastly, alpha-beta steering is found to provide a narrower spread of terminal altitude, Mach number, and dynamic pressure, indicating safer parachute deploy conditions.

Daniel L Engel↗